1887
Volume 66, Issue 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The elastic properties of crystalline rocks can be estimated from ultrasonic measurements on the powders of crushed rocks produced by the drilling process. To determine the elastic properties of grains from properties of powder packs, we study the dependence of their ultrasonic wave velocities on pressure. From this dependency, using the Hertz–Mindlin theory, we can calculate the effective ratio of the grain shear modulus to one minus the Poisson ratio. The Hertz–Mindlin theory requires the knowledge of grain coordination number as a function of pressure, which can be obtained using an empirical relation based on published numerical simulations. Previous work has shown that this approach gives an accurate prediction of the effective bulk modulus of glass beads but produces a significant discrepancy for sand. This discrepancy may be attributed to the angularity of sand grains. To overcome this problem, we introduce a shape factor into the empirical relation for the coordination number. This new shape factor allows us to reconcile the rock physics model with laboratory measurements. We show that the shape factor varies from 1 to 2.5 for different grain shape angularity and sorting (grain size distributions). The modified theory allows us to estimate a combination of elasticity parameters of the grains from the measured dependence of P‐wave velocity in the pack on the pressure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12698
2018-10-10
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BachrachR. and AvsethP.2008. Rock physics modeling of unconsolidated sands: accounting for nonuniform contacts and heterogeneous stress fields in the effective media approximation with applications to hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics73, E197–E209.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BachrachR., DvorkinJ. and NurA.M.2000. Seismic velocities and Poisson's ratio of shallow unconsolidated sands. Geophysics65, 559–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BilenkoO., UvarovaY. and LebedevM.2015. Acoustic properties of rocks compacted from powders. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2015: 24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Perth, pp. 1–4.
  4. DomenicoS.1977. Elastic properties of unconsolidated porous sand reservoirs. Geophysics42, 1339–1368.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DuttaT., MavkoG. and MukerjiT.2010. Improved granular medium model for unconsolidated sands using coordination number, porosity, and pressure relations. Geophysics75, E91–E99.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GarciaX. and MedinaE.2006. Hysteresis effects studied by numerical simulations: cyclic loading‐unloading of a realistic sand model. Geophysics71, F13–F20.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. JohnsonK.1987. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LandauL.D. and LifshitzE.M.1970. Theory of elasticity, 2nd edn. Pegamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LebedevM., PervukhinaM., MikhaltsevitchV., DanceT., BilenkoO. and GurevichB.2013. An experimental study of acoustic responses on the injection of supercritical CO2 into sandstones from the Otway Basin. Geophysics78, D293–D306.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MakseH.A., GlandN., JohnsonD.L. and SchwartzL.2004. Granular packings: nonlinear elasticity, sound propagation, and collective relaxation dynamics. Physical Review E70, 061302.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PilbeamC.C. and VaišnysJ.R.1973. Acoustic velocities and energy losses in granular aggregates. Journal of Geophysical Research78, 810–824.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PrasadM. and MeissnerR.1992. Attenuation mechanisms in sands: laboratory versus theoretical (biot) data. Geophysics57, 710–719.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ShaebaniM.R., MadadiM., LudingS. and WolfD.E.2012. Influence of polydispersity on micromechanics of granular materials. Physical Review E85, 011301.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SzarfK., CombeG. and VillardP.2011. Polygons vs. clumps of discs: a numerical study of the influence of grain shape on the mechanical behaviour of granular materials. Powder Technology208, 279–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ZhangH. and MakseH.2005. Jamming transition in emulsions and granular materials. Physical Review E72, 011301.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ZimmerM.A., PrasadM., MavkoG. and NurA.2007. Seismic velocities of unconsolidated sands: part 1 pressure trends from 0.1 to 20 MPa. Geophysics72, E1–E13.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12698
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12698
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Mining , Rock physics and Ultrasonic velocities
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error