Optimal implicit staggered‐grid finite‐difference schemes based on the sampling approximation method for seismic modelling

References

1. AbokhodairA.A.2009. Complex differentiation tools for geophysical inversion. Geophysics74, H1–H11.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BansalR. and SenM.K.2008. Finite‐difference modelling of S‐wave splitting in anisotropic media. Geophysical Prospecting56, 293–312.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ChangS. and LiuY.2013. A truncated implicit high‐order finite‐difference scheme combined with boundary conditions. Applied Geophysics10, 53–62.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ChuC.2009. Seismic modeling and imaging with the Fourier method: numerical analyses and parallel implementation strategies. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ChuC. and StoffaP.L.2010. Frequency domain modeling using implicit spatial finite difference operators. 80thSEG Annual International Meeting, Denver, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 3076–3080.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChuC. and StoffaP.L.2012a. Implicit finite‐difference simulations of seismic wave propagation. Geophysics77, T57–T67.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ChuC. and StoffaP.L.2012b. Nonuniform grid implicit spatial finite difference method for acoustic wave modeling in tilted transversely isotropic media. Journal of Applied Geophysics76, 44–49.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ClaerboutJ.F.1985. Imaging the Earth's Interior. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DongL., MaZ. and CaoJ.2000. A study on stability of the staggered‐grid high‐order difference method of first‐order elastic wave equation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese) 43, 856–864.
   [Google Scholar]
10. EmermanS., SchmidtW. and StephenR.1982. An implicit finite‐difference formulation of the elastic wave equation. Geophysics47, 1521–1526.
    [Google Scholar]
11. FornbergB.1998. Calculation of weights in finite difference formulas. SIAM Review40, 685–691.
    [Google Scholar]
12. KomatitschD. and VilotteJ.1998. The spectral element method: An efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America88, 368–392.
    [Google Scholar]
13. KosloffD. and BaysalE.1982. Forward modeling by a Fourier method. Geophysics47, 1402–1412.
    [Google Scholar]
14. KosloffD., PestanaR. and Tal‐EzerH.2008. Numerical solution of the constant density acoustic wave equation by implicit spatial derivative operators. SEG 78th Annual International Meeting, Las Vegas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 2057–2061.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KosloffD., PestanaR. and Tal‐EzerH.2010. Acoustic and elastic numerical wave simulations by recursive spatial derivative operators. Geophysics75, T167–T174.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LisitsaV. and VishnevskiyD.2010. Lebedev scheme for the numerical simulation of wave propagation in 3D anisotropic elasticity. Geophysical Prospecting58, 619–635.
    [Google Scholar]
17. LiuY.2014. Optimal staggered‐grid finite‐difference schemes based on least‐squares for wave equation modelling. Geophysical Journal International197, 1033–1047.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LiuY. and SenM.K.2009a. A practical implicit finite‐difference method: examples from seismic modeling. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering6, 231–249.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LiuY. and SenM.K.2009b. An implicit staggered‐grid finite‐difference method for seismic modeling. Geophysical Journal International179, 459–474.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LiuY. and SenM.K.2011. Scalar wave equation modeling with time‐space domain dispersion‐relation‐based staggered‐grid finite‐difference schemes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101, 141–159.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McClellanJ.H. and ParksT.W.1972. Equiripple approximation of fan filters. Geophysics37, 573–583.
    [Google Scholar]
22. VirieuxJ.1984. SH‐wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity stress finite‐difference method. Geophysics49, 1933–1957.
    [Google Scholar]
23. VirieuxJ.1986. P‐SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity stress finite difference method. Geophysics51, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
24. VirieuxJ., CalandraH. and PlessixR.2011. A review of the spectral, pseudo‐spectral, finite‐difference and finite‐element modeling techniques for geophysical imaging. Geophysical Prospecting59, 794–813.
    [Google Scholar]
25. VishnevskyD., LisitsaV., TcheverdaV. and ReshetovaG.2014. Numerical study of the interface errors of finite‐difference simulations of seismic waves. Geophysics79, T219–T232.
    [Google Scholar]
26. WuW., LinesL.R. and LuH.1996. Analysis of higher‐order, finite‐difference schemes in 3‐D reverse time migration. Geophysics61, 845–856.
    [Google Scholar]
27. YanH. and LiuY.2013. Visco‐acoustic pre‐stack reverse‐time migration based on the time‐space domain adaptive high‐order finite‐difference method. Geophysical Prospecting61, 941–954.
    [Google Scholar]
28. YangL., YanH. and LiuH.2014. Least squares staggered‐grid finite‐difference for elastic wave modeling. Exploration Geophysics45(4), 255–260.
    [Google Scholar]
29. ZhangH., ZhangY. and SunJ.2007. Implicit splitting finite difference scheme for multi‐dimensional wave simulation. SEG 77th Annual International Meeting, San Antonio, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 2011–2015.
    [Google Scholar]
30. ZhouH. and ZhangG.2011. Prefactored optimized compact finite difference schemes for second spatial derivatives. Geophysics76, WB87–WB95.
    [Google Scholar]