1887
Volume 66, Issue 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We study a new marine electromagnetic configuration that consists of a ship‐towed inductive source transmitter and a series of remote electric dipole receivers placed on the seafloor. The approach was tested at the Palinuro Seamount in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea, at a site where massive sulphide mineralization has been previously identified by shallow drilling. A 3D model of the Palinuro study area was created using bathymetry data, and forward modelling of the electric field diffusion was carried out using a finite volume method. These numerical results suggest that the remote receivers can theoretically detect a block of shallowly buried conductive material at up to ∼100 m away when the transmitter is located directly above the target. We also compared the sensitivity of the method using either a horizontal loop transmitter or a vertical loop transmitter and found that when either transmitter is located directly above the mineralized zone, the vertical loop transmitter has sensitivity to the target at a farther distance than the horizontal loop transmitter in the broadside direction by a few tens of metres. Furthermore, the vertical loop transmitter is more effective at distinguishing the seafloor conductivity structure when the vertical separation between transmitter and receiver is large due to the bathymetry. As a horizontal transmitter is logistically easier to deploy, we conducted a first test of the method with a horizontal transmitter. Apparent conductivities are calculated from the electric field transients recorded at the remote receivers. The analysis indicates higher apparent seafloor conductivities when the transmitter is located near the mineralized zone. Forward modelling suggests that the best match to the apparent conductivity data is obtained when the mineralized zone is extended southward by 40 m beyond the zone of previous drilling. Our results demonstrate that the method adds value to the exploration and characterization of seafloor massive sulphide deposits.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12646
2018-06-04
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AsakawaE., SumiT., YamakawaT. and KoseM.2016. Multi‐stage and integrated approach for seafloor Massive Sulfide (SMS) Exploration: 22nd European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Barcelona, Spain.
  2. CairnsG., EvansR. and EdwardsR.1996. A time‐domain electromagnetic survey of the TAG hydrothermal mound. Geophysical Research Letters23, 3455–3458.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Caratori TontiniF., BortoluzziG., CarmiscianoC., CocchiL., de RondeC., LigiM. et al. 2014. Near‐bottom magnetic signatures of submarine hydrothermal systems at Marsili and Palinuro Volcanoes, Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy. Economic Geology109, 2119–2128.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ConstableS.2010. Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics75, A67–A81.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ConstableS., KannbergP. and WeitemeyerK.2016. Vulcan: a deep‐towed CSEM receiver. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems17, 1042–1064.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HaberE.2015. Computational methods in geophysical electromagnetics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973808.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HölzS.2017. Cruise report POS509: geophysical investigations of sediment hosted massive sulfide deposits on the Palinuro Volcanic Complex in the Tyrrhenian Sea, Malaga (Spain)—Catania (Italy) 15.02.‐03.03.2017. GEOMAR ReportN.Ser. 039, 63 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HölzS., JegenM., PetersenS. and HanningtonM.2015a. How to find buried and inactive seafloor massive sulfides using transient electromagnetics—a case study from the Palinuro Seamount in the Tyrrhenian Sea. Underwater Mining Institute Conference, Tampa Bay, FL, pp. 1–8.
  9. HölzS., SwidinskyA., SommerM., JegenM. and BialasJ.2015b. The use of rotational invariants for the interpretation of marine CSEM data with a case study from the North Alex mud volcano, West Nile Delta. Geophysical Journal International201, 224–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KowalczykP.2008. Geophysical prelude to first exploitation of submarine massive sulphides. First Break26, 99–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LigiM., CocchiL., BortoluzziG., D'OrianoF., MucciniF., TontiniF. et al. 2014, Mapping of seafloor hydrothermally altered rocks using geophysical methods: Marsili and Palinuro seamounts, southern Tyrrhenian Sea. Economic Geology109, 2103–2117.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MacnaeJ. and IrvineR.1988. Inductive source resistivity: a tool for outlining silicification in gold exploration. Exploration Geophysics19, 471–480.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MacnaeJ., McGowanP. and LamontagneY.1989. Resistivity mapping using inductive sources. Exploration Geophysics20, 47–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MinnitiM. and BonaviaF.1984. Copper‐ore grade mineralization discovered in a seamount in the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean): is the mineralization related to porphyry‐coppers or to base metal lodes? Marine Geology59, 271–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. NakayamaK. and SaitoA.2016. The Seabed TDEM towed by ROV for the ocean bottom hydrothermal deposits. 22nd European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Barcelona, Spain.
  16. PetersenS., MoneckeT., WesthuesA., HanningtonM., GemmellJ., SharpeR. et al. 2014. Drilling shallow‐water massive sulfides at the Palinuro volcanic complex, Aeolian Island Arc, Italy. Economic Geology109, 2129–2157.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SafipourR., HölzS., HalbachJ., PetersenS., JegenM. and SwidinskyA.2017a. A self‐potential investigation of submarine massive sulfides: Palinuro Seamount, Tyrrhenian Sea. Geophysics82, A51–A56.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SafipourR., HölzS., JegenM. and SwidinskyA.2017b. On electric fields produced by inductive sources on the seafloor. Geophysics82, E297–E313.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SchwalenbergK., HaeckelM., PoortJ. and JegenM.2010a. Evaluation of gas hydrate deposits in an active seep area using marine controlled source electromagnetics: results from Opouawe Bank, Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand. Marine Geology272, 79–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SchwalenbergK., WoodW., PecherI., HamdanL., HenrysS., JegenM., et al. 2010b. Preliminary interpretation of electromagnetic, heat flow, seismic, and geochemical data for gas hydrate distribution across the Porangahua Ridge, New Zealand. Marine Geology272, 89–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SingerD. and KoudaR.2001. Some simple guides to finding useful information in exploration geochemical data. Natural Resources Research10, 137–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SwidinskyA., HölzS. and JegenM.2015. Rapid resistivity imaging for marine controlled‐source electromagnetic surveys with two transmitter polarizations: an application to the North Alex mud volcano, West Nile Delta. Geophysics80, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WeitemeyerK., ConstableS. and KeyK.2006a. First results from a marine controlled‐source electromagnetic survey to detect gas hydrates offshore Oregon. Geophysical Research Letters33, L03304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024896.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. WeitemeyerK., ConstableS. and KeyK.2006b. Marine EM techniques for gas‐hydrate detection and hazard mitigation. The Leading Edge25, 629–632.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. WolfgramP.A., EdwardsR., LawL. and BoneM.N.1986. Polymetallic sulfide exploration on the deep seafloor: the feasibility of the MINI‐MOSES experiment. Geophysics51, 1808–1818.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. YuanJ. and EdwardsN.2000. The assessment of marine gas hydrates through electrical remote sounding: hydrate without a BSR? Geophysical Research Letters27, 2397–2400.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12646
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12646
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D; Electromagnetics; Marine

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error