1887
Volume 63, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Unlike light oils, heavy oils do not have a well‐established scheme for modelling elastic moduli from dynamic reservoir properties. One of the main challenges in the fluid substitution of heavy oils is their viscoelastic nature, which is controlled by temperature, pressure, and fluid composition. Here, we develop a framework for fluid substitution modelling that is reliable yet practical for a wide range of cold and thermal recovery scenarios in producing heavy oils and that takes into account the reservoir fluid composition, grounded on the effective‐medium theories for estimating elastic moduli of an oil–rock system. We investigate the effect of fluid composition variations on oil–rock elastic moduli with temperature changes. The fluid compositional behaviour is determined by flash calculations. Elastic moduli are then determined using the double‐porosity coherent potential approximation method and the calculated viscosity based on the fluid composition. An increase in temperature imposes two opposing mechanisms on the viscosity behaviour of a heavy‐oil sample: gas liberation, which tends to increase the viscosity, and melting, which decreases the viscosity. We demonstrate that melting dominates gas liberation, and as a result, the viscosity and, consequently, the shear modulus of the heavy oils always decrease with increasing temperature. Furthermore, it turns out that one can disregard the effects of gas in the solution when modelling the elastic moduli of heavy oils. Here, we compare oil–rock elastic moduli when the rock is saturated with fluids that have different viscosity levels. The objective is to characterize a unique relation between the temperature, the frequency, and the elastic moduli of an oil–rock system. We have proposed an approach that takes advantage of this relation to find the temperature and, consequently, the viscosity in different regions of the reservoir.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12147
2014-11-04
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArenasE.M., OldenzielT. and van KruijsdijkC.P.J.W.2001. History matching a reservoir model to time‐lapse seismic using the pilot point method. EAGE 63rd Conference & Technical Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  2. BatzleM. and WangZ. 1992. Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics57, 1396–1408.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BatzleM., HofmannR. and HanD.‐H. 2006. Heavy oils—seismic properties. The Leading Edge25, 750–757.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BehuraJ., BatzleM., HofmannR. and DorganJ. 2007. Heavy oils: Their shear story. Geophysics72(5), E175–E183.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BerrymanJ.G.1980b. Long‐wavelength propagation in composite elastic media. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1809–1831.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BerrymanJ.G.1995. Mixture theories for rock properties in rock physics and phase relations. In: A Handbook of Physical Constants (ed. T.J.Ahrens ), Washington, DC. American Geophysical Union.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BownT.D. and SchmittD.R. 2010. Seismic dispersion in extra‐heavy oil saturated rock. GeoCanada 2010, Calgary, AB, Canada, 205–228.
  8. CaersJ., HoffmanT., StrebelleS. and WenX.W. 2006. Probabilistic integration of geologic scenarios, seismic, and production data—A West Africa turbidite reservoir case study. The Leading Edge25(3), 240–244.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CizR. and ShapiroS.A. 2007. Generalization of Gassmann's equations for porous media saturated with a solid material. Geophysics72(6), A75–A79.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DaneshA. 1998. PVT and Phase Behavior of Petroleum Reservoir Fluids. Elsevier Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DasA. and BatzleM. 2008. Modeling studies of heavy oil in between solid and fluid properties. The Leading Edge27, 1116–1123.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. EastwoodJ. 1993. Temperature‐dependent propagation of P‐waves and S‐waves in Cold Lake oil sands: Comparison of theory and experiment. Geophysics58, 863–872.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FerryJ.D. 1980. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GassmannF. 1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschr. der Naturforsch. Gesellschaft Zurich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GosselinO., AanonsenS.I., AavatsmarkI., CominelliA., GonardR., KolasinskiM. et al. 2003. History Matching Using Time‐Lapse Seismic (HUTS). SPE Annual Technical and Conference Exhibition, Denver, CO.
  16. GurevichB., OsypovK., CizR. and MakarynskaD. 2008. Modeling elastic wave velocities and attenuation in rocks saturated with heavy oil. Geophysics73(4), E115–E122.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HanD.‐H., YaoQ. and ZhaoH.‐Z. 2007a. Complex properties of heavy oil sand. 77th Annual SEG International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1609–1613.
  18. HashinZ. and ShtrikmanS. 1963. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behavior of multiphase materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids11, 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HuangX., MeisterL. and WorkmanR. 1997. Reservoir characterization by integration of time‐lapse seismic and production data. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX.
  20. JhaveriB.S. and YoungrenG.K. 1988. Three‐parameter modification of Peng–Robinson equation of state to improve volumetric predictions. SPE Reservoir Engineering3(3), 1033–1040.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. KatoA., OnozukaS. and NakayamaT. 2008. Elastic property changes in a bitumen reservoir during steam injection. The Leading Edge27(9), 1124–1131.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KazemiA. and StephenK.D. 2008. Automatic production and seismic history matching by updating locally and by geological environment in the Nelson field. SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Anual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria.
  23. LakesR. 2009. Viscoelastic Materials. Cambridge University Press.
  24. MakarynskaD., GurevichB., BehuraJ. and BatzleM. 2010. Fluid substitution in rocks saturated with viscoelastic fluids. Geophysics75(2), E115–E122.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ. 2009. The Rock Physics Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
  26. MenardK.P. 1999. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis: A Practical Introduction. CRC Press.
  27. MezghaniM., FornelA., LanglaisV. and LucetN. 2004. History matching and quantitative use of 4D seismic data for an improved reservoir characterization. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX.
  28. MindlinR.D. 1949. Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. Journal of Applied Mechanics16, 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. NurA., TosayaC. and ThanhD.V. 1984. Seismic monitoring of thermal enhanced oil recovery processes. 54th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 118–121.
  30. OgushwitzP.R. 1985. Applicability of the Biot theory. I–Low porosity materials. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America77, 429–440.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PedersenK.S., FredenslundA., ChristensenP.L. and ThomassenP. 1984. Viscosity of crude oils. Chemical Engineering Science39(6), 1011–1016.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PengD.‐Y. and RobinsonD.B. 1976. A new two‐constant equation of state. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals15(1), 59–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SchmittD.R. 1999. Seismic attributes for monitoring of a shallow heated heavy oil reservoir: A case study. Geophysics64, 368–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SmithT.M., SondergeldC.H. and RaiC.S. 2003. Gassmann fluid substitutions: A tutorial. Geophysics, 68(2), 430–440.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ViswanathD.S., GhoshK.T., PrasadD.L., DuttN.V.K. and RaniK.Y. 2007. Viscosity of Liquids Theory, Estimation, Experiment, and Data. Springer.
  36. WilsonG. 1968. A modified Redlich–Kwong equation‐of‐state, application to general physical data calculations. AIChE National Meeting, Cleveland, OH.
  37. ZouY., BentleyL.R. and LinesL.R. 2006. Integration of seismic methods with reservoir simulation, Pikes Peak heavy‐oil field, Saskatchewan. The Leading Edge25(6), 764–781.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12147
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Modelling; Reservoir geophysics; Rock physics; Seismic; Time lapse

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error