Accuracy‐constrained optimisation methods for staggered‐grid elastic wave modelling

References

1. AlfordR.M., KellyK.R. and BooreD.M.1974. Accuracy of finite‐difference modeling of the acoustic wave equation. Geophysics39, 834–842.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AltermanZ. and KaralF.1968. Propagation of elastic waves in layered median by finite differences methods. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America58, 367–398.
   [Google Scholar]
3. CerjanC., KosloffD., KosloffR. and ReshefM.1985. A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations. Geophysics50, 705–708.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ChenJ.‐B.2011. A stability formula for Lax‐Wendroff methods with fourthorder in time and general‐order in space for the scalar wave equation. Geophysics, 76(2), T37–T42.
   [Google Scholar]
5. DablainM.A.1986. The application of high‐order differencing to the scalar wave equation. Geophysics51, 54–66.
   [Google Scholar]
6. FornbergB.1987. The pseudospectral method: comparisons with finite differences for the elastic wave equation. Geophysics52, 483–501.
   [Google Scholar]
7. FornbergB.1988. Generation of finite difference formulas on arbitrarily spaced grids. Mathematics of Computation51, 699–706.
   [Google Scholar]
8. FornbergB.1990. High‐order finite difference and the pseudospectral method on staggered grids. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis27, 904–918.
   [Google Scholar]
9. FornbergB.1996. A Practical Guide to Pseudospectral Method. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GolubG.H. and Van LoanC.F.1996. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. HolbergO.1987. Computational aspects of the choice of operator and sampling interval for numerical differentiation in large‐scale simulation of wave phenomena. Gophysical Prospecting35, 629–655.
    [Google Scholar]
12. HouseB., LarsenS. and BednarJ.B.2000. 3‐D elastic numerical modeling of a complex salt structure. 70th annual meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2201–2204.
13. KellyK.R., TreitelS. and AlfordR.M.1976. Synthetic seismograms: a finite difference approach. Geophysics41, 12–27.
    [Google Scholar]
14. LevanderA.R.1988. Fourth‐order finite‐difference P‐SV seismograms. Geophysics53, 1425–1436.
    [Google Scholar]
15. LinesL.R., SlawinskiR.S. and BordingR.P.1999. A recipe for stability of finite‐difference wave‐equation computations. Geophysics64, 967–969.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LiuY.2014. Optimal staggered‐grid finite‐difference schemes based on leastsquares for wave equation modelling. Geophysical Journal International197, 1033–1047.
    [Google Scholar]
17. LiuY. and SenM.K.2009. An implicit staggered‐grid finite‐difference for seismic modelling. Geophysical Journal International179, 459–474.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MittetR.2002. Free‐surface boundary conditions for elastic staggered modeling schemes. Geophysics67, 1616–1623.
    [Google Scholar]
19. TamC.K.W. and WebbJ.C.1993. Dispersion‐relation‐preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics107, 262–281.
    [Google Scholar]
20. VirieuxJ.1986. P‐SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity stress finite difference method. Geophysics51, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
21. XuY.X., XiaJ.H. and MillerR.D.2007. Numerical investigation of implementation of air‐earth boundary by acoustic‐elastic boundary approach. Geophysics72, SM147–SM153.
    [Google Scholar]
22. YangL., YanH.Y. and LiuH.2014. Least squares staggered‐grid finitedifference for elastic wave modeling. Exploration Geophysics45, 255–260.
    [Google Scholar]