1887
Volume 65, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In fractured reservoirs, seismic wave velocity and amplitude depend on frequency and incidence angle. Frequency dependence is believed to be principally caused by the wave‐induced flow of pore fluid at the mesoscopic scale. In recent years, two particular phenomena, i.e., patchy saturation and flow between fractures and pores, have been identified as significant mechanisms of wave‐induced flow. However, these two phenomena are studied separately. Recently, a unified model has been proposed for a porous rock with a set of aligned fractures, with pores and fractures filled with two different fluids. Existing models treat waves propagating perpendicular to the fractures. In this paper, we extend the model to all propagation angles by assuming that the flow direction is perpendicular to the layering plane and is independent of the loading direction. We first consider the limiting cases through poroelastic Backus averaging, and then we obtain the five complex and frequency‐dependent stiffness values of the equivalent transversely isotropic medium as a function of the frequency. The numerical results show that, when the bulk modulus of the fracture‐filling fluid is relatively large, the dispersion and attenuation of P‐waves are mainly caused by fractures, and the values decrease as angles increase, almost vanishing when the incidence angle is 90° (propagation parallel to the fracture plane). While the bulk modulus of fluid in fractures is much smaller than that of matrix pores, the attenuation due to the “partial saturation” mechanism makes the fluid flow from pores into fractures, which is almost independent of the incidence angle.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12505
2017-03-30
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AmalokwuK., ChapmanM., BestA.I., MinshullT.A. and LiX.Y.2015. Water saturation effects on P‐wave anisotropy in synthetic sandstone with aligned fractures. Geophysical Journal International202, 1088–1095.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BackusG.E.1962. Long‐wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering. Journal of Geophysical Research67, 4427–4440.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BehuraJ. and TsvankinI.2009. Role of the inhomogeneity angle in anisotropic attenuation analysis. Geophysics74, WB177–WB191.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BiotM.A.1962. Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. Journal of Applied Physics33, 1482–1498.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrajanovskiM., GurevichB. and SchoenbergM.2005. A model for P‐wave attenuation and dispersion in a porous medium permeated by aligned fractures. Geophysical Journal International163, 372–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BrajanovskiM., MüllerT.M. and ParraJ.O.2010. A model for strong attenuation and dispersion of seismic P‐waves in a partially saturated fractured reservoir. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy53(8), 1383–1387.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CarcioneJ.M.2001. Wave Fields in Real Media: Wave Propagation in Anisotropic, Anelastic, and Porous Media. Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CarcioneJ.M., SantosJ.E. and PicottiS.2011. Anisotropic poroelasticity and wave‐induced fluid flow: harmonic finite‐element simulations. Geophysical Journal International186, 1245–1254.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CarcioneJ.M., GurevichB., SantosJ.E. and PicottiS.2013. Angle and frequency‐dependent wave velocity and attenuation in fractured porous media. Pure and Applied Geophysics1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ChapmanM.2003. Frequency dependent anisotropy due to mesoscale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting51, 369–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ChichininaT., SabininV. and Ronquillo‐JarilloG.2006. QVOA analysis: P‐wave attenuation anisotropy for fracture characterization. Geophysics71, C37–C48.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ColletO. and GurevichB.2016. Frequency dependence of anisotropy in fluid saturated rocks—Part I: aligned cracks case. Geophysical Prospecting64(4), 1067–1084.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GalvinR.J. and GurevichB.2009. Effective properties of a poroelastic medium containing a distribution of aligned cracks. Journal of Geophysical Research114, B07305.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GalvinR.J. and GurevichB.2015. Frequency dependent anisotropy of porous rocks with aligned fractures. Geophysical Prospecting63, 141–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Zürich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GelinskyS. and ShapiroS.A.1997. Poroelastic Backus averaging for anisotropic layered fluid‐ and gas‐saturated sediments. Geophysics62, 1867–1878.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. GistG.A.1994. Interpreting laboratory velocity measurements in partially gas‐saturated rocks. Geophysics59, 1100–1109.