1887
Volume 67 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Two methods for low‐altitude calibration of a single‐rotor unmanned aircraft system using a real‐time compensator are tested: (1) a stationary calibration where the unmanned aircraft system executes manoeuvres while hovering in order to minimize ambient field changes due to the local geology; and (2) an adapted box calibration flown in four orthogonal directions. Both methods use two compensator‐specific limits derived from established methods for manned airborne calibration: the lowest frequency used by the compensator for the calibration algorithm and the maximum variation of the ambient magnetic intensity experienced by the unmanned aircraft system during calibration. Prior to flying, the unmanned aircraft system was magnetically characterized using the heading error and fourth difference. Magnetic interference was mitigated by extending the magnetometer‐unmanned aircraft system separation distance to 1.7 m, shielding, and demagnetization. The stationary calibration yielded an improvement ratio of 8.595 and a standard deviation of the compensated total magnetic intensity of 0.075 nT (estimated Figure‐of‐Merit of 3.8 nT). The box calibration also yielded an improvement ratio of 3.989 and a standard deviation of the compensated total magnetic intensity of 0.083 nT (estimated Figure‐of‐Merit of 4.2 nT). The stationary and box calibration solutions were robust with low cross‐correlation indexes (1.090 and 1.048, respectively) when applied to a non‐native data set.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12800
2019-05-09
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, D.E. and Pita, A.C.2005. Geophysical surveying with GeoRanger TM UAV. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 67–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Caron, R.M., Samson, C., Straznicky, P., Ferguson, S. and Sander, L.2014. Aeromagnetic surveying using a simulated unmanned aircraft system. Geophysical Prospecting62, 352–363.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Coyle, M., Dumont, R., Keating, P., Kiss, F. and Miles, W.2014. Geological Survey of Canada Aeromagnetic Surveys: Design, Quality Assurance, and Data Dissemination. Ottawa, ON: Natural Resources Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cunningham, M., Samson, C., Wood, A. and Cook, I.2018. Aeromagnetic surveying with a rotary‐wing unmanned aircraft system: a case study from a zinc deposit in Nash Creek, New Brunswick, Canada. Pure and Applied Geophysics175, 3145–3158.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunningham, M., Samson, C., Wood, A., Cook, I. and Doyle, B.2016. An experimental aeromagnetic survey with a rotary‐wing unmanned aircraft system. The Leading Edge35, 270–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dou, Z., Han, Q., Niu, X., Peng, X. and Guo, H.2016a. An Adaptive Filter for Aeromagnetic Compensation Based on Wavelet Multiresolution Analysis. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters13, 1069–1073.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dou, Z., Han, Q., Niu, X., Peng, X. and Guo, H.2016b. An aeromagnetic compensation coefficient‐estimating method robust to geomagnetic gradient. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters13, 611–615.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eck, C. and Imbach, B.2012. Aerial magnetic sensing with an UAV helicopter. ISPRS ‐ International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information SciencesXXXVIII‐1/C22, 81–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Forrester, R., Huq, M.S., Ahmadi, M. and Straznicky, P.2014. Magnetic signature attenuation of an unmanned aircraft system for aeromagnetic survey. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics19, 1436–1446.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Forrester, R.W.2011. Magnetic signature control strategies for an unmanned aircraft system. MASc thesis, Carleton University, Canada.
  11. Funaki, M. and Hirasawa, N.2008. Outline of a small unmanned aerial vehicle (ant‐plane) designed for Antarctic research. Polar Science2, 129–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hardwick, C.D.1984. Important design considerations airborne magnetic gradiometers for inboard. Geophysics49, 2004–2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hashimoto, T., Koyama, T., Kaneko, T., Ohminato, T., Yanagisawa, T., Yoshimoto, M., et al. 2014. Aeromagnetic survey using an unmanned autonomous helicopter helicopter over Tarumae Volcano, northern Japan. Exploration Geophysics45, 37–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jia, J., Lo, B. and Groom, R.2004. Improved aeromagnetic compensation, Ontario Mineral Exploration Technology Program, Project # P02‐03‐043.
  15. Jianjun, Z., Chunsheng, L. and Hao, C.2014. A method for aircraft magnetic interference compensation based on small signal model and LMS algorithm. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics27, 1578–1585.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaneko, T., Koyama, T., Yasuda, A., Takeo, M., Yanagisawa, T., Kajiwara, K., et al. 2011. Low‐altitude remote sensing of volcanoes using an unmanned autonomous helicopter: an example of aeromagnetic observation at Izu‐Oshima volcano, Japan. International Journal of Remote Sensing32, 1491–1504.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koyama, T., Kaneko, T., Ohminato, T., Yanagisawa, T., Watanabe, A. and Takeo, M.2013. An aeromagnetic survey of Shinmoe‐dake volcano, Kirishima, Japan, after the 2011 eruption using an unmanned autonomous helicopter. Earth, Planets and Space65, 657–666.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Leach, B.W.1979. Automatic aeromagnetic compensation. Laboratory Technical Report LTR‐FR‐69. National Research Council Canada.
  19. Leliak, P.1961. Identification and evaluation of magnetic‐ field sources of magnetic airborne detector equipped aircraft. IRE Transactions on Aerospace and Navigational Electronics8, 95–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Macharet, D., Perez‐Imaz, H., Rezeck, P., Potje, G., Benyosef, L., Wiermann, A., et al. 2016. Autonomous aeromagnetic surveys using a fluxgate magnetometer. Sensors16, 2169.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Malehmir, A., Dynesius, L., