1887
Volume 64 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In the traditional inversion of the Rayleigh dispersion curve, layer thickness, which is the second most sensitive parameter of modelling the Rayleigh dispersion curve, is usually assumed as correct and is used as fixed information. Because the knowledge of the layer thickness is typically not precise, the use of such information may result in the traditional Rayleigh dispersion curve inversions getting trapped in some local minima and may show results that are far from the real solution. In this study, we try to avoid this issue by using a joint inversion of the Rayleigh dispersion curve data with vertical electric sounding data, where we use the common‐layer thickness to couple the two methods. The key idea of the proposed joint inversion scheme is to combine methods in one joint Jacobian matrix and to invert for layer S‐wave velocity, resistivity, and layer thickness as an additional parameter, in contrast with a traditional Rayleigh dispersion curve inversion. The proposed joint inversion approach is tested with noise‐free and Gaussian noise data on six characteristic, synthetic sub‐surface models: a model with a typical dispersion; a low‐velocity, half‐space model; a model with particularly stiff and soft layers, respectively; and a model reproduced from the stiff and soft layers for different layer‐resistivity propagation. In the joint inversion process, the non‐linear damped least squares method is used together with the singular value decomposition approach to find a proper damping value for each iteration. The proposed joint inversion scheme tests many damping values, and it chooses the one that best approximates the observed data in the current iteration. The quality of the joint inversion is checked with the relative distance measure. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is performed for the typical dispersive sub‐surface model to illustrate the benefits of the proposed joint scheme. The results of synthetic models revealed that the combination of the Rayleigh dispersion curve and vertical electric sounding methods in a joint scheme allows to provide reliable sub‐surface models even in complex and challenging situations and without using any information.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12289
2015-07-14
2020-05-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BaşokurA.T.1984. A numerical direct interpretation method of resistivity soundings using the Pekeris model. Geophysical Prospecting32, 1131–1146.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BergeP.A., BerrymanJ.G., Bertete‐AguirreH., BonnerP., RobertsJ.J. and WildenschildD.2000. Joint inversion of geophysical data for site characterization and restoration monitoring. In: LLNL Rep. UCRL‐ID‐128343, Proj. 55411. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BoieroD., SoccoV.L., StoccoS. and WisenR.2013. Bedrock mapping in shallow environments using surface‐wave analysis. The Leading Edge32(6), 664–672.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Calderon‐MaciasC. and LukeB.2007. Improved parameterization to invert Rayleigh‐wave data for shallow profiles containing stiff inclusions. Geophysics72, U1–U10.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CominaC., FotiS., SambuelliL., SoccoL.V. and StrobbiaC.2002. Joınt inversion of VES and surface wave data. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Las Vegas, Nevada.
  6. De NardisR., CardarelliE. and DobrokaM.2005. Quasi‐2D hybrid joint inversion of seismic and geoelectric data. Geophysical Prospecting53, 705–716.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DobrokaM., GyulaiA., OrmosT., CsokasJ. and DresenL.1991. Joint inversion of seismic and geoelectric data recorded in an underground coal mine. Geophysical Prospecting39, 643–665.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GallardoL.2004. Joint two‐dimensional inversion of geoelectromagnetıc and seismic refraction data wıth cross‐gradients constraint. PhD Thesis, Lancaster University, U.K.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GhoshD.P.1971. Inverse filter coefficients for the computation of apparent resistivity standard curves for a horizontally stratified Earth. Geophysical Prospecting19, 769–775.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HaberE. and OldenburgD.1997. Joint inversion: A structural approach. Inverse Problems13, 63–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HeringA., MisiekR., GyulaiA., DobrokaM. and DresenL.1995. A joint inversion algorithm to process geoelectric and surface wave seismic data. Part I: basic ideas. Geophysical Prospecting43, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HuangH. and FraserD.C.2003. Inversion of helicopter electromagnetic data to a magnetic conductive layered earth. Geophysics68(4), 1211–1223.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. JuliaJ., AmmonC.J., HerrmannR.B. and CorreigA.M.2000. Joint inversion of receiver function and surface wave dispersion observations. Geophysical Journal International143(1), 99–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JohansenH.K.1975. An interactive computer/graphic‐display‐terminal system for interpretation of resistivity soundings. Geophysical Prospecting23, 449–458.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. JohansenH.K.1977. A man/computer interpretation system for resistivity soundings over a horizontally stratified earth. Geophysical Prospecting25, 667–691.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KoefoedO.1970. A fast method for determining the layer distribution from the raised kernel function. Geophysical Prospecting18, 564–570.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LaiC.G. and RixG.J.1998. Simultaneous Inversion of Rayleigh Phase Velocity and Attenuation for Near‐Surface Site Characterization. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MarquardtD.W.1963. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics2, 431–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MejuM.A.1992. An effective ridge regression procedure for resistivity data inversion. Computers and Geosciences18, 99–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MejuM.A., GallardoL.A. and MohamedA.K.2003. Evidence for correlation of electrical resistivity and seismic velocity in heterogeneous near‐surface materials. Geophysical Research Letters30(7).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MillerG.F. and PurseyH.1955. On the partition of energy between elastic waves in a semi‐infinite solid. Proceedings of Royal Society of London, Series A233, 55–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MoorkampM., HeinckeB., JegenM., RobertsA.W. and HoobsR.W.2011. A framework for 3‐D joint inversion of MT, gravity and seismic refraction data. Geophysical Journal International184, 477–493.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. NazarianS. and StokoeIIK.H.1984. In situ shear wave velocity from spectral analysis of surface waves. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Earthquake Engineering‐ San Francisco, Vol. 3, pp. 31–38. Prentice–Hall, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PiattiC., SoccoL.V., BoieroD. and FotiS.2013. Constrained 1D joint inversion of seismic surface waves and P‐refraction traveltimes. Geophysical Prospecting61(1), 77–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. RodriguezJ.C.1978. Inversion of TDEM (near‐zone) sounding curves with catalog interpolation. Quarterly Journal of the Colorado School of Mines73, 57–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. RomaV.2001. Soil properties and site characterization by means of rayleigh waves. PhD thesis, Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Technical University of Turin, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SenkayaM. and KarsliH.2013. Sensitivity analysis in near surface rayleigh wave phase velocities inversion. The 20th International Geophysical Congress and Exhibition of Turkey, Antalya, Turkey, November 2013, Abstract CD, S46, P.195–198.
  28. SoccoL.V. and BoieroD.2008. Improved Monte Carlo inversion of surface wave data. Geophysical Prospecting56, 357–371.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. TarantolaA.2005. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. VozoffK. and JuppD.L.B.1975. Joint inversion of geophysical data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society42, 977–991.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. WerthmüllerD., ZiolkowskiA. and WrightD.Background resistivity model from seismic velocities. Geophysics78(4), E213–E223.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. XiaJ., MillerR.D. and ParkC.B.1999. Estimation of near‐surface shear‐wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics64, 691–700.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. XiaJ., ShenC. and XuY.2013. Near‐surface shear‐wave velocities and quality factors derived from high‐frequency surface waves. The Leading Edge32(6), 612–618.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. XiaJ., XuY., MillerR.D. and ChenC.2006. Estimation of elastic moduli in a compressible gibson half‐space by inverting rayleigh‐wave phase velocity. Surveys in Geophysics27, 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ZhangJ. and MorganF.D.1996. Joint seismic and electrical tomography. In: Proceedings of the EEGS Symposium on Applications of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ZhdanovM.2002. Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12289
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12289
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error