1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 67, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 67 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The prediction of effective elastic properties of a granular medium using ultrasonic data based on contact models has been studied widely in both laboratory experiments and numerical simulations. In contrast, a calculation of the elastic properties of the constituent grains using similar data by inverting the equations from those models is a rather new concept. To do so, we have developed a controlled experiment technique that includes a uniaxial compaction test and measures ultrasonic velocities of four unconsolidated quartz sand samples with different sorting and grain shapes. We observe that both P‐ and S‐wave velocities are significantly influenced by the microstructure or internal arrangement of the grains. Well sorted and more spherical and rounded samples show higher velocities than the poorly sorted and less spherical and rounded samples. A microstructural parameter – namely coordination number – we have calculated from high resolution micro computed tomography images provides a good match between the model and dynamic effective bulk moduli of the sand pack. Combining this coordination number with a frictional parameter calculated from the measured velocity ratios has been very effective to fit the model with the dynamic effective shear moduli. Using these two key parameters along with the experiment results in the contact model we have been able to obtain the elastic parameters of the quartz sand grains in the sample. Elastic parameters obtained thus are very close to the actual values of the quartz grains found in the literature. This technique can be useful in hard rock mineral exploration where missing core samples or an absence of well logs can be replaced by laboratory measurements of powders to find the elasticity or velocities of the rocks. Moreover, the elastic properties of the solid phase calculated using this technique can be used as input parameters for the fluid substitution and rock physics characterization of unconsolidated reservoir sands.

© 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12743
2019-02-28
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12743
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AhmedZ. and LebedevM.2018. Elastic properties of sands, Part 1: Micro computed tomography image analysis of grain shapes and their relationship with microstructure. Geophysical Prospecting.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AhmedZ., LebedevM., MadadiM. and UvarovaY.2016. Inverting dynamic elastic moduli of a granular pack to get shear modulus of the grain. ASEG‐PESA‐AIG 2016, 25th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, 944–948.
  3. BachrachR. and AvsethP.2008. Rock physics modeling of unconsolidated sands: accounting for nonuniform contacts and heterogeneous stress fields in the effective media approximation with applications to hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics73, E197–E209.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BhuiyanM.H. and HoltR.M.2016. Variation of shear and compressional wave modulus upon saturation for pure pre‐compacted sands. Geophysical Journal International206, 487–500.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BrandtH.1955. A study of the speed of sound in porous granular media. Journal of Applied Mechanics22, 479–486.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. DigbyP.1981. The effective elastic moduli of porous granular rocks. Journal of Applied Mechanics48, 803–808.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. DomenicoS.N.1977. Elastic properties of unconsolidated porous sand reservoirs. Geophysics42, 1339–1368.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. DuffautK. and LandrøM.2007. Vp/Vs ratio versus differential stress and rock consolidation – a comparison between rock models and time‐lapse AVO data. Geophysics72, C81–C94.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. DuffautK., LandrøM. and SollieR.2010. Using Mindlin theory to model friction‐dependent shear modulus in granular media. Geophysics75, E143–E152.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. DuttaT., MavkoG. and MukerjiT.2010. Improved granular medium model for unconsolidated sands using coordination number, porosity, and pressure relations. Geophysics75, E91–E99.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GallopJ.2013. Extended Walton third‐order elastic coefficients modified by an anisotropic and stress‐dependent coordination number. Geophysics78, D545–D556.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. GoddardJ.D.1990. Nonlinear elasticity and pressure‐dependent wave speeds in granular media. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences430, 105–131.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. HertzH.1882. On the contact of rigid elastic solids and on hardness. Macmillan paper 6.
  14. HowellD., BehringerR.P. and VejeC.1999. Stress fluctuations in a 2D granular Couette experiment: a continuous transition. Physical Review Letters82, 5241–5244.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HuangY. and DanielsK.E.2016. Friction and pressure‐dependence of force chain communities in granular materials. Granular Matter, 18: 85. pp. 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. JenkinsJ., JohnsonD., La RagioneL. and MakseH.2005. Fluctuations and the effective moduli of an isotropic, random aggregate of identical, frictionless spheres. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of the Solids53, 197–225.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. JohnsonD., SchwartzL., ElataD., BerrymanJ., HornbyB. and NorrisA.1998. Linear and nonlinear elasticity of granular media: stress‐induced anisotropy of a random sphere pack. Journal of Applied Mechanics65, 380–388.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. LiuC.‐h., NagelS.R., SchecterD.A., CoppersmithS.N., MajumdarS., NarayanO.et al. 1995. Force fluctuations in bead packs. Science269, 513–515.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. MadadiM., BonaA., LebedevM. and GurevichB.2015. Estimation of grain elasticity properties from ultrasonic measurements on dry granular pack. 3rd International Workshop on Rock Physics, Perth.
  20. MakseH.A., GlandN., JohnsonD.L. and SchwartzL.2004. Granular packings – nonlinear elasticity, sound propagation and collective relaxation dynamics. Physical Review E70, 061302.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. MakseH.A., GlandN., JohnsonD.L. and SchwartzL.M.1999. Why effective medium theory fails in granular materials. Physical Review Letters83, 5070–5073.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinD.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook, Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. MindlinR.D.1949. Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. Journal of Applied Mechanics16, 259–268.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. MurphyW.1982. Effects of microstructure and pore fluids on the acoustic properties of granular sedimentary materials. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
  25. NorrisA. and JohnsonD.1997. Nonlinear elasticity of granular media. Journal of Applied Mechanics64, 39–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. NurA., MavkoG., DvorkinJ. and GalmudiD.1998. Critical porosity – a key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks. The Leading Edge17, 357–362.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. OwensE.T. and DanielsK.E.2011. Sound propagation and force chains in granular materials. EPL (Europhysics Letters)94, 54005.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. SainR.2010. Numerical simulation of pore‐scale heterogeneity and its effects on elastic, electrical and transport properties. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
  29. SaulM., LumleyD. and ShraggeJ.2013. Modeling the pressure sensitivity of uncemented sediments using a modified grain contact theory: incorporating grain relaxation and porosity effects. Geophysics78, D327–D338.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. SavaD. and HardageB.2006. Rock physics characterization of hydrate‐bearing deepwater sediments. SEG/New Orleans 2006 annual meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1913–1917.
  31. WaltonK.1987. The effective elastic moduli of a random packing of spheres. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids35, 213–226.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. WinklerK.1983. Contact stiffness in granular porous materials: comparison between theory and experiment. Geophysical Research Letters10, 1073–1076.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. YinH.1992. Acoustic velocity and attenuation of rocks, Isotropy, intrinsic anisotropy, and stress‐induced anisotropy. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
  34. ZadehM.K., MondolN.H. and JahrenJ.2016. Experimental mechanical compaction of sands and sand‐clay mixtures: a study to investigate evolution of rock properties with full control on mineralogy and rock texture. Geophysical Prospecting64, 915–941.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. ZimmerM., PrasadM., MavkoG. and NurA.2007. Seismic velocities of unconsolidated sands: Part 1 – pressure trends from 0.1 to 20 MPa. Geophysics72, E1–E13.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. ZimmerM.A.2003. Seismic velocities in unconsolidated sands: measurements of pressure, sorting, and compaction effects. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12743
Loading
Elastic properties of sands, Part 2: Implementation of contact‐based model to determine the elasticity of the grains from ultrasonic measurements
Geophysical Prospecting 67, 745 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12743
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12743
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12743
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Coordination number; Effective elastic property; Effective medium theory; Ultrasonic measurement; Unconsolidated sand

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error