1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 67, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 67 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Synthetic rock samples can offer advantages over natural rock samples when used for laboratory rock physical properties studies, provided their success as natural analogues is well understood. The ability of synthetic rocks to mimic the natural stress dependency of elastic wave, electrical and fluid transport properties is of primary interest. Hence, we compare a consistent set of laboratory multi‐physics measurements obtained on four quartz sandstone samples (porosity range 20–25%) comprising two synthetic and two natural (Berea and Corvio) samples, the latter used extensively as standards in rock physics research. We measured simultaneously ultrasonic (P‐ and S‐wave) velocity and attenuation, electrical resistivity, permeability and axial and radial strains over a wide range of differential pressure (confining stress 15–50 MPa; pore pressure 5–10 MPa) on the four brine saturated samples. Despite some obvious physical discrepancies caused by the synthetic manufacturing process, such as silica cementation and anisotropy, the results show only small differences in stress dependency between the synthetic and natural sandstones for all measured parameters. Stress dependency analysis of the dry samples using an isotropic effective medium model of spheroidal pores and penny‐shaped cracks, together with a granular cohesion model, provide evidence of crack closure mechanisms in the natural sandstones, seen to a much lesser extent in the synthetic sandstones. The smaller grain size, greater cement content, and cementation under oedometric conditions particularly affect the fluid transport properties of the synthetic sandstones, resulting in lower permeability and higher electrical resistivity for a similar porosity. The effective stress coefficients, determined for each parameter, are in agreement with data reported in the literature. Our results for the particular synthetic materials that were tested suggest that synthetic sandstones can serve as good proxies for natural sandstones for studies of elastic and mechanical properties, but should be used with care for transport properties studies.

© 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2018 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12699
2018-10-15
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12699
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐WardyW. and ZimmermanR.W.2004. Effective stress law for the permeability of clay‐rich sandstones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth109, B04203.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AmalokwuK., BestA.I. and ChapmanM.2016. Effects of aligned fractures on the response of velocity and attenuation ratios to water saturation variation: a laboratory study using synthetic sandstones. Geophysical Prospecting64, 942–957.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AmalokwuK., BestA.I., SothcottJ., ChapmanM., MinshullT. and LiX.‐Y.2014. Water saturation effects on elastic wave attenuation in porous rocks with aligned fractures. Geophysical Journal International197, 943–947.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. AmalokwuK., ChapmanM., BestA.I., MinshullT.A. and LiX.‐Y.2015a. Water saturation effects on P‐wave anisotropy in synthetic sandstone with aligned fractures. Geophysical Journal International202, 1088–1095.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. AmalokwuK., ChapmanM., BestA.I., SothcottJ., MinshullT.A. and LiX.‐Y.2015b. Experimental observation of water saturation effects on shear wave splitting in synthetic rock with fractures aligned at oblique angles. Geophysical Journal International200, 17–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. AmalokwuK.J.2016. Saturation effects on frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy in fractured porous rocks. PhD thesis, University of Southampton.
  7. BernabéY., FryerD.T. and HayesJ.A.1992. The effect of cement on the strength of granular rocks. Geophysical Research Letters19, 1511–1514.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BerrymanJ.G.1992. Effective stress for transport properties of inhomogeneous porous rock. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth97, 17409–17424.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. BestA.I.1992. The prediction of the reservoir properties of sedimentary rocks from seismic measurements. PhD thesis, University of Reading.
