1887
Volume 63 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Several power‐law relationships of geophysical potential fields have been discussed recently with renewed interests, including field value–distance () and power spectrum–wavenumber () models. The singularity mapping technique based on the density/concentration–area (C–A) power‐law model is applied to act as a high‐pass filter for extracting gravity and magnetic anomalies regardless of the background value and to detect the edges of gravity or magnetic sources with the advantage of scale invariance. This is demonstrated on a synthetic example and a case study from the Nanling mineral district, Southern China. Compared with the analytic signal amplitude and total horizontal gradient methods, the singularity mapping technique provides more distinct and less noisy boundaries of granites than traditional methods. Additionally, it is efficient for enhancing and outlining weak anomalies caused by concealed granitic intrusions, indicating that the singularity method based on multifractal analysis is a potential tool to process gravity and magnetic data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12187
2014-12-02
2020-05-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AfzalP., AlghalandisY.F., KhakzadA., MoarefvandP. and OmranN.R.2011. Delineation of mineralization zones in porphyry Cu deposits by fractal concentration–volume modeling. Journal of Geochemical Exploration108, 220–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AgterbergF.P.1989. Computer Programs for Mineral Exploration. American Association for the Advancement of Science, ISBN 0036–8075.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AgterbergF.P.1995. Multifractal modeling of the sizes and grades of giant and supergiant deposits. International Geology Review37, 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BansalA. and DimriV.2005. Depth determination from a non‐stationary magnetic profile for scaling geology. Geophysical Prospecting53, 399–410.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BansalA., DimriV. and SagarG.2006. Quantitative interpretation of gravity and magnetic data over Southern Granulite Terrain using scaling spectral approach. Journal Geological Society of India67, 469.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BansalA., GabrielG. and DimriV.2010. Power law distribution of susceptibility and density and its relation to seismic properties: an example from the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB). Journal of Applied Geophysics72, 123–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BansalA.R. and DimriV.P.2001. Depth estimation from the scaling power spectral density of nonstationary gravity profile. Pure and Applied Geophysics158, 799–812.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BlakelyR.J. and SimpsonR.W.1986. Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysics51, 1494–1498.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BouligandC., GlenJ.M. and BlakelyR.J.2009. Mapping Curie temperature depth in the western United States with a fractal model for crustal magnetization. Journal of Geophysical Research114, B11104.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CarlsonC.A.1991. Spatial distribution of ore deposits. Geology19, 111–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CellaF., FediM. and FlorioG.2009. Toward a full multiscale approach to interpret potential fields. Geophysical Prospecting57, 543–557.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ChenZ., ChengQ., ChenJ. and XieS.2007. A novel iterative approach for mapping local singularities from geochemical data. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics14, 317–324.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ChengQ.1997. Fractal/multifractal modeling and spatial analysis. Proceedings of the International Association for Mathematical Geology (IAMG) Conference, pp. 22–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ChengQ.1999a. Multifractality and spatial statistics. Computers & Geosciences25, 949–961.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ChengQ.1999b. Spatial and scaling modelling for geochemical anomaly separation. Journal of Geochemical Exploration65, 175–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ChengQ.2000. GeoData Analysis System (GeoDAS) for Mineral Exploration: User's Guide and Exercise Manual . Material for the training workshop on GeoDAS held at York University, November 1–3, 2000, p. 204.
