1887
Volume 63 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Naturally fractured reservoirs are becoming increasingly important for oil and gas exploration in many areas of the world. Because fractures may control the permeability of a reservoir, it is important to be able to find and characterize fractured zones. In fractured reservoirs, the wave‐induced fluid flow between pores and fractures can cause significant dispersion and attenuation of seismic waves. For waves propagating normal to the fractures, this effect has been quantified in earlier studies. Here we extend normal incidence results to oblique incidence using known expressions for the stiffness tensors in the low‐ and high‐frequency limits. This allows us to quantify frequency‐dependent anisotropy due to the wave‐induced flow between pores and fractures and gives a simple recipe for computing phase velocities and attenuation factors of quasi‐P and SV waves as functions of frequency and angle. These frequency and angle dependencies are concisely expressed through dimensionless velocity anisotropy and attenuation anisotropy parameters. It is found that, although at low frequencies, the medium is close to elliptical (which is to be expected as a dry medium containing a distribution of penny‐shaped cracks is known to be close to elliptical); at high frequencies, the coupling between P‐wave and SV‐wave results in anisotropy due to the non‐vanishing excess tangential compliance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12177
2014-10-17
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BakulinA., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.2000. Estimation of fracture parameters from refection seismic data – Part I: HTI model due to a single fracture set. Geophysics65, 1788–1802.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BehuraJ. and TsvankinI.2009. Estimation of interval anisotropic attenuation from reflection data. Geophysics74, A69–A74.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BestA.I., SothcottJ. and McCannC.2007. A laboratory study of seismic velocity and attenuation anisotropy in near‐surface sedimentary rocks. Geophysical Prospecting55, 609–625.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BiotM.A.1962. Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. Journal of Applied Physics33, 1482–1498.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BiotM.A. and WillisD.G.1957. The elastic coefficients of the theory of consolidation. Journal of Applied Mechanics24, 594–601.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BrajanovskiM., GurevichB. and SchoenbergM.2005. A model for P‐wave attenuation and dispersion in a porous medium permeated by aligned fractures. Geophysical Journal International163, 372–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BrownL. and GurevichB.2004. Frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy of porous rocks with penny‐shaped cracks. Exploration Geophysics35(2), 111–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BrownR.J.S. and KorringaJ.1975. On the dependence of the elastic properties of a porous rock on the compressibility of the pore fluid. Geophysics40, 608–616.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CarcioneJ.M.2007. Theory and numerical simulation of wave propagation in anisotropic, anelastic, porous and electromagnetic media. Elsevier.
  10. CarcioneJ.M., GurevichB., SantosJ.E. and PicottiS.2013. Angular and frequency‐dependent wave velocity and attenuation in fractured porous media. Pure and Applied Geophysics170, 1673–1683.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CarcioneJ.M., PicottiS. and SantosJ.E.2012a. Numerical experiments of fracture‐induced velocity and attenuation anisotropy. Geophysical Journal International191, 1179–1191.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. CarcioneJ.M., SantosJ.E. and PicottiS.2012b. Fracture‐induced anisotropic attenuation. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering45, 929–942.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. CardonaR.2002. Two theories for fluid substitution in porous rocks with aligned cracks. 72nd Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 173–176.
