1887
Volume 66, Issue 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

P‐wave and S‐wave velocities are vital parameters for the processing of seismic data and may be useful for geotechnical studies used in mine planning if such data were collected more often. Seismic velocity data from boreholes increase the robustness and accuracy of the images obtained by relatively costly seismic surface reflection surveys. However, sonic logs are rarely acquired in boreholes in‐and‐near base metal and precious metal mineral deposits until a seismic survey is planned, and only a few new holes are typically logged because the many hundreds of holes previously drilled are no longer accessible. If there are any pre‐existing petrophysical log data, then the data are likely to consist of density, magnetic susceptibility, resistivity and natural gamma logs. Thus, it would be of great benefit to be able to predict the velocities from other data that is more readily available.

In this work, we utilize fuzzy c‐means clustering to build a “fuzzy” relationship between sonic velocities and other petrophysical borehole data to predict P‐wave and S‐wave velocity. If boreholes with sonic data intersect most of the important geological units in the area of interest, then the cluster model developed may be applied to other boreholes that do not have sonic data, but do have other petrophysical data to be used for predicting the sonic logs. These predicted sonic logs may then be used to create a three‐dimensional volume of velocity with greater detail than would otherwise be created by the interpolation of measured sonic data from sparsely located holes.

Our methodology was tested on a dataset from the Kevitsa Ni‐Cu‐PGE deposit in northern Finland. The dataset includes five boreholes with wireline logs of P‐wave velocity, S‐wave velocity, density, natural gamma, magnetic susceptibility and resistivity that were used for cluster analysis. The best combination of input data for the training section was chosen by trial and error, but differences in the misfit between the various training datasets were not particularly significant. Our results show that the fuzzy c‐means method can predict sonic velocities from other borehole data very well, and the fuzzy c‐means method works better than using multiple linear‐regression fitting. The predicted P‐wave velocity data are of sufficient quality to robustly add low‐frequency information for seismic impedance inversion and should provide better velocity models for accurate depth conversion of seismic reflection data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12687
2018-09-30
2020-04-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agliardi, F., Sapigni, M. & Crosta, G.B.2016. Rock mass characterization by high‐resolution sonic and GSI borehole logging. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering49, 4303–4318.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmadi, M.A., Zendehboudi, S., Lohi, A., Elkamel, A. and Chatzis, I.2013. Reservoir permeability prediction by neural networks combined with hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Geophysical Prospecting61, 582–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aminzadeh, F.2004. Soft computing for qualitative and quantitative seismic object and reservoir property prediction. Part 3: Evolutionary computing and other aspects of soft. First break22, 107–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aminzadeh, F. and De Groot, P.2004. Soft computing for qualitative and quantitative seismic object and reservoir property prediction. Part 1: Neural network applications. First break22, 49–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Aminzadeh, F. and Wilkinson, D.2004. Soft computing for qualitative and quantitative seismic object and reservoir property prediction. Part 2: Fuzzy logic applications. First break22, 69–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Asoodeh, M. and Bagheripour, P.2012. Prediction of compressional, shear, and Stoneley wave velocities from conventional well log data using a committee Machine with intelligent systems. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering45, 45–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagheripour, P., Gholami, A., Asoodeh, M. and Vaezzadeh‐Asadi, M.2015. Support vector regression based determination of shear wave velocity. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering125, 95–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Behn, M.D. and Kelemen, P.B.2003. Relationship between seismic P‐wave velocity and the composition of anhydrous igneous and meta‐igneous rocks. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GC000393.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bezdek, J.C.1981. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brocher, T.M.2005. Empirical relations between elastic wavespeeds and density in the earth's crust. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95, 2081–2092.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cranganu, C. and Breaban, M.2013. Using support vector regression to estimate sonic log distributions: A case study from the Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering103, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Huenges, E.1997. Factors controlling the variances of seismic velocity, density, thermal conductivity and heat production of cores from the KTB Pilot Hole. Geophysical Research Letters24, 341–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jang, J.S.R.1993. ANFIS: adaptive‐network‐based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics23, 665–685.