  17. ChengQ.2002. Multifractal modeling and GIS spatial analysis of complex fault systems. GeoInformatics13, 46–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ChengQ.2007. Mapping singularities with stream sediment geochemical data for prediction of undiscovered mineral deposits in Gejiu, Yunnan Province, China. Ore Geology Reviews32, 314–324.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ChengQ.2008a. A combined power‐law and exponential model for streamflow recessions. Journal of Hydrology352, 157–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ChengQ.2008b. Non‐linear theory and power‐law models for information integration and mineral resources quantitative assessments. Mathematical Geosciences40, 503–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ChengQ.2012a. Multiplicative cascade processes and information integration for predictive mapping. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics19, 57–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ChengQ.2012b. Singularity theory and methods for mapping geochemical anomalies caused by buried sources and for predicting undiscovered mineral deposits in covered areas. Journal of Geochemical Exploration122, 55–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ChengQ. and AgterbergF.P.2008. Singularity analysis of ore‐mineral and toxic trace elements in stream sediments. Computers & Geosciences35, 234–244.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ChengQ., AgterbergF. and BallantyneS.1994. The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods. Journal of Geochemical Exploration51, 109–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ChengQ., RussellH., SharpeD., KennyF. and QinP.2001. GIS‐based statistical and fractal/multifractal analysis of surface stream patterns in the Oak Ridges Moraine. Computers & Geosciences27, 513–526.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ChengQ., XiaQ., LiW., ZhangS., ChenZ., ZuoR.et al. 2010. Density/area power‐law models for separating multi‐scale anomalies of ore and toxic elements in stream sediments in Gejiu mineral district, Yunnan Province, China. Biogeosciences7, 3019–3025.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. CordellL.1979. Gravimetric expression of graben faulting in Santa Fe country and the Espanola Basin, New Mexico. In: Guidebook to Santa Fe County: 30th Field Conference, New Mexico Geological Society, pp. 59–64.
  28. CordellL. and GrauchV.1985. Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in The San Juan Basin, New Mexico. 52nd SEG Annual International Meeting, Dallas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 246–247.
  29. EvertszyC.J. and MandelbrotB.B.1992. Multifractal measures.
  30. EvjenH.1936. The place of the vertical gradient in gravitational interpretations. Geophysics1, 127–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. FediM.2003. Global and local multiscale analysis of magnetic susceptibility data. Pure and Applied Geophysics160, 2399–2417.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. FediM., QuartaT. and De SantisA.1997. Inherent power‐law behavior of magnetic field power spectra from a Spector and Grant ensemble. Geophysics62, 1143–1150.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. GettingsM.2005. Multifractal magnetic susceptibility distribution models of hydrothermally altered rocks in the Needle Creek Igneous Center of the Absaroka Mountains, Wyoming. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics12, 587–601.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. GettingsM.2012. Multifractal model of magnetic susceptibility distributions in some igneous rocks. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics19, 635–642.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. HuangG. and DengY.2002. Map of geology and mineral resources of Nanling region , China. (ed. H.I.o.G.Survey ).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. KellerJ.M., ChenS. and CrownoverR.M.1989. Texture description and segmentation through fractal geometry. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing45, 150–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. KoC. and ChengQ.2004. GIS spatial modeling of river flow and precipitation in the Oak Ridges Moraine area, Ontario. Computers & Geosciences30, 379–389.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. LiC., MaT. and ShiJ.2003. Application of a fractal method relating concentrations and distances for separation of geochemical anomalies from background. Journal of Geochemical Exploration77, 167–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. LiQ. and ChengQ.2004. Fractal singular‐value (eigen‐value) decomposition method for geophysical and geochemical anomaly reconstruction. Journal of China University of Geosciences29, 109–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. LovejoyS., PecknoldS. and SchertzerD.2001. Stratified multifractal magnetization and surface geomagnetic fields–I. Spectral analysis and modeling. Geophysical Journal International145, 112–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. MandelbrotB.1967. How long is the coast of Britain. Science156, 636–638.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. MandelbrotB.1972. Possible refinement of the lognormal hypothesis concerning the distribution of energy dissipation in intermittent turbulence. Statistical Models and Turbulence, 333–351.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. MandelbrotB.1989. Multifractal measures, especially for the geophysicist. Pure and Applied Geophysics131, 5–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MausS. and DimriV.1994. Scaling properties of potential fields due to scaling sources. Geophysical Research Letters21, 891–894.