1887
Volume 62, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Coherent noise in land seismic data primarily consists in source‐generated surface‐wave modes. The component that is traditionally considered most relevant is the so‐called ground roll, consisting in surface‐wave modes propagating directly from sources to receivers.

In many geological situations, near‑surface heterogeneities and discontinuities, as well as topography irregularities, diffract the surface waves and generate secondary events, which can heavily contaminate records.

The diffracted and converted surface waves are often called scattered noise and can be a severe problem particularly in areas with shallow or outcropping hard lithological formations. Conventional noise attenuation techniques are not effective with scattering: they can usually address the tails but not the apices of the scattered events. Large source and receiver arrays can attenuate scattering but only in exchange for a compromise to signal fidelity and resolution.

We present a model‑based technique for the scattering attenuation, based on the estimation of surface‐wave properties and on the prediction of surface waves with a complex path involving diffractions.

The properties are estimated first, to produce surface‑consistent volumes of the propagation properties. Then, for all gathers to filter, we integrate the contributions of all possible diffractors, building a scattering model. The estimated scattered wavefield is then subtracted from the data. The method can work in different domains and copes with aliased surface waves. The benefits of the method are demonstrated with synthetic and real data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12118
2014-05-01
2019-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AchenbachJ.D., GautesenA.K. and MendelssohnD.A.1980. Ray analysis of surface‐wave interaction with an edge crack. IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, SU‐27 (3).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.2002. Quantitative Seismology. University Science Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BlonkB.1994. Removal of scattered surface waves from seismic data . PhD thesis, Delft University.
  4. BlonkB. and HermanG.C.1996. Removal of scattered surface waves using multicomponent seismic data. Geophysics61, 1483–1488.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BudaevB.V. and BogyD.B.1995. Rayleigh wave scattering by a wedge. Wave Motion22, 239–257
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BudaevB.V. and BogyD.B.1996. Rayleigh wave scattering by a wedge II. Wave Motion24, 307–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CampmanX.H., van WijkK., ScalesJ.A. and HermanG.C.2005. Imaging and suppressing near‐receiver scattered surface waves. Geophysics70, V21–V29.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ErnstF., HermanG.C. and DitzelA.2002. Removal of scattered guided waves from seismic data. Geophysics67, 1240–1248.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FotiS.2004. Using transfer function for estimating dissipative properties of soils from surface‐wave data. Near Surface Geophysics2, 231–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HallidayD., BilsbyP., QuigleJ. and KraghE.2011. Scattered Ground‐roll Attenuation for 2D Land Data Using Seismic Interferometry. 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  11. HallidayD., CurtisA., VermeerP., StrobbiaC., GlushchenkoA., van ManenD.J. and RobertssonJ.O.A.2010. Interferometric ground‐roll removal: Attenuation of scattered surface waves in single‐sensor data. Geophysics75, 15–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HaskellN.A.1953. The dispersion of surface waves on multilayered media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America43(1), 17–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HermanG.C. and PerkinsC.2006. Predictive removal of scattered noise. Geophysics71, 41–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HisadaY.1994. An efficient method for computing Green's function for a layered half‐space with sources and receivers at close depth. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America84, 1456–1472.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HisadaY.1995. An efficient method for computing Green's function for a layered half‐space with sources and receivers at close depth (part 2). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America85, 1080–1093.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LaakeA.W., SheneshenM.S., StrobbiaC., VelascoL. and CuttsA.2011. Integration of surface/subsurface techniques reveals faults in Gulf of Suez oilfields. Petroleum Geoscience17(2), 165–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LaakeA. and StrobbiaC.2012. Multi‐measurement integration for near‐surface geological characterization. Near Surface Geophysics12, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LiuS., SungJ. and ChanC.1996. Transient scattering of Rayleigh waves by surface‐breaking and sub‐surface cracks. International Journal of Engineering Science34(9), 1059–1075.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MendelssohnD.A., AchenbachJ.D. and KeerL.M.1980. Scattering of elastic waves by a surface‐breaking crack. Wave Motion2, 277–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MunasingheM. and FarnellG.W.1973. Rayleigh Wave Scattering in Layered Media. Proceedings of the Ultrasonics Symposium, 02/1973; DOI:10.1109/ULTSYM.1973.196253
  21. ÖzbekA.2000. Adaptive beam forming with generalized linear constraints. 70th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2081–2084.
  22. PecorariC.2000. Attenuation and dispersion of a Rayleigh wave propagating on a cracked surface: An effective field approach. Ultrasonics38, 754–760.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. PecorariC.2001. Scattering of a Rayleigh wave by a surface‐breaking crack with faces in partial contact. Wave Motion33, 259–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ProubastaD.1985. Ice saw; An incisive solution to seismic noise. The Leading Edge4, 18–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. RichartF.E.Jr., WoodsR.D. and HallJ.R.1970. Vibration of Soil and Foundations. Prentice‐Hall, New Jersey.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rodríguez‐CastellanosA., Ávila‐CarreraR. and Sánchez‐SesmaF.J.2007. Scattering of Rayleigh waves by surface‐breaking cracks: An integral formulation. Geofísica Internacional46(4), 241–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. RydenN. and LoweM.J.2004. Guided wave propagation in three‐layer pavement structures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America116, 2902.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. StrobbiaC. 2003. Surface wave methods: Acquisition, processing and inversion. Torino: Politecnico di Torino.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. StrobbiaC., LaakeA., VermeerP. and GlushchenkoA.2011a. Surface waves: Use them then lose them. Surface‐wave analysis, inversion and attenuation in land reflection seismic surveying. Near Surface Geophysics9, 503–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. StrobbiaC., ZarkhidzeA., MayR., QuigleyJ., IbrahimA., HerreraL., Al QadiA., LeedsA.2011b. Attenuation of aliased coherent noise: Model‐based attenuation for complex dispersive waves. First Break29, 93–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ThomsonW.T.1950. Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid medium. Journal of Applied Physics21, 89–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. VermeerG. J. O.2002. 3‐D Seismic Survey Design. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  33. VignoliG., StrobbiaC., CassianiG. and VermeerP.2011. Statistical multi‐offset phase analysis for surface wave processing in laterally varying media. Geophysics76, 1–11. doi:10.1190/1.3542076
    [Google Scholar]
  34. YanchakD., MonkD., ZarkhidzeA.V., BlairP., LaakeA., StrobbiaC.et al. 2013. Solutions for Scattered Surface‐wave Attenuation in the Western Desert of Egypt. EAGE2013.
  35. ZarkhidzeA., StrobbiaC., IbrahimA., HerreraL., Al QadiA. and LeedsA.2013. Near‐surface characterization, challenges and solutions, for high‐density, high‐productivity, broadband vibroseis point‐source and receiver survey – A case study. SEG2013.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12118
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12118
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Data processing , Noise and Wave
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error