1887
Volume 67 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews the impacts of new satellite altimeter data sets and new technology on the production of satellite gravity. It considers the contribution of the increased data volume, the application of new altimeter acquisition technology and the potential for future developments. Satellite altimeter derived gravity has provided gravity maps of the world's seas since the 1980s, but, from 1995 to 2010, virtually all improvements were in the processing as there were no new satellite data with closely spaced tracks. In recent years, new data from CryoSat‐2 (launched in 2010) and the geodetic mission of Jason‐1 (2012–2013) have provided a wealth of additional coverage and new technology allows further improvements. The synthetic aperture radar mode of CryoSat‐2 uses a scanning approach to limit the size of the altimeter sea surface footprint in the along‐track direction. Tests indicate that this allows reliable data to be acquired closer to coastlines. The synthetic aperture radar interferometric mode of CryoSat‐2 uses two altimeters to locate sea‐surface reflection points laterally away from the satellite track. In a study to generate gravity for freshwater lakes, this mode is found to be valuable in extending the available satellite coverage. The AltiKa altimeter uses higher frequency radar to provide less noisy sea‐surface signals and its new orbit mode gives potential for further improvements in satellite gravity. Future developments include the potential for swath mapping to provide further gravity improvements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12697
2018-10-22
2020-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AndersenO.B., KnudsenP. and BerryP.2010. The DNSC08GRA global marine gravity field from double retracked satellite altimetry. Journal of Geodesy84, 191–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AndersenO.B., KnudsenP., KenyonS., FactorJ.K. and HolmesS.2017. Global gravity field from recent satellites (DTU15) – Arctic improvements. First Break35, 37–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BiancamariaS., LettenmaierD.P. and PavelskyT.M.2016. The SWOT mission and its capabilities for land hydrology. Surveys in Geophysics37, 307–337.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BonnefondP., VerronJ., AublancJ., BabuK., Bergé‐NguyenM., CancetM.et al. 2018. The benefits of the Ka‐band as evidenced from the SARAL/AltiKa altimetric mission: quality assessment and unique characteristics of AltiKa data. Remote Sensing10, 83.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrownG.1977. The average impulse response of a rough surface and its applications. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering2, 67–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CheyneyS., FletcherK.M.U., GreenC.M. and CampbellS.J.2017. New global lake gravity from advances in satellite altimetry processing. SEG 87th Annual Meeting, Houston, TX, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 1844–1848.
  7. DawsonG.J., GreenC.M. and FletcherK.M.U.2015. Using the SAR mode from CryoSat‐2 to improve satellite derived gravity near the coast. 77th EAGE Meeting, Madrid, Spain, Expanded Abstracts, We N112 11.
  8. DengX., FeatherstoneW.E., HwangC. and BerryP.A.M.2002. Estimation of contamination of ERS‐2 and POSEIDON satellite radar altimetry close to the coasts of Australia. Marine Geodesy25, 249–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DrewesH., KuglitschF., AdámJ. and RózsaS.2016. The geodesist's handbook 2016. Journal of Geodesy90, 907–1205.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FairheadJ. and OdegardM.2002. Advances in gravity survey resolution. The Leading Edge21, 36–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FairheadJ.D., GreenC.M. and FletcherK.M.U.2004. Hydrocarbon screening of the deep continental margins using non‐seismic methods. First Break22, 59–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FörsteC., BruinsmaS., AbrikosovO., RudenkoS., LemoineJ.‐M., MartyJ.‐C.et al. 2016. EIGEN‐6S4 a Time‐Variable Satellite‐Only Gravity Field Model to d/o 300 Based on LAGEOS, GRACE and GOCE Data from the Collaboration of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse, V. 2.0. GFZ Data Services.
  13. GarciaE.S., SandwellD.T. and SmithW.H.F.2014. Retracking CryoSat‐2, Envisat and Jason‐1 radar altimetry waveforms for improved gravity field recovery. Geophysical Journal International196, 1402–1422.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Getech
    Getech . 2017. UKCS Multi‐Satellite Gravity Data. Oil and Gas Authority.
  15. HaxbyW.F.1985. Gravity Field of the World's Oceans. US Navy, Naval Office of Research.
  16. OlgiatiA., BalminoG., SarrailhM. and GreenC.M.1995. Gravity anomalies from satellite altimetry: comparison between computation via geoid heights and via deflections of the vertical. Bulletin géodésique69, 252–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PavlisN.K., HolmesS.A., KenyonS.C. and FactorJ.K.2012. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysical Research117, B04406.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RaneyR.K.2012. CryoSat SAR‐mode looks revisited. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters9, 393–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SandwellD., GarciaE., SoofiK., WesselP., ChandlerM. and SmithW.2013. Toward 1‐mGal accuracy in global marine gravity from CryoSat‐2, Envisat, and Jason‐1. The Leading Edge32, 892–899.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SandwellD.T. and McAdooD.C.1990. High‐accuracy, high‐resolution gravity profiles from 2 years of the GEOSAT exact repeat mission. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans95, 3049–3060.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SandwellD.T., MüllerR.D., SmithW.H.F., GarciaE. and FrancisR.2014. New global marine gravity model from CryoSat‐2 and Jason‐1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science346, 65–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SandwellD.T. and SmithW.H.F.1997. Marine gravity anomaly from GEOSAT and ERS 1 satellite altimetry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth102, 10039–10054.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WesselP. and WattsA.B.1988. On the accuracy of marine gravity measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth93, 393–413.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12697
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12697
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition , Gravity and Imaging
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error