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. MausS. and DimriV.1996. Depth estimation from the scaling power spectrum of potential fields. Geophysical Journal International124, 113–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. PanahiA. and ChengQ.2004. Multifractality as a measure of spatial distribution of geochemical patterns. Mathematical Geology36, 827–846.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. PavlisN.K., HolmesS.A., KenyonS.C. and FactorJ.K.2008. An earth gravitational model to degree 2160: EGM2008. EGU General Assembly, 13–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. PecknoldS., LovejoyS. and SchertzerD.2001. Stratified multifractal magnetization and surface geomagnetic fields–II. Multifractal analysis and simulations. Geophysical Journal International145, 127–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. PelegS., NaorJ., HartleyR. and AvnirD.1984. Multiple resolution texture analysis and classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 518–523.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. PilkingtonM., GregotskiM. and TodoeschuckJ.1994. Using fractal crustal magnetization models in magnetic interpretation1. Geophysical Prospecting42, 677–692.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. PilkingtonM. and KeatingP.2004. Contact mapping from gridded magnetic data – a comparison of techniques. Exploration Geophysics35, 306–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. PilkingtonM. and TodoeschuckJ.1993. Fractal magnetization of continental crust. Geophysical Research Letters20, 627–630.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. RaoJ.R.2006. Ore controlling regularities of deep structure magma and seeking mineral orientation on the northern margin of the middle segment of Nanling. Land and Resources Herald3, 31–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. RoestW.R., VerhoefJ. and PilkingtonM.1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3‐D analytic signal. Geophysics57, 116–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. SchertzerD. and LovejoyS.1987. Physical modeling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012)92, 9693–9714.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. SchertzerD. and LovejoyS.1991. Non‐Linear Variability in Geophysics: Scaling and Fractals. Springer. ISBN 0792309855.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. SornetteD.2004. Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization, and Disorder: Concepts and Tools. Springer Verlag. ISBN 3540407545.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. SpectorA. and GrantF.1970. Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics35, 293–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. TessierY., LovejoyS., HubertP., SchertzerD. and PecknoldS.1996. Multifractal analysis and modeling of rainfall and river flows and scaling, causal transfer functions. Journal of Geophysical Research101, 26427–26440.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. TessierY., LovejoyS. and SchertzerD.1993. Universal multifractals: theory and observations for rain and clouds. Journal of Applied Meteorology32, 223–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. TurcotteD.L.2002. Fractals in petrology. Lithos65, 261–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. WangD., ChenY., ChenZ., LiuS., XuJ., ZhangJ., et al. 2007. Assessment on mineral resource in Nanling region and suggestion for further prospecting. Acta Geologica Sinica81, 882–890.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. WangW., ZhaoJ. and ChengQ.2011. Analysis and integration of geo‐information to identify granitic intrusions as exploration targets in southeastern Yunnan District, China. Computers & Geosciences37, 1946–1957.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. WangW., ZhaoJ. and ChengQ.2013. Application of singularity index mapping technique to gravity/magnetic data analysis in southeastern Yunnan mineral district, China. Journal of Applied Geophysics92, 39–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. WangW., ZhaoJ., ChengQ. and LiuJ.2012. Tectonic–geochemical exploration modeling for characterizing geo‐anomalies in southeastern Yunnan district, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration122, 71–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. XieS. and BaoZ.2004. Fractal and multifractal properties of geochemical fields. Mathematical Geology36, 847–864.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. XieS., ChengQ., ChenG., ChenZ. and BaoZ.2007. Application of local singularity in prospecting potential oil/gas targets. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics14, 285–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. YuC. and PengN.2009. Regional Ore Zonality of the Nanling Region. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
    [Google Scholar]
  69. ZhaoP.2002. Three‐component quantitative resource prediction and assessments: theory and practice of digital mineral prospecting. Earth Science‐Journal of China University of Geosciences27, 482–489.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. ZuoR.2011. Identifying geochemical anomalies associated with Cu and Pb–Zn skarn mineralization using principal component analysis and spectrum–area fractal modeling in the Gangdese Belt, Tibet (China). Journal of Geochemical Exploration111, 13–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. ZuoR., ChengQ., AgterbergF. and XiaQ.2009. Application of singularity mapping technique to identify local anomalies using stream sediment geochemical data, a case study from Gangdese, Tibet, western China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration101, 225–235.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12187
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12187
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Granitic intrusions , Gravity , Multifractal , Nanling and Singularity index
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error