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GurevichB.2003. Elastic properties of saturated porous rocks with aligned fractures. Journal of Applied Geophysics54(3), 203–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. GurevichB. and LopatnikovS.L.1995. Velocity and attenuation of elastic waves in finely layered porous rocks. Geophysical Journal International121, 933–947.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GurevichB., BrajanovskiM. and GalvinR.J.et al. 2009. P‐wave dispersion and attenuation in fractured and porous reservoirs – poroelasticity approach. Geophysical Prospecting57(2), 225–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HudsonJ.A., PointerT. and LiuE.2001. Effective‐medium theories for fluid‐saturated materials with aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting49, 509–522.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. JakobsenM., JohansenT.A. and McCannC.2003. The acoustic signature of fluid flow in complex porous media. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 219–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. JohnsonD.L.2001. Theory of frequency dependent acoustics in patchy saturated porous media. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America110, 682–694.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KongL.Y., GurevichB., MüllerT.M., WangY.B. and YangH.Z.2013. Effect of fracture fill on seismic attenuation and dispersion in fractured porous rocks. Geophysical Journal International195(3), 1679–1688.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. KriefM., GaratJ., StellingwerffJ. and VentreJ.1990. A petrophysical interpretation using the velocities of P and S waves (full‐waveform sonic). The Log Analyst31, 355–369.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KrzikallaF. and MüllerT.M.2011. Anisotropic P‐SV‐wave dispersion and attenuation due to inter‐layer flow in thinly layered porous rocks. Geophysics76, WA135.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. LambertG., GurevichB. and BrajanovskiM.2005. Frequency‐dependent anisotropy of porous rocks with aligned fractures. Poromechanics III: Proceedings of the 3rd Biot Conference on Poromechanics, 309–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MüllerT.M., GurevichB. and LebedevM.2010. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion due to wave‐induced flow in porous rocks – a review. Geophysics75, A147–A164.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. NorrisA.N.1993. Low‐frequency dispersion and attenuation in partially saturated rocks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America94, 359–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PrideS.R.2003. Permeability dependence of seismic amplitudes. The Leading Edge22(6), 518–525.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PrideS.R., BerrymanJ.G. and HarrisJ.M.2004. Seismic attenuation due to wave induced flow. Journal of Geophysical Research109 (B1), B01201.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. RasolofosaonP.N.2010. Generalized anisotropy parameters and approximations of attenuations and velocities in viscoelastic media of arbitrary anisotropy type—Theoretical and experimental aspects. Geophysical Prospecting58(4), 637–655.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SchoenbergM.1980. Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1516–1521.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SchoenbergM. and DoumaJ.1988. Elastic‐wave propagation in media with parallel fractures and aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting36, 571–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51(10), 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. TomsJ., MüllerT.M. and GurevichB.2007. Seismic attenuation in porous rocks with random patchy saturation. Geophysical Prospecting55, 671–678.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. VavryčukV.2007. Ray velocity and ray attenuation in homogeneous anisotropic viscoelastic media. Geophysics72, D119–D127.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. VavryčukV.2008. Velocity, attenuation and quality factor in anisotropic viscoelastic media: a perturbation approach. Geophysics73(5), D63–D73.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. WhiteJ.E.1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics40, 224–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. WhiteJ.E.1983. Underground Sound: Application of Seismic Waves. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. WhiteJ.E., MikhaylovaN.G. and LyakhovitskyF.M.1975. Low‐frequency seismic waves in fluid saturated layered rocks. Physics of the Solid Earth11, 654–659. Izvestiya Academy of Sciences USSR.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. ZhuY. and TsvankinI.2006. Plane‐wave propagation in attenuative transversely isotropic media. Geophysics71(2), T17–T30.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12505
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12505
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy; Attenuation; Rock physics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error