1887
Volume 67 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Quantifying the effects of pore‐filling materials on elastic properties of porous rocks is of considerable interest in geophysical practice. For rocks saturated with fluids, the Gassmann equation is proved effective in estimating the exact change in seismic velocity or rock moduli upon the changes in properties of pore infill. For solid substance or viscoelastic materials, however, the Gassmann theory is not applicable as the rigidity of the pore fill (either elastic or viscoelastic) prevents pressure communication in the pore space, which is a key assumption of the Gassmann equation. In this paper, we explored the elastic properties of a sandstone sample saturated with fluid and solid substance under different confining pressures. This sandstone sample is saturated with octadecane, which is a hydrocarbon with a melting point of 28°C, making it convenient to use in the lab in both solid and fluid forms. Ultrasonically measured velocities of the dry rock exhibit strong pressure dependency, which is largely reduced for the filling of solid octadecane. Predictions by the Gassmann theory for the elastic moduli of the sandstone saturated with liquid octadecane are consistent with ultrasonic measurements, but underestimate the elastic moduli of the sandstone saturated with solid octadecane. Our analysis shows that the difference between the elastic moduli of the dry and solid‐octadecane‐saturated sandstone is controlled by the squirt flow between stiff, compliant, and the so‐called intermediate pores (with an aspect ratio larger than that of compliant pore but much less than that of stiff pores). Therefore, we developed a triple porosity model to quantify the combined squirt flow effects of compliant and intermediate pores saturated with solid or viscoelastic infill. Full saturation of remaining stiff pores with solid or viscoelastic materials is then considered by the lower embedded bound theory. The proposed model gave a reasonable fit to the ultrasonic measurements of the elastic moduli of the sandstone saturated with liquid or solid octadecane. Comparison of the predictions by the new model to other solid substitution schemes implied that accounting for the combined effects of compliant and intermediate pores is necessary to explain the solid squirt effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12677
2018-08-23
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BerrymanJ.G.1980. Long‐wavelength propagation in composite elastic media II. Ellipsoidal inclusions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1820–1831.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChristensenR.2005. Mechanics of Composite Materials. NY: Dover Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CizR. and ShapiroS.A.2007. Generalization of Gassmann equations for porous media saturated with a solid material. Geophysics72, A75–A79.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CraneR.L. and KnoppJ.S.2009. Eshbach's Handbook of Engineering Fundamentals, 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. de PaulaO.B., PervukhinaM., MakarynskaD. and GurevichB.2012. Modeling squirt dispersion and attenuation in fluid‐saturated rocks using pressure dependency of dry ultrasonic velocities. Geophysics77, WA157–WA168.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Eberhart‐PhillipsD., HanD.‐H. and ZobackM.D.1989. Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity, and clay content in sandstone. Geophysics54, 82–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien: Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich96, 1–23.
  8. GlubokovskikhS., GurevichB. and SaxenaN.2016. A dual‐porosity scheme for fluid/solid substitution. Geophysical Prospecting64, 1112–1121.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GurevichB., MakarynskaD., de PaulaO.B. and PervukhinaM.2010. A simple model for squirt‐flow dispersion and attenuation in fluid‐saturated granular rocks. Geophysics75, N109–N120.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GurevichB., MakarynskaD. and PervukhinaM.2009. Ultrasonic moduli for fluid‐saturated rocks: Mavko‐Jizba relations rederived and generalized. Geophysics74, N25–N30.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GurevichB. and SaxenaN.2015. A simple recipe for solid substitution at low frequencies and application to heavy oil rocks. Paper presented at the 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2015.
  12. HashinZ. and ShtrikmanS.1963. A variational approach to the elastic behavior of multiphase materials. Journal Mechanics Physical Solids11, 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HudsonJ.A.1981. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal International64, 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KusterG.T. and ToksözM.N.1974. Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two‐phase media: Part I. Theoretical formulations. Geophysics39, 587–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LebedevM., PervukhinaM., MikhaltsevitchV., DanceT., BilenkoO. and GurevichB.2013. An experimental study of acoustic responses on the injection of supercritical CO2 into sandstones from the Otway Basin. Geophysics78, D293–D306.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LeurerK.C. and DvorkinJ.2006. Viscoelasticity of precompacted unconsolidated sand with viscous cement. Geophysics71, T31–T40.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MakarynskaD., GurevichB., BehuraJ. and BatzleM.2010. Fluid substitution in rocks saturated with viscoelastic fluids. Geophysics75, E115–E122.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MavkoG. and JizbaD.1991. Estimating grain‐scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics56, 1940–1949.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MavkoG. and SaxenaN.2013. Embedded‐bound method for estimating the change in bulk modulus under either fluid or solid substitution. Geophysics78, L87–L99.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PervukhinaM., GurevichB., DewhurstD.N. and SigginsA.F.2010. Applicability of velocity—stress relationships based on the dual porosity concept to isotropic porous rocks. Geophysical Journal International181, 1473–1479.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SaengerE.H., LebedevM., UribeD., OsornoM., VialleS., DudaM., IglauerS. and SteebH.2016. Analysis of high‐resolution X‐ray computed tomography images of Bentheim sandstone under elevated confining pressures. Geophysical Prospecting64, 848–859.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SaxenaN. and MavkoG.2014. Exact equations for fluid and solid substitution. Geophysics79, L21–L32.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SaxenaN. and MavkoG.2015. Effects of fluid‐shear resistance and squirt flow on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics80, D99–D110.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SayersC. and KachanovM.1991. A simple technique for finding effective elastic constants of cracked solids for arbitrary crack orientation statistics. International Journal of Solids and Structures27, 671–680.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SayersC. and KachanovM.1995. Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth100, 4149–4156.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SchoenbergM. and DoumaJ.1988. Elastic wave propagation in media with parallel fractures and aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting36, 571–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ShapiroS.A.2003. Elastic piezosensitivity of porous and fractured rocks. Geophysics68, 482–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. TsaiH.‐C. and LeeC.‐C.1998. Compressive stiffness of elastic layers bonded between rigid plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures35, 3053–3069.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. VernikL. and HammanJ.2009. Stress sensitivity of sandstones and 4D applications. The Leading Edge28, 90–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. XuS. and WhiteR.E.1995. A new velocity model for clay‐sand mixtures. Geophysical Prospecting43, 91–118.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12677
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12677
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Elastic; Fluid; Rock physics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error