1887
Volume 67, Issue 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Angle‐domain common‐image gathers are an important tool in the post‐processing of seismic images and for reservoir characterization. The generation of angle gathers is a very important issue when dealing with angle‐domain images. Efficiency and robustness are the main concerns in the generation of angle gathers. In this paper, we propose two methods for producing angle gathers based on the implementation of a reverse‐time migration. In the hybrid method, we adopt the local‐plane‐wave decomposition method to extract the local plane waves and obtain two possible opposite propagation directions in the time‐wavenumber domain. Then, Poynting vectors are used to determine the correct propagation direction. The hybrid method achieves a satisfactory balance between robustness and computational efficiency. Furthermore, in the improved hybrid method, additional computational acceleration is obtained by separating the overlapping and non‐overlapping wavefield areas. The hybrid method is only applied in these areas with overlapping wave fronts, and the Poynting‐vector‐based method is adopted in the other areas. The location of the overlapping events is determined using the eigenvalues of the structural tensor. Finally, the two‐dimensional synthetic and field examples demonstrate the effectiveness of both methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12785
2019-08-16
2020-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BiondiB. and SymesW.W.2004. Angle‐domain common‐image gathers for migration velocity analysis by wavefield‐continuation imaging. Geophysics69, 1283–1298.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BroxT., WeickertJ., BurgethB. and MrazekP.2006. Nonlinear structure tensors. Image and Vision Computing24, 41–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DickensA. and WinbowG.A.2011. RTM angle gathers using Poynting vectors. 81st SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3109–3113.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DuveneckE.2013. A pragmatic approach for computing full‐volume RTM reflection angle/azimuth gathers. 75th EAGE annual international conference and exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, Tu‐11‐01.
  5. FehmersG.C. and HöckerC.F.W.2003. Fast structural interpretation with structure‐oriented filtering. Geophysics68, 1286–1293.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FomelS.2004. Theory of 3‐D angle gathers in wave‐equation imaging. 74th SEG annual international meeting. Expanded Abstracts, 1053–1056.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GuanH., WilliamsonP., DenelB., AudebertF. and DuquetB.2013. Angle‐domain common‐image gathers extracted from pre‐stack RTM images. 83th SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3767–3772.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HuJ., WangH. and WangX.2016. Angle gathers from reverse time migration using analytic wavefield propagation and decomposition in the time domain. Geophysics81, S1–S9.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. JinH., McMechanG.A. and GuanH.2014. Comparison of methods for extracting ADCIGs from RTM. Geophysics79, S89–S103.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. JinH. and McMechanG.A.2015. Removing smearing‐effect artifacts in angle‐domain common‐image gathers from reverse time migration. Geophysics80, U13–U24.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JinH., McMechanG.A. and NguyenB.2015. Improving input/output performance in 2D and 3D angle‐domain common‐image gathers from reverse time migration. Geophysics80, S65–S77.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LiuZ. and BleisteinN.1995. Migration velocity analysis: theory and an iterative algorithm. Geophysics60, 142–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PatrikeevaN. and SavaP.2013. Comparison of angle decomposition methods for wave equation migration. 83th SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3773–3778.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SavaP. and FomelS.2003. Angle‐domain common‐image gathers by wavefield continuation methods. Geophysics68, 1065–1074.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SavaP. and FomelS.2006. Time‐shift imaging condition in seismic migration. Geophysics71, S209–S217.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. TangB., XuS. and ZhangY.2013. 3D angle gathers with plane‐wave reverse‐time migration. Geophysics78, S117–S123.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Van VlietL.J. and VerbeekP.W.1995. Estimators for orientation and anisotropy in digitized images. ASCI95, 16–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. VyasM., DuX., MobleyE. and FletcherR.2011a. Methods for computing angle gathers using RTM. 73rd EAGE Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, F020.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. VyasM., NicholsD. and MobleyE.2011b. Efficient RTM angle gathers using source directions. 81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3104–3108.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WeickertJ.1998. Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing. Teubner, Stuttgart.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WhitmoreN.D. and CrawleyS.2012. Applications of RTM inverse scattering imaging conditions. 82th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. WhitmoreN.D., CrawleyS., ZhuC. and SosaA.2014. Dynamic angle and azimuth decomposition of RTM image. 84th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3801–3805.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. XieX. and WuR.S.2002. Extracting angle domain information from migrated wavefields. 72nd SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1360–1363.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. XuS., ZhangY., PhamD. and LambareG.2005. Antileakage Fourier transform for seismic data regularization. Geophysics70, V87–V95.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. XuS., ZhangY. and TangB.2011. 3D angle gathers from reverse time migration. Geophysics76, S77–S92.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. YanJ. and DickensT.A.2016. Reverse time migration angle gathers using Poynting vectors. Geophysics81, S511–S522.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. YanR. and XieX.B.2012a. An angle‐domain imaging condition for elastic reverse time migration and its application to angle gather extraction. Geophysics77, S105–S115.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. YanR. and XieX.B.2012b. AVA analysis based on RTM angle‐domain common image gather. 82th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. YanR. and XieX.B.2011. Angle gather extraction for acoustic and isotropic elastic RTM. 81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3141–3146.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. YoonK.2017. Reverse time migration angle gathers using Poynting vector and pseudospectral method. 87th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 4630–4634.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. YoonK., GuoM., CaiJ. and WangB.2011. 3D RTM angle gathers from source wave propagation direction and dip of reflector. 81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3136–3140.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. YoonK. and MarfurtK.J.2006. Reverse‐time migration using the Poynting vector. Exploration Geophysics37, 102–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. YoonK., MarfurtK.J. and StarrE.W.2004. Challenges in reverse‐time migration. 74th SEG Annual International meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1057–1060.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. ZhangQ.2014. RTM angle gathers and specular filter (SF) RTM using optical flow. 84th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3816–3820.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ZhangQ. and McMechanG.A.2011a. Common‐image gathers in the incident phase‐angle domain from reverse time migration in 2D elastic VTI media. Geophysics76, S197–S206.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ZhangQ. and McMechanG.A.2011b. Direct vector‐field method to obtain angle‐domain common‐image gathers from isotropic acoustic and elastic reverse‐time migration. Geophysics76, WB135–WB149.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. ZhaoL., FengB. and WangH.2012. Efficient RTM angle gathers using source propagation direction and reflector normal direction. 82nd SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12785
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12785
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error