  10. BoltonA.J., MaltmanA.J. and FisherQ.2000. Anisotropic permeability and bimodal pore‐size distributions of fine‐grained marine sediments. Marine and Petroleum Geology17, 657–672.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. BörnerJ.H., HerdegenV., RepkeJ.‐U. and SpitzerK.2013. The impact of CO2 on the electrical properties of water bearing porous media – laboratory experiments with respect to carbon capture and storage. Geophysical Prospecting61, 446–460.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. BrzesowskyR.H., SpiersC.J., PeachC.J. and HangxS.J.T.2014. Time‐independent compaction behavior of quartz sands. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth119, 936–956.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ChapmanM.2003. Frequency‐dependent anisotropy due to meso‐scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting51, 369–379.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ChilingarianG.V. and WolfK.H.1976. Compaction of Coarse‐Grained Sediments. Elsevier Scientific.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. ChristensenN.I. and WangH.F.1985. The influence of pore pressure and confining pressure on dynamic elastic properties of Berea sandstone. Geophysics50, 207–213.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. CrawfordB.R., FaulknerD.R. and RutterE.H.2008. Strength, porosity, and permeability development during hydrostatic and shear loading of synthetic quartz‐clay fault gouge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth113, B03207.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. CrawleyM.J.2007. The R Book. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. DautriatJ., GlandN., GuelardJ., DimanovA. and RaphanelJ.2009. Axial and radial permeability evolutions of compressed sandstones: end effects and shear‐band induced permeability anisotropy. Pure and Applied Geophysics166, 1037–1061.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. DavidC., MenéndezB. and Bernabé, Y.1998. The mechanical behaviour of synthetic sandstone with varying brittle cement content. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences35, 759–770.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Delle PianeC. and SaroutJ.2016. Effects of water and supercritical CO2 on the mechanical and elastic properties of Berea sandstone. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control55, 209–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. den BrokS.W.J., DavidC. and BernabéY.1997. Preparation of synthetic sandstones with variable cementation for studying the physical properties of granular rocks. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences ‐ Series IIA ‐ Earth and Planetary Science325, 487–492.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. DigbyP.J.1981. The effective elastic moduli of porous granular rocks. Journal of Applied Mechanics48, 803–808.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Falcon‐SuarezI., Canal‐VilaJ., Delgado‐MartinJ., NorthL. and BestA.2017a. Characterisation and multifaceted anisotropy assessment of Corvio sandstone for geological CO2 storage studies. Geophysical Prospecting65, 1293–1311.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Falcon‐SuarezI., Marín‐MorenoH., BrowningF., LichtschlagA., RobertK., NorthL.J. and BestA.I.2017b. Experimental assessment of pore fluid distribution and geomechanical changes in saline sandstone reservoirs during and after CO2 injection. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control63, 356–369.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Falcon‐SuarezI., NorthL., AmalokwuK. and BestA.2016. Integrated geophysical and hydromechanical assessment for CO2 storage: shallow low permeable reservoir sandstones. Geophysical Prospecting64, 828–847.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. FortinJ., GuéguenY. and SchubnelA.2007. Effects of pore collapse and grain crushing on ultrasonic velocities and Vp/Vs. Journal of Geophysical Research112, B08207.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. GlubokovskikhS. and GurevichB.2015. Effect of micro‐inhomogeneity on the effective stress coefficients and undrained bulk modulus of a poroelastic medium: a double spherical shell model. Geophysical Prospecting63, 656–668.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. GuéguenY. and SchubnelA.2003. Elastic wave velocities and permeability of cracked rocks. Tectonophysics370, 163–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. HangxS.J.T., SpiersC.J. and PeachC.J.2010. Creep of simulated reservoir sands and coupled chemical‐mechanical effects of CO2 injection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth115, B09205.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. HofmannR., XuX., BatzleM., PrasadM., FurreA.‐K. and PillitteriA.2005. Effective pressure or what is the effect of pressure? The Leading Edge24, 1256–1260.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. HoltR.M., BrignoliM. and KenterC.J.2000. Core quality: quantification of coring‐induced rock alteration. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences37, 889–907.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. HoltR.M., NesO.‐M. and FjaerE.2005. In‐situ stress dependence of wave velocities in reservoir and overburden rocks. The Leading Edge24, 1268–1274.