1887
Volume 63, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We present an alternative to Roy's theorem for direct current regimes with the aim of validating the theoretical basis of signal contribution sections in electrical prospecting. Roy's theorem establishes that the electrical potential at a point can be expressed as an integral over all space of the electric field weighted by the gradient of inverse distance. The integrand is interpreted to represent elementary contributions to the potential that can be analyzed to compare different electrode arrays. Signal contribution sections and depth of investigation characteristics can be beautifully illustrated with important practical applications. However, the electric potential, being the solution of a boundary value problem, cannot be uniquely decomposed into elementary contributions. There is no guarantee for the integrand of a given integral to be meaningful in all situations. In the case of Roy's theorem, the concept has been severely criticized by respected scholars who challenged the scientific legitimacy of his approach. If we are going to keep the concept of elementary contributions alive, we need to go beyond Roy's theorem. In this paper, we develop an alternative theorem and show that it merges with the concept of sensitivity, which is unique and mathematically sound, and is also open to physical validation. This prevents any possible contradictions in the future and, equally important, eliminates the dichotomy between sensitivity and elementary contributions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12214
2015-01-28
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BarkerR.D.1979. Signal contribution sections and their use in resistivity studies. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society59, 123–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BarkerR.D.1981. The offset system of electrical resistivity sounding and its use with a multicore cable. Geophysical Prospecting29(1), 128–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BarkerR.D.1989. Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four‐electrode arrays. Geophysics54(8), 1031–1037.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BhattacharyaB.B. and SenM.K.1981. Depth of investigation of collinear electrode arrays over homogeneous anisotropic half‐space in direct current methods. Geophysics46(5), 768–780.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. EdwardsL.S.1977. A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP. Geophysics42(5), 1020–1036.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. EsparzaF.J. and Gómez‐TrevinoE.1997. 1‐D inversion of resistivity and induced polarization data for the least number of layers. Geophysics62(6), 1724–1729.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. EvjenH.M.1938. Depth factors and resolving power of electrical measurements. Geophysics3(2), 78–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gómez‐TreviñoE.1987. Nonlinear integral equations for electromagnetic inverse problems. Geophysics52(9), 1297–1302.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gómez‐TreviñoE. and EsparzaF.2014. What is the depth of investigation of a resistivity measurement? Geophysics79(2), W1–W10.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GrantF.S. and WestG.F.1965. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 130. McGraw‐Hill, New York, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GreenhalghS.A., ZhouB., GreenhalghM., MarescotL. and WieseT.2009. Explicit expressions for the Fréchet derivatives in 3D anisotropic resistivity inversion. Geophysics74(3), F31–F43.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GuerreiroS.C.1983. Comment on “A theorem for direct current regimes and some of its consequences” by A. Roy and some related papers and comments. Geophysical Prospecting31, 192–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GuptasarmaD.1981. Comments on “A theorem for direct current regimes and some of its consequences” by A. Roy. Geophysical Prospecting29(2), 308–315.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KoefoedO.1972. Discussion on depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics36, 943–959.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ParasnisD.S.1984. More comments on “A theorem for DC regimes and some of its consequences” by A. Roy. Geophysical Prospecting32(1), 139–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pérez‐FloresM.A., Méndez‐DelgadoS. and Gómez‐TreviñoE.2001. Imaging low‐frequency and dc electromagnetic fields using a simple linear approximation. Geophysics66(4), 1067–1081.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RoyA. and ApparaoA.1971. Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics36(5), 943–959.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RoyA.1978. A theorem for direct current regimes and some of its consequences. Geophysical Prospecting26, 442–463.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SeigelH.O.1959. Mathematical formulation and type curves for induced polarization. Geophysics24(3), 547–565.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. StefanescuS., SclumbergerC. and SclumbergerM.1930. Sur la distribution eléctrique potentielle autour d'une prise de terre ponctuelle dans un terrain à couches horizontales, homogènes et isotropes. Le Journal de Physique et le Radium8(4), 132–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SzalaiS., SzarkaL., PrácserE., BoschF., MüllerI. and TurbergP.2002. Geoelectric mapping of near‐surface karstic fractures by using null arrays. Geophysics67(6), 1769–1778.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SzalaiS. and SzarkaL.2008. Parameter sensitivity maps of surface geoelectric arrays I. Linear arrays. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica43(4), 419–437.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SzalaiS. and SzarkL.2008. Parameter sensitivity maps of surface geoelectric arrays II. Nonlinear and focussed arrays. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica43(4), 439–447.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SzalaiS., NovákA. and SzarkaL.2009. Depth of investigation and vertical resolution of surface geoelectric arrays. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics14(1), 15–23.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12214
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12214
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy; Inversion; Mathematical formulation; Resistivity; Theory

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error