1887
Volume 63, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The recent use of marine electromagnetic technology for exploration geophysics has primarily focused on applying the controlled source electromagnetic method for hydrocarbon mapping. However, this technology also has potential for structural mapping applications, particularly when the relative higher frequency controlled source electromagnetic data are combined with the lower frequencies of naturally occurring magnetotelluric data. This paper reports on an extensive test using data from 84 marine controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric stations for imaging volcanic sections and underlying sediments on a 128‐km‐long profile. The profile extends across the trough between the Faroe and Shetland Islands in the North Sea. Here, we focus on how 2.5D inversion can best recover the volcanic and sedimentary sections. A synthetic test carried out with 3D anisotropic model responses shows that vertically transverse isotropy 2.5D inversion using controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data provides the most accurate prediction of the resistivity in both volcanic and sedimentary sections. We find the 2.5D inversion works well despite moderate 3D structure in the synthetic model. Triaxial inversion using the combination of controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data provided a constant resistivity contour that most closely matched the true base of the volcanic flows. For the field survey data, triaxial inversion of controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data provides the best overall tie to well logs with vertically transverse isotropy inversion of controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data a close second. Vertical transverse isotropy inversion of controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data provided the best interpreted base of the volcanic horizon when compared with our best seismic interpretation. The structural boundaries estimated by the 20‐Ω·m contour of the vertical resistivity obtained by vertical transverse isotropy inversion of controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data gives a maximum geometric location error of 11% with a mean error of 1.2% compared with the interpreted base of the volcanic horizon. Both the model study and field data interpretation indicate that marine electromagnetic technology has the potential to discriminate between low‐resistivity prospective siliciclastic sediments and higher resistivity non‐prospective volcaniclastic sediments beneath the volcanic section.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12278
2015-06-02
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlumbaughD., HoverstenM., StefaniJ. and ThacherC.2013. A 3D model study to investigate EM imaging of sub‐basalt structures in a deep water environment. 83rd SEG meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 765–769.
  2. ColomboD., KehoT., JanoubiE. and SoyerW.2011. Sub‐basalt imaging with broadband magnetotellurics in NW Saudi Arabia. 81st SEG annual meeting, San Antonio, USA, 619–623.
  3. CommerM. and NewmanG.A.2009. Three‐dimensional controlled‐source electromagnetic and magnetotellurics joint inversion. Geophysical Journal International178, 1305–1616.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ConnellD. and KeyK.2013. A numerical comparison of time and frequency‐domain marine electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration in shallow water. Geophysical Prospecting61, 187–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ConstableS., WeissC.J.2006. Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: Insights from 1D modeling. Geophysics71, G43–G51.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ConstableS.C., OrangeA., HoverstenG.M. and MorrisonH.F.1998. Marine magnetotellurics for petroleum exploration, Part 1: A sea‐floor equipment system. Geophysics63, 816–825.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. EgbertG.D.1997. Robust multiple‐station magnetotelluric data processing. Geophysical Journal International130(2), 475–496.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. EllisM. and MacGregorL.2012. An electrical rock physics model for partially interconnected fluid inclusions/cracks. 82nd SEG annual meeting, Las Vegas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1–5.
  9. GradM., TiiraT. and ESC Working Group2009. The Moho depth map of the European Plate. Geophysical Journal International176, 279–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HoverstenG.M., MorrisonH.F. and ConstableS.C.1998. Marine magnetotellurics for petroleum exploration, Part 2: Numerical analysis of subsalt resolution. Geophysics63, 826–840.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JegenM.D., HobbsR.W., TaritsP. and ChaveA.2009. Joint inversion of marine magnetotelluric and gravity data incorporating seismic constraints Preliminary results of sub‐basalt imaging off the Faroe Shelf. Earth and Planetary Science Letters282(1–4), 47–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KeyK.W., ConstableS.C. and WeissC.J.2006. Mapping 3D salt using the 2D marine magnetotelluric method: Case study from Gemini Prospect, Gulf of Mexico. Geophysics71(1), B17–B27.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KeyK. and LockwoodA.2010. Determining the orientation of marine CSEM receivers using orthogonal Procrustes rotation analysis. Geophysics75(3), F63–F70.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KeyK. and OvallJ.2011. A parallel goal‐oriented adaptive finite element method for 2.5‐D electromagnetic modeling. Geophysical Journal International186(1), 137–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KeyK.2012. Marine EM inversion using unstructured grids: a 2D parallel adaptive finite element algorithm. 82nd SEG annual meeting, Las Vegas, USA, Expanded Abstracts 1–5.
  16. KleinJ.D., MartinP.R. and AllenD.F.1997. The petrophysics of electrically anisotropic reservoirs. The Log Analyst38, 25–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MortenJ.P., FanavollS. and MropeF.M.2001. Sub‐basalt Imaging Using Broadside CSEM. 73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, C029.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MorrisonH.F., ShohamY., HoverstenG.M. and Torres‐VerdinC.1996. Electromagnetic mapping of electrical conductivity beneath the Columbia basalts. Geophysical Prospecting44, 963–986.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MyerD., ConstableS. and KeyK.2011. Broad‐band waveforms and robust processing for marine CSEM surveys. Geophysical Journal International184(2), 689–698.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MyerD., ConstableS. and KeyK.2013. Magnetotelluric evidence for layered mafic intrusions beneath the Vøring and Exmouth rifted margins. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors220, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. NewmanG.A., CommerM. and CarazzoneJ.J.2010. Imaging CSEM data in the presence of electrical anisotropy. Geophysics75, F51–F61.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SmithT., HoverstenG.M., GasperikovaE. and MorrisonF.1999. Sharp boundary inversion of 2D magnetotellurics data. Geophysical Prospecting47, 469–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. StrackK.M. and PandeyP.B.2007. Exploration with controlled‐source electromagnetic under basalt cover in India. The Leading Edge26, 260–363.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. WarrenR.K. and SrnkaL.J.1992. Exploration in the basalt‐covered areas of the Columbia River Basin, Washington, using electromagnetic array profiling (EMAP). Geophysics57, 986–993.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. WeckmannU., MaguniaA. and RitterO.2005. Effective noise separation for magnetotelluric single site data processing using a frequency domain selection scheme. Geophysical Journal International161(3), 635–652.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WithersR., EggersD., FoxT. and CrebsT.1994. A case study of integrated hydrocarbon exploration through basalt. Geophysics59, 666–1679.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12278
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12278
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Electromagnetic; Sub‐basalt

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error