1887
Volume 67, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Seismic inversion is an important tool that transfers interface information of seismic data to formation information, which renders the seismic data easily understood by geologists or petroleum engineers. In this study, a novel multi‐trace basis‐pursuit inversion method based on the Bayesian theory is proposed to enhance the vertical resolution and overcome the lateral instability of inversion results between different traces occasionally seen in the traditional trace‐by‐trace basis‐pursuit inversion method. The Markov process is initially introduced to describe the relationship between adjacent seismic traces and their correlation, which we then close couple in the equation of our new inversion method. A recursive function is further derived to simplify the inversion process by considering the particularity of the coefficient matrix in the multi‐trace inversion equation. A series of numerical‐analysis and field data examples demonstrates that both the traditional and the new methods for P‐wave impedance inversion are helpful in enhancing the resolution of thin beds that are usually difficult to discern from original seismic profiles, thus highlighting the importance of acoustic‐impedance inversion for thin bed interpretation. Furthermore, in addition to yielding thin bed inversion results with enhanced lateral continuity and high vertical resolution, our proposed method is robust to noise and cannot be easily contaminated by it, which we verify using both synthetic and field data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12752
2019-03-01
2020-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AukenE., AndersV.C., JacobsenB.H., FogedN. and SørensenK.I.2005. Piecewise 1D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data. Geophysical Prospecting, 53, 497–506.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BulandA. and HenningO.2003. Joint AVO inversion, wavelet estimation and noise‐level estimation using a spatially coupled hierarchical Bayesian model. Geophysical Prospecting, 51, 531–550.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DuijndamA.J.W.1988a. Bayesian estimation in seismic inversion part I: principles. Geophysical Prospecting, 36, 878–898.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DuijndamA.J.W.1988b. Bayesian estimation in seismic inversion part II: uncertainty analysis. Geophysical Prospecting, 36, 899–918.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gholami, A. and SacchiM.D.2013. Fast 3D blind seismic deconvolution via constrained total variation and GCV. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 6, 2350–2369.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HamidH. and PidliseckyA.2015. Multitrace impedance inversion with lateral constraints. Geophysics, 80, M101–M111.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HammerH., KolbjørnsenO., TjelmelandH. and BulandA.2012. Lithology and fluid prediction from prestack seismic data using a Bayesian model with Markov process prior. Geophysical Prospecting, 60, 500–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HeimerA. and CohenI.2009. Multichannel seismic deconvolution using Markov‐Bernoulli random‐field modeling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47, 2047–2058.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HuangH.D., ZhaoD., RenD.Z. and WangY.M.2011. A thin bed inversion method based on theory. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 919–924.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. IdierJ. and GoussardY.1993. Multichannel seismic deconvolution. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 31, 961–979.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JensasI.O.2008. A blockyness constraint for seismic AVA inversion . Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  12. KarsliH., GuneyR. and SenkayaM.2017. Post‐stack high‐resolution deconvolution using Cauchy norm regularization with FX filter weighting. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10:551, 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KolbjørnsenO., BulandA., HaugeR., RøeP., JullumM., MetcalfeR.W., et al. 2016. Bayesian AVO inversion to rock properties using a local neighborhood in a spatial prior model. The Leading Edge, 35, 431–436.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MaM., WangS.X., YuanS.Y., WangJ.J. and WenJ.X.2017. Multichannel spatially correlated reflectivity inversion using block sparse Bayesian learning. Geophysics, 82, V191–V199.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. PurnomoE.W. and GhoshD.P.2013. Constraining stochastic inversion with frequency domain seismic signature for seismically thin‐bed interpretation. 2013 International Conferences on Geological, Geographical, Aerospace and Earth Sciences. Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 19, conference 1.
  16. RabbenT.E., TjelmelandH. and UrsinB.2008. Nor‐linear Bayesian joint inversion of seismic reflection coefficients. Geophysical Journal International, 173, 265–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RueH. and HeldL.2005. Gaussian Markov Random Fields, Theory and Applications, 1 ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  18. UlvmoenM. and HammerM.2010. Bayesian lithology/fluid inversion‐comparison of two algorithms. Computational Geosciences, 14, 357–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. WangY.H.2010. Multichannel matching pursuit for seismic trace decomposition. Geophysics, 75, V61–V66.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. YinX.Y. and ZhangS.X.2014. Bayesian inversion for effective pore‐fluid bulk modulus based on fluid‐matrix decoupled amplitude variation with offset approximation. Geophysics, 79, R221–R232.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. YinX.Y., ZongZ.Y. and WuG. C.2015. Research on seismic fluid identification driven by rock physics. Science China: Earth Sciences, 58, 159–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. YuanS.Y. and WangS.X.2013. Spectral spare Bayesian learning reflectivity inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 735–746.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhangR., SenM. and SrinivasanS.2013. Multi‐trace basis pursuit inversion with spatial regularization. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10, 035012.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ZongZ.Y. and YinX.Y.2017. Model parameterization and p‐wave AVA direct inversion for Young's impedance. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174, 1965–1981.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12752
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12752
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error