1887
Volume 65, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We present a parsimonious wave‐equation travel‐time inversion technique for refraction waves. A dense virtual refraction dataset can be generated from just two reciprocal shot gathers for the sources at the endpoints of the survey line, with geophones evenly deployed along the line. These two reciprocal shots contain approximately 2 refraction travel times, which can be spawned into refraction travel times by an interferometric transformation. Then, these virtual refraction travel times are used with a source wavelet to create virtual refraction shot gathers, which are the input data for wave‐equation travel‐time inversion. Numerical results show that the parsimonious wave‐equation travel‐time tomogram has about the same accuracy as the tomogram computed by standard wave‐equation travel‐time inversion. The most significant benefit is that a reciprocal survey is far less time consuming than the standard refraction survey where a source is excited at each geophone location.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12488
2017-02-14
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ByrdR.H., NocedalJ. and SchnabelR.B.1994. Representations of quasi‐Newton matrices and their use in limited memory methods. Mathematical Programming63, 129–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DongS., ShengJ. and SchusterG.T.2006. Theory and practice of refraction interferometry. 76th SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3021–3025.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HanafyS. and SchusterG.2016. Parsimonious refraction interferometry. 86th SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2339–2343.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HoleJ.1992. Nonlinear high‐resolution three‐dimensional seismic travel time tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth97, 6553–6562.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KlingerY., RiveraL., HaesslerH. and MaurinJ.‐C.1999. Active faulting in the Gulf of Aqaba: new knowledge from the Mw 7.3 earthquake of 22 November 1995. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America89, 1025–1036.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KorenagaJ., HolbrookW., KentG., KelemenP., DetrickR., LarsenH.‐C.et al. 2000. Crustal structure of the southeast Greenland margin from joint refraction and reflection seismic tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth105, 21591–21614.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LanzE., MaurerH. and GreenA.G.1998. Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site. Geophysics63, 1414–1433.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LuoY. and SchusterG.T.1991. Wave‐equation traveltime inversion. Geophysics56, 645–653.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ProdehlC. and MooneyW.D.2012. Exploring the Earth's Crust: History and Results of Controlled‐Source Seismology, Vol. 208. Geological Society of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SchusterG., HuangY., HanafyS.M., ZhouM., YuJ. and AlhaganO.2014. Review on improved seismic imaging with closure phase. Geophysics79, W11–W25.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SchusterG.T.2005. Fermat's interferometric principle for target‐oriented traveltime tomography. Geophysics70, U47–U50.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SteinS. and WysessionM.2009. An Introduction to Seismology, Earthquakes, and Earth Structure. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. WhiteD.J. and ClowesR.1990. Shallow crustal structure beneath the Juan de Fuca Ridge from 2‐D seismic refraction tomography. Geophysical Journal International100, 349–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ZhangJ. and ToksozM.N.1998. Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography. Geophysics63, 1726–1737.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12488
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12488
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition; Refraction tomography; WT

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error