1887
Volume 67 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Since its introduction in the late 1950s, hydraulic vibrators have become the dominant source for land seismic surveys. The hydraulic vibrators typically used for commercial land seismic acquisition, however, are large, costly to operate and expensive to purchase. This inhibits their use for small‐scale and short‐duration surveys as well as Vibroseis research. In this paper we describe, in detail, the construction of a portable vibrator from commercially available components for a cost of less than $US2,000. Data shows that the vibrator is able to successfully transmit sweeps from 15 to 180 Hz with different spectral contents. The vibrator produces a stronger signal than a sledgehammer and we estimate its output to be around 1 kN. The frequency content of the data was concentrated at lower frequencies (<100 Hz) and the ground‐roll was far more energetic than that produced using a sledgehammer.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12645
2018-07-04
2020-07-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BagainiC., DeanT., QuigleyJ. and TiteG.‐A.2008. Systems and methods for enhancing low‐frequency content in Vibroseis acquisition. US Patent 7327633.
  2. BatesC.R., PhillipsD. and HoekstraB.1995. Mini vibrators in seismic acquisition. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1995, pp. 1007–1009. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BrewerK., CartwrightT. and PuginA.2013. The microvibe, a new multi‐component portable seismic vibrator. In: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2013 (ed B.D.Smith), pp. 786–786. Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DeanT., QuigleyJ., MacDonaldS. and ReadmanC.2016. The design of optimized broadband vibroseis sweeps. The Leading Edge35, 684–688.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DeanT., VermeerP.L., LaycockM., TulettJ. and LaneD., 2015. The complexity of vibrator baseplate‐ground interaction measured with a thin‐film pressure pad and a downhole tool. 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Madrid, Spain, June 2015.
  6. HainesS.S.2006. Design and application of an electromagnetic vibrator seismic source. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics11, 9–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KaidaY.1995. High‐resolution shallow subsurface mapping using a portable seismic vibrator. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1997, pp. 796–799.
  8. KaidaY., MatsubaraM., GhoseR. and KanemoriT.1995. Very shallow seismic reflection profiling using portable vibrator. In: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 1995, pp. 601–607. Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KrawczykC.M., PolomU. and BeileckeT.2013. Shear‐wave reflection seismics as a valuable tool for near‐surface urban applications. The Leading Edge32, 256–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KrawczykC.M., PolomU., TrabsS. and DahmT.2012. Sinkholes in the city of Hamburg—New urban shear‐wave reflection seismic system enables high‐resolution imaging of subrosion structures. Journal of Applied Geophysics78, 133–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LebedevA. and BeresnevI.2005. Radiation from flexural vibrations of the baseplate and their effect on the accuracy of traveltime measurements. Geophysical Prospecting53, 543–555.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MatsubaraY., KaidaY., OsadaM. and TakahashiT.1994. High‐resolution shallow seismic reflection profiling using portable vibrator. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts1994, pp. 598–601.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MatsubaraY., TakahashiT., GhoseR. and KaidaY.1995. Very shallow subsurface imaging using a portable vibrator. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts1995, pp. 415–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MatsubaraY., YamamotoM., NobuokaD. and KaidaY.2002. High‐resolution shallow seismic reflection using a portable S‐wave vibrator. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2002, pp. 1618–1621.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MillerR.D., XiaJ., RiceD., WaltersS.L. and RademackerT.R.2009. Near‐surface utility of vibroseis. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2009, pp. 1330–1334.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. NijhofV.1990. Portable high‐frequency vibrator implemented in a compact PC‐based seismic system. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts1990, pp. 942–943.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. NijhofV.P.B.J.1989. Portable, high‐frequency vibrator forh high‐resolution shallow seismic profiling. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts1989, pp. 670–671.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. NoorlandtR., DrijkoningenG., DamsJ. and JenneskensR.2015. A seismic vertical vibrator driven by linear synchronous motors. Geophysics80, EN57–EN67.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ParkC.B., MillerR.D. and XiaJ.1999. Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics64, 800–808.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PolomU., RønningJ.S., TassisG., GelleinJ. and DruivengaG.2017. Building site investigation by joint shear wave reflection seismic and geotechnical drilling at Tønsberg hospital area, eastern Norway. First Break35, 63–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PuginA., BrewerK., CartwrightT., PullanS.E., PerretD., CrowH. et al. 2013. Near surface S‐wave seismic reflection profiling– new approaches and insights. First Break31, 49–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SallasJ.J.1984. Seismic vibrator control and the downgoing P‐wave. Geophysics49, 732–740.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SaragiotisC., ScholtzP. and BagainiC.2010. On the accuracy of the ground force estimated in vibroseis acquisition. Geophysical Prospecting58, 69–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SeriffA.J. and KimW.H.1970. The effect of harmonic distrortion in the use of vibratory surface sources. Geophysics35, 234–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. TakahashiT., NobuokaD., KaidaY., BrouwerJ. and NijhofV.2000. Shallow subsurface seismic impedance mapping using a portable vibrator. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2000, pp. 1263–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. TellierN., CaradecG. and OllivrinG.2015. Practical solutions for effective vibrator high‐frequency generation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2015, pp. 201–205.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WeiZ.2008. Design of a p‐wave seismic vibrator with advanced performance. GeoArabia13, 123–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WeiZ.2009. How good is the weighted‐sum estimate of the vibrator ground force? The Leading Edge28, 960–965.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. WeiZ.2015. A small broadband vibrator for improved down‐going P‐wave. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2015, pp. 276–280.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12645
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12645
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Near‐surface and Seismic acquisition
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error