1887
Volume 67 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

From August 2016 to July 2017, a passive seismic survey was conducted in South Western Iran as a part of a pilot project aimed to improve the imaging in geologically complex areas. Passive seismic methods have shown to be a useful tool to infer the physical properties of the underground geological structures where traditional hydrocarbon exploration methods are challenging. For this purpose, a dense passive seismic network consisting of 119 three‐component borehole seismic stations was deployed over an area of 400 km2 around the city of Dehdasht. This paper focuses on the details of the network design, which was devoted to high‐resolution seismological applications, including local earthquake tomography and seismic attenuation imaging. In this regard, we describe the instrument types and the station installation procedures used to obtain high‐quality data that were used to retrieve three‐dimensional models of ‐ and ‐wave velocity and ‐wave attenuation in the area using tomographic inversion techniques. We also assess the network performance in terms of the seismic ambient noise levels recorded at each station site, and we revise the horizontal orientation of the sensors using surface waves from teleseismic earthquakes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12746
2019-03-01
2020-04-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AgafonovV., NeeshpapaA.V. and ShabalinaA.S.2015. Electrochemical seismometers of linear and angular motion. In: Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering (eds M.Beer, I.Kougioumtzoglou, E.Patelli, and I.KAu). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Diez ZaldívarE.R., PrioloE., GrigoliF. and CescaS.2016. Misalignment angle correction of borehole seismic sensors: the case study of the Collalto seismic network. Seismological Research Letters87, 668–677.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DoranA. and LaskeG.2017. Ocean‐Bottom Seismometer Instrument Orientations via Automated Rayleigh‐Wave Arrival‐Angle Measurements. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America107, 691–708.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EkströmG. and BusbyR.W.2008. Measurements of seismometer orientation at US array transportable array and backbone stations. Seismological Research Letters79, 554–561.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HavskovJ. and AlguacilG.2004. Instrumentation in earthquake seismology. In: Modern Approaches in Geophysics, Vol. 22. Springer, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HiramatsuY., YamanakaH., TadokoroK., NishigamiK. and OhmiS.2002. Scaling law between corner frequency and seismic moment of microearthquakes: is the breakdown of cube law a nature of earthquake? Geophys Res Lett29, 1211.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KapotasS., TselentisG.‐A. and MartakisN.2003. Case study in NW Greece of passive seismic tomography: a new tool for hydrocarbon exploration. First Break21, 37–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LimH., KimY., SongT.A. and ShenX.2018. Measurement of seismometer orientation using the tangential P‐wave receiver function based on harmonic decomposition. Geophysical Journal International212, 1747–1765.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MartakisN., KapotasS. and TselentisG.‐A.2006. Integrated passive seismic acquisition and methodology. Case studies. Geophysical Prospecting54, 829–847.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McNamaraD.E. and BulandR.2004. Ambient noise levels in the continental United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94, 1517–1527.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. McNamaraD.E. and BoazR.I.2011. PQLX: a seismic data quality control system description, applications, and users manual. U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report 2010‐1292.
  12. McNamaraD.E., HuttC.R., GeeL.S., BenzH.M. and BulandR.P.2009. A method to establish seismic noise baselines for automated station assessment. Seismological Research Letters80, 628–637.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. NissenE., TatarM., JacksonJ.A. and AllenM.B.2011. New views on earthquake faulting in the Zagros fold‐and‐thrust belt of Iran. Geophysical Journal International186, 928–944.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PetersonJ.1993. Observation and modeling of seismic background noise. U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report 1993‐322.
  15. Schulte‐PelkumV., MastersG. and ShearerP.2001. Upper mantle anisotropy from long‐period P polarization. Journal of Geophysical Research106, 21917–21934.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SherkatiS., MolinaroM., Frizon de LamotteD. and LetouzeyJ.2005. Detachment folding in the central and eastern Zagros fold‐belt (Iran): salt mobility, multiple detachments and late basement control. Journal of Structural Geology27, 1680–1696.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. StachnikJ.C., SheehanA.F., ZietlowD.W., YangZ., CollinsJ. and FerrisA.2012. Determination of New Zealand ocean bottom seismometer orientation via Rayleigh‐wave polarization. Seismological Research Letters83, 704–712.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. VecseyL., PlomerováV., JedličkaP., MunzarováH., BabuškaV. and the AlpArray working group2017. Data quality control and tools in passive seismi experiments exemplified on the Czech broadband seismic pool MOBNET in the AlpArray collaborative Project. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems6, 505–521.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. WesselP., SmithW.H.F., ScharrooR., LuisJ.F. and WobbeF.2013. Generic mapping tools: improved version released. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union94, 409–410.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wilde‐PiórkoM., GrycukM., PolkowskiM. and GradM.2017. On the rotation of teleseismic seismograms based on the receiver function technique. Journal of Seismology21(4), 857–868.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ZhaY., WebbS.C. and MenkeW.2013. Determining the orientations of ocean bottom seismometers using ambient noise correlation. Geophysical Research Letters40, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12746
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12746
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition , Data processing , Monitoring and Passive method
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error