1887
Volume 63, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Heating heavy oil reservoirs is a common method for reducing the high viscosity of heavy oil and thus increasing the recovery factor. Monitoring of these viscosity changes in the reservoir is essential for delineating the heated region and controlling production. In this study, we present an approach for estimating viscosity changes in a heavy oil reservoir. The approach consists of three steps: measuring seismic wave attenuation between reflections from above and below the reservoir, constructing time‐lapse Q and Q−1 factor maps, and interpreting these maps using Kelvin–Voigt and Maxwell viscoelastic models. We use a 4D relative spectrum method to measure changes in attenuation. The method is tested with synthetic seismic data that are noise free and data with additive Gaussian noise to show the robustness and the accuracy of the estimates of the Q‐factor. The results of the application of the method to a field data set exhibit alignment of high attenuation zones along the steam‐injection wells, and indicate that temperature dependent viscosity changes in the heavy oil reservoir can be explained by the Kelvin–Voigt model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12229
2015-01-15
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.2002. Quantitative seismology. Univ Science Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BadriM. and MooneyH.M.1987. Q measurements from compressional seismic waves in unconsolidated sediments. Geophysics52, 772–784.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BarsonD.2001. Flow systems in the Mannville Group in the east‐central Athabasca area and implications for steam‐assited gravity drainage (SAGD) operations for in situ bitumen production. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology49, 376–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BatzleM., HofmannR. and HanD.‐H.2006a. Heavy oil ‐ seismic properties. Leading Edge25, 750–757.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BatzleM., HanD.‐H. and HofmannR.2006b. Fluid mobility and frequency‐dependent seismic velocity ‐ Direct measurements. Geophysics71, N1–N9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BehuraJ., BatzleM.HofmannR. and DorganJ.2007. Heavy oils: Their shear story. Geophysics72, E175–E183.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BlanchardT., ClarkR.van der BaanM. and LawsE.2009. Time‐lapse attenuation as a tool for monitoring pore fluid changes in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Presented at the 71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition.
  8. BouchonM.1981. A simple method to calculate Green's functions for elastic layered media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America71, 959–971.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ByerleyG., BarhamG., TomberlinT. and VandalB.2008. 4D seismic monitoring applied to SAGD operations at Surmont, Alberta, Canada. 78th SEG meeting, Las Vegas, NV, Expanded Abstracts, 3959–3963.
  10. CarcioneJ. M.2007. Wave Fields in Real Media ‐ Wave Propagation in Anisotropic, Anelastic, Porous and Electromagnetic Media. Elsevier.
  11. CarterA.2003. Seismic wave attenuation from surface seismic reflection surveys ‐ an exploration tool. University of Leeds PHD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ChenQ. and SidneyS.1997. Seismic attribute technology for reservoir forecasting and monitoring. The Leading Edge16, 445–448.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ChopraS.2010. Heavy oils. reservoir characterization and production monitoring. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ClarkB., GravesW. G., Lopez‐de‐CardenasJ. E., GurfinkelM. E. and PeatsA. W.2007. Working Document of the NPC Global Oil and Gas Study, Topic Paper22.
  15. ClarkR.A., BensonP.M., CarterA.J. and MorenoC.A.G.2009. Anisotropic p‐wave attenuation measured from a multi‐azimuth surface seismic reflection survey. Geophysical Prospecting57, 835–845.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ColeK.C. and ColeH.R.1941. Dispersion and Absorbtion in Dielectrics. Journal of Chemical Physics9, 341–351.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DasA. and BatzleM.2008. Modeling studies of heavy oil ‐ in between solid and fluid properties. Leading Edge Special Section: Heavy oil , 1116–1123.
  18. DasguptaR. and ClarkR.A.1998. Estimation of Q from surface seismic reflection data. Geophysics63, 2120–2128.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. EastwoodL.1993. Temperature‐dependent propagation of P‐ and S‐waves in Cold Lake oil sands: Comparison of theory and experiment. Geophysics58, 863–872.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. FeustelA.J. and YoungR.P.1994. Qβ estimates from spectral ratios and multiple lapse time window analysis: results from an underground research laboratory in granite. Geophysical research letters21, 1503–1506.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HanD.‐H., LiuJ. and BatzleM.2007. Shear velocity as the function of frequency in heavy oils. 77th SEG Abstract 1716–1719.
  22. HaugeP.S.1981. Measurements of attenuation from vertical seismic profiles. Geophysics46, 1548–1558.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HedlinK., MewhortL. and MargraveG.2001. Delineation of steam flood using seismic attenuation. 71st SEG meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1572–1575.
  24. KendallR.2009. Using time lapse seismic to monitor the THAI heavy oil production process. 79th SEG meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3954–3958.
  25. KraghE. and ChristieP.2002. Seismic repeatability, normalized rms, and predictability. The Leading Edge21, 640–647.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LecerfD., RogersM. and LefeuvreF.2006. Time‐spectral analysis for 4D data q‐controlled calibration. Presented at the 68th EAGE Conference & Exhibition.
  27. MateevaA.A.2003. Thin horizontal layering as a stratigraphic filter in absorption estimation and seismic deconvolution. PhD thesis, Colorado School of Mines.
  28. MatsushimaJ.2006. Seismic wave attenuation in methane hydrate‐bearing sediments: vertical seismic profiling data from the Nankai trough exploratory well, offshore Tokai, central Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research111, B10101.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.1998. The Rock Physics Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MenkeW., LevinV. and SethiR.1995. Seismic attenuation in the crust at the mid‐Atlantic plate boundary in south‐west Iceland. International Journal of Geophysics122, 175–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. MochinagaH., OnozukaS., KonoF., OgawaT., TakahashiA. and TorigoeT.2006. Properties of Oil sands and Bitumen in Athabasca. CSPG‐CSEG‐CWLS Convention, 39–44.
  32. OppenheimA.V. and SchaferW.R.2010. Discrete‐Time Signal Processing 3rd ed. Pearson.
  33. ReineC., ClarkR. and van der BaanM.2012. Robust prestack Q‐determination using surface seismic data: Part 1‐ method and synthetic examples. Geophysics77, R45–R56.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. ReineC., ClarkR. and van der BaanM.2012b. Robust prestack Q‐determination using surface seismic data: Part 2‐3D case study. Geophysics77, B1–B10.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ReineC., van der BaanM. and ClarkR.2009. The robustness of seismic attenuation measurements using fixed‐and variable‐window time‐frequency transforms. Geophysics74, WA123–WA135.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. RickettJ.2006. Integrated estimation of interval‐attenuation profiles. Geophysics71, A19–A23.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. SchmittD.1999. Seismic attributes for monitoring of a shallow heated heavy oil reservoir: a case study. Geophysics64, 368–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. SunS. and CastagnaJ.P.2000. Attenuation estimation from vertical seismic profile data. Presented at the 2000 SEG Annual Meeting.
  39. ToksözM.N., JohnstonH.D. and TimurA.1979. Attenuation of seismic waves in dry and saturated rocks: I. laboratory measurements. Geophysics44, 681–690.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. VasconcelosI., and JennerE.2005. Estimation of azimuthally varying attenuation from surface seismic data. Center for Wave Phenomena Annual Report CWP‐516, 89–106.
  41. VendatiN. and SenK.M.2009. Seismic inversion tracks in situ combustion: A case study from Balol oil fiel, India. Geophysics74, B103–B112.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. WangY.2003. Quantifying the effectiveness of stabilized inverse Q filtering. Geophysics68, 337–345.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12229
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12229
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error