  14. ChapmanM.2003. Frequency dependent anisotropy due to meso‐scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting51, 369–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ChichininaT.I., ObolentsevaI.R., GikL., BobrovB. and Ronquillo‐JarilloG.2009a. Attenuation anisotropy in the linear‐slip model: interpretation of physical modeling data. Geophysics74, WB165–WB176.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ChichininaT.I., ObolentsevaI.R. and Ronquillo‐JarilloG.2009b. Anisotropy of seismic attenuation in fractured media: theory and ultrasonic experiment. Transport in Porous Media79, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ClarkR.A., BensonP.M., CarterA.J. and Guerrero‐MorenoC.A.2009. Anisotropic p‐wave attenuation measured from a multi‐azimuth surface seismic reflection survey. Geophysical Prospecting57, 835–845.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GalvinR.J. and GurevichB.2006. Interaction of an elastic wave with a circular crack in a fluid‐saturated porous medium. Applied Physics Letters88, 061918.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. GalvinR.J. and GurevichB.2007. Scattering of a longitudinal wave by a circular crack in a fluid‐saturated porous medium. International Journal of Solids and Structures44, 7389–7398.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GalvinR.J. and GurevichB.2009. Effective properties of a poroelastic medium containing a distribution of aligned cracks. Journal of Geophysical Research114, B07305.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Zürich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. GurevichB.2003. Elastic properties of saturated porous rocks with aligned fractures. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 203–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. GurevichB., BrajanovskiM., GalvinR., MullerT. and Toms‐StewartJ.2009. P‐wave dispersion and attenuation in fractured and porous reservoirs ‐ poroelasticity approach. Geophysical Prospecting57, 225–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. GurevichB. and LopatnikovS.L.1995. Velocity and attenuation of elastic waves in finely layered porous rocks. Geophysical Journal International121, 933–947.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. HudsonJ., PointerT. and LiuE.2001. Effective‐medium theories for fluid‐saturated materials with aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting49, 509–522.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. HudsonJ.A.1980. Overall properties of a cracked solid. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society88, 371–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. HudsonJ.A., LiuE. and CrampinS.1996. The mechanical properties of materials with interconnected cracks and pores. Geophysical Journal International124, 105–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. JakobsenM., JohansenT.A. and McCannC.2003. The acoustic signature of fluid flow in complex porous media. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 219–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. JohnsonD.L.2001. Theory of frequency dependent acoustics in patchy‐saturated porous media. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America110, 682–694.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. KrzikallaF. and MüllerT.2011. Anisotropic p‐sv‐wave dispersion and attenuation due to inter‐layer flow in thinly layered porous rocks. Geophysics76, WA135–WA145.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. LambertG., GurevichB. and BrajanovskiM.2005. Frequency dependent anisotropy of porous fractured rocks. 67th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Madrid, Spain, Expanded Abstracts.
  32. MaultzschS., ChapmanM., LiuE. and LiX.2003. Modelling frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy in fluid‐saturated rock with aligned fractures: implication of fracture size estimation from anisotropic measurements. Geophysical Prospecting51, 381–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. MavkoG. and JizbaD.1991. Estimating grain‐scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics56, 1940–1949.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.1998. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis in Porous Media. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. MüllerT. and GurevichB.2005. Wave‐induced fluid flow in random porous media: attenuation and dispersion of elastic waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America117, 2732–2741.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. NorrisA.N.1993. Low‐frequency dispersion and attenuation in partially saturated rocks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America94, 359–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. SchoenbergM. and DoumaJ.1988. Elastic‐wave propagation in media with parallel fractures and aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting36, 571–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. SchoenbergM. and SayersC.M.1995. Seismic anisotropy of fractured rock. Geophysics60, 204–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. ThomsenL.1995. Elastic anisotropy due to aligned cracks in porous rock. Geophysical Prospecting43, 805–829.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. WatermanP.C. and TruellR.1961. Multiple scattering of waves. Journal of Mathematical Physics2, 512–537.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. WenzlauF., AltmannJ.B., and MüllerT.2010. Anisotropic dispersion and attenuation due to wave‐induced fluid flow: quasi‐static finite element modeling in poroelastic solids. Journal of Geophysical Research115, B07204.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. ZhuY. and TsvankinI.2006. Plane‐wave propagation in attenuative transversely isotropic media. Geophysics71, T17–T30.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. ZhuY., TsvankinI. and van WijkK.2007. Physical modelling and analysis of p‐wave attenuation anisotropy in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics72, D1–D7.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12177
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12177
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error