1887
Volume 66, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Extrapolating wavefields and imaging at each depth during three‐dimensional recursive wave‐equation migration is a time‐consuming endeavor. For efficiency, most commercial techniques extrapolate wavefields through thick slabs followed by wavefield interpolation within each thick slab. In this article, we develop this strategy by associating more efficient interpolators with a Fourier‐transform‐related wavefield extrapolation method. First, we formulate a three‐dimensional first‐order separation‐of‐variables screen propagator for large‐step wavefield extrapolation, which allows for wide‐angle propagations in highly contrasting media. This propagator significantly improves the performance of the split‐step Fourier method in dealing with significant lateral heterogeneities at the cost of only one more fast Fourier transform in each thick slab. We then extend the two‐dimensional Kirchhoff and Born–Kirchhoff local wavefield interpolators to three‐dimensional cases for each slab. The three‐dimensional Kirchhoff interpolator is based on the traditional Kirchhoff formula and applies to moderate lateral velocity variations, whereas the three‐dimensional Born–Kirchhoff interpolator is derived from the Lippmann–Schwinger integral equation under the Born approximation and is adapted to highly laterally varying media. Numerical examples on the three‐dimensional salt model of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists/European Association of Geoscientists demonstrate that three‐dimensional first‐order separation‐of‐variables screen propagator Born–Kirchhoff depth migration using thick‐slab wavefield extrapolation plus thin‐slab interpolation tolerates a considerable depth‐step size of up to 72 ms, eventually resulting in an efficiency improvement of nearly 80% without obvious loss of imaging accuracy. Although the proposed three‐dimensional interpolators are presented with one‐way Fourier extrapolation methods, they can be extended for applications to general migration methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12519
2017-04-19
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BambergerA., EngquistB., HalpernL. and JolyP.1988. Higher order paraxial wave equation approximations in heterogeneous media. SIAM Journal on Applied Mat hematics48(1), 129–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BevcD.1997. Flooding the topography: Wave‐equation datuming of land data with rugged acquisition topography. Geophysics, 62, 1558–1569.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ChengN., ChengC.H. and ToksözM.N.1996. Error analysis of phase screen method in 3‐D. Geophysical Research Letters23, 1841–1844.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ClaerboutJ.F.1985. Imaging the Earth's Interior. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CollinsM.D.1993. A split‐step Padé solution for the parabolic equation method. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America93, 1736–1742.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DongW., FuL.Y., XiaoY.J., GuanX.Z. and WuC.2011. Quantitative analysis of the complexity in seismic exploration of the high and steep. Chinese Journal of Geophysics54(6), 1600–1613.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De HoopM., Le RousseauJ. and WuR.S.2000. Generalization of the phase‐screen approximation for the scattering of acoustic waves. Wave Motion31, 43–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FrenchW.S.1975. Computer migration of oblique seismic reflection profiles. Geophysics40, 6–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FuL.Y.2004. Wavefield interpolation in the Fourier wavefield extrapolation. Geophysics69(1), 257–264.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FuL.Y.2005. Broadband constant‐coefficient propagators. Geophysical Prospecting53, 299–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FuL.Y.2006. Comparison of different one‐way propagators for wave forward propagation in heterogeneous crustal wave guides. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 1091–1113.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FuL.Y.2010. Quantitative assessment of the complexity of geological structures in terms of seismic propagators. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences53, 54–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FuL.Y., MuY.G. and YangH.J.1997. Forward problem of nonlinear Fredholm integral equation in reference medium via velocity‐weighted wavefield function. Geophysics62, 650–656.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. FuL.Y., XiaoY.J., SunW.J., WuC., GuanX.Z. and ZhangJ.Z.2013. Seismic imaging studies of complex high and steep structure in Kuqa depression. Chinese Journal of Geophysics56(6), 1985–2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GazdagJ. and SguazzeroP.1984. Migration of seismic data by phase shift plus interpolation. Geophysics49, 124–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HalpernL. and TrefethenL.N.1988. Wide‐angle one‐way wave equations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84, 1397–1404.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HuangL.J. and FehlerM.C.1998. Accuracy analysis of the split‐step Fourier propagator: implications for seismic modeling and migration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America88, 18–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HuangL.J., FehlerM.C. and WuR.S.1999. Extended local Born Fourier migration method. Geophysics64, 1524–1534.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KessingerW.1992. Extended split‐step Fourier migration. 62nd SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 917–920.
  20. Le RousseauJ.H. and De HoopM.V.2001. Modeling and imaging with the scalar generalized‐screen algorithms in isotropic media. Geophysics66, 1551–1568.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LiuL. and ZhangJ.2006. 3D wavefield extrapolation with optimum split‐step Fourier method. Geophysics71, T95–T108.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RistowD. and RühlT.1994. Fourier finite‐difference migration. Geophysics59, 1882–1893.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SchleicherJ., HubralP., TygelM. and JayaM.S.1997. Minimum apertures and Fresnel zones in migration and demigration. Geophysics, 62, 183–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SchneiderW.A.1978. Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions. Geophysics43, 49–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. StoffaP.L., FakkemaJ.T., de Luna FreireR.M. and KessingerW.P.1990. Split‐step Fourier migration. Geophysics55, 410–421.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. TappertF.D.1977. The parabolic approximation method. In: Wave Propagation and Underwater Acoustics, pp. 224–287. Springer‐Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ThomsonD.J.1990. Wide‐angle parabolic equation solutions to two range‐dependent benchmark problems. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America87, 1514–1520.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. TrefethenL.N. and HalpernL.1986. Well‐posedness of one‐way equations and absorbing boundary conditions. Mathematics of Computation147, 421–435.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. WuR.S.1996. Synthetic seismogram in heterogeneous media by one‐return approximation. Pure and Applied Geophysics148, 155–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WuR.S. and JinS.1997. Windowed GSP (generalized screen propagators) migration applied to SEG‐EAEG salt model data. 67th SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1746–1749.
  31. YilmazO.1987. Seismic Data Processing. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ZhangJ.H., WangW.M., WangS.Q. and YaoZ.X.2010. Optimized Chebyshev Fourier migration: a wide‐angle dual‐domain method for media with strong velocity contrasts. Geophysics75(2), S23–S34.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12519
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12519
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error