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. HoltR.M. and StenebråtenJ.F.2013. Controlled laboratory experiments to assess the geomechanical influence of subsurface injection and depletion processes on 4D seismic responses. Geophysical Prospecting61, 476–488.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. KachanovM.1993. Elastic solids with many cracks and related problems. In: Advances in Applied Mechanics, Vol. 30 (eds J.W.Hutchinson and T.Y.Wu), pp. 259–445. Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. KarnerS.L., ChesterF.M., KronenbergA.K. and ChesterJ.S.2003. Subcritical compaction and yielding of granular quartz sand. Tectonophysics377, 357–381.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LiL. and FjærE.2012. Modeling of stress‐dependent static and dynamic moduli of weak sandstones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth117, B05206.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. MaX. and ZobackM.D.2017. Laboratory experiments simulating poroelastic stress changes associated with depletion and injection in low‐porosity sedimentary rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth122, 2478–2503.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. MadonnaC., AlmqvistB.S.G. and SaengerE.H.2012. Digital rock physics: numerical prediction of pressure‐dependent ultrasonic velocities using micro‐CT imaging. Geophysical Journal International189, 1475–1482.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. NorthL., BestA.I., SothcottJ. and MacGregorL.2013. Laboratory determination of the full electrical resistivity tensor of heterogeneous carbonate rocks at elevated pressures. Geophysical Prospecting61, 458–470.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. PrasadM. and ManghnaniM.H.1997. Effects of pore and differential pressure on compressional wave velocity and quality factor in Berea and Michigan sandstones. Geophysics62, 1163–1176.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. RathoreJ.S., FjaerE., HoltR.M. and RenlieL.1995. P‐ and S‐wave anisotropy of a synthetic sandstone with controlled crack geometryl1. Geophysical Prospecting43, 711–728.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. TeamR.D.C.2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. TerzaghiK., PeckR.B. and MesriG.1996. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 3rd edn. Wiley‐Interscience.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. TillotsonP., ChapmanM., BestA.I., SothcottJ., McCannC., ShangxuW. and LiX.‐Y.2011. Observations of fluid‐dependent shear‐wave splitting in synthetic porous rocks with aligned penny‐shaped fractures. Geophysical Prospecting59, 111–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. TillotsonP., ChapmanM., SothcottJ., BestA.I. and Li, X.‐Y.2014. Pore fluid viscosity effects on P‐ and S‐wave anisotropy in synthetic silica‐cemented sandstone with aligned fractures. Geophysical Prospecting62, 1238–1252.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. TillotsonP., SothcottJ., BestA.I., ChapmanM. and LiX.‐Y.2012. Experimental verification of the fracture density and shear‐wave splitting relationship using synthetic silica cemented sandstones with a controlled fracture geometry. Geophysical Prospecting60, 516–525.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. ToddT. and SimmonsG.1972. Effect of pore pressure on the velocity of compressional waves in low‐porosity rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research77, 3731–3743.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. VernikL. and HammanJ.2009. Stress sensitivity of sandstones and 4D applications. The Leading Edge28, 90–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. WangX.Q., SchubnelA., FortinJ., DavidE.C., GuéguenY. and GeH.K.2012. High Vp/Vs ratio: saturated cracks or anisotropy effects? Geophysical Research Letters39, L11307.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. WangZ.2002. Seismic anisotropy in sedimentary rocks, part 1: a single‐plug laboratory method. Geophysics67, 1415–1422.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. WangZ., GeliusL.‐J. and KongF.‐N.2009. Simultaneous core sample measurements of elastic properties and resistivity at reservoir conditions employing a modified triaxial cell – a feasibility study. Geophysical Prospecting57, 1009–1026.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. WongT.‐F., DavidC. and Menendez, B.2004. Mechanical compaction (chapter 2). In: Mechanics of Fluid Saturated Rocks (ed. Y.G.A.M.Boutéca), pp. 55–114. Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. XuX., HofmannR., BatzleM. and TsheringT.2006. Influence of pore pressure on velocity in low‐porosity sandstone: implications for time‐lapse feasibility and pore‐pressure study. Geophysical Prospecting54, 565–573.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12699
Loading
Comparison of stress‐dependent geophysical, hydraulic and mechanical properties of synthetic and natural sandstones for reservoir characterization and monitoring studies
Geophysical Prospecting 67, 784 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12699
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12699
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12699
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Elastics; Resistivity; Rock physics; Wave

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error