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jauch, F.2000. Using borehole geophysics for geotechnical classifications of crystalline rock masses in tunneling. Zurich: PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kieu, D.T. & Kepic, A.2018. Building 3D model of rock quality designation assisted by co‐operative inversion of seismic and borehole data. Australian Exploration Geoscience Conference, Sydney, Australia, Expanded Abstracts, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kieu, D.T., Kitzig, M.C. & Kepic, A.2016. Estimation of P‐wave velocity from other borehole data. Barcelona, Spain: First Conference on Geophysics for Mineral Exploration and Mining.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kieu, T.D. and Kepic, A.2015. Incorporating prior information into seismic impedance inversion using fuzzy clustering technique. SEG International Exposition and 85th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, Expanded Abstract, 3451–3455.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kisi, O. and Zounemat‐Kermani, M.2016. Suspended sediment modeling using neuro‐fuzzy embedded fuzzy c‐means clustering technique. Water Resources Management, 30, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Koivisto, E., Malehmir, A., Heikkinen, P., Heinonen, S. and Kukkonen, I.2012. 2D reflection seismic investigations at the Kevitsa Ni‐Cu‐PGE deposit, northern Finland. Geophysics77, WC149–WC162.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Koivisto, E., Malehmir, A., Hellqvist, N., Voipio, T. and Wijns, C.2015. Building a 3D model of lithological contacts and near‐mine structures in the Kevitsa mining and exploration site, Northern Finland: Constraints from 2D and 3D reflection seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting63, 754–773.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Malehmir, A., Juhlin, C., Wijns, C., Urosevic, M., Valasti, P. and Koivisto, E.2012. 3D reflection seismic imaging for open‐pit mine planning and deep exploration in the Kevitsa Ni‐Cu‐PGE deposit, northern Finland. Geophysics77, WC95–WC108.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Maleki, S., Moradzadeh, A., Riabi, R.G., Gholami, R. and Sadeghzadeh, F.2014. Prediction of shear wave velocity using empirical correlations and artificial intelligence methods. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics3, 70–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pedrycz, W. and Izakian, H.2014. Cluster‐centric fuzzy modeling. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22, 1585–1597.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rajabi, M., Bohloli, B. and Gholampour Ahangar, E.2010. Intelligent approaches for prediction of compressional, shear and Stoneley wave velocities from conventional well log data: A case study from the Sarvak carbonate reservoir in the Abadan Plain (Southwestern Iran). Computers & Geosciences36, 647–664.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rezaee, M.R., Kadkhodaie Ilkhchi, A. and Barabadi, A.2007. Prediction of shear wave velocity from petrophysical data utilizing intelligent systems: An example from a sandstone reservoir of Carnarvon Basin, Australia. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering55, 201–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Roubens, M.1982. Fuzzy clustering algorithms and their cluster validity. European Journal of Operational Research10, 294–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schmitt, D.R., Mwenifumbo, C.J., Pflug, K.A. and Meglis, I.L.2003. Geophysical logging for elastic properties in hard rock: A tutorial. Hardrock Seismic Exploration20–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Singh, R., Vishal, V. and Singh, T.N.2012. Soft computing method for assessment of compressional wave velocity. Scientia Iranica19, 1018–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Singh, T.N., Sinha, S. and Singh, V.K.2007. Prediction of thermal conductivity of rock through physico‐mechanical properties. Building and Environment42, 146–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Steel, M.A.2011. Petrophysical modelling using self‐organising maps. Australia: Master thesis, Curtin University.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mutanen, T.1997. Geology and ore petrology of the Aka Danger and Koitelainen mafic layered intrusions and the Keivitsa‐Sato vaara layered complex, northern Finland. Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin 395.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, Z.2001. Fundamentals of seismic rock physics. Geophysics66, 398–412.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Xie, X.L. and Beni, G.1991. A validity measure for fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence13, 841–847.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zadeh, L.A.1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control8, 338–353.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Zadeh, L.A.1994. Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing. Communications of the ACM37, 77–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ziramov, S., Dzunic, A. and Urosevic, M.2015. Kevitsa Ni‐Cu‐PGE deposit, North Finland ‐ A seismic case study. 24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, Expanded Abstract, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zoveidavianpoor, M.2014. A comparative study of artificial neural network and adaptive neurofuzzy inference system for prediction of compressional wave velocity. Neural Computing and Applications25, 1169–1176.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zoveidavianpoor, M., Samsuri, A. and Shadizadeh, S.R.2013. Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for compressional wave velocity prediction in a carbonate reservoir. Journal of Applied Geophysics89, 96–107.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12687
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12687
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Borehole geophysics , Logging , Parameter estimation and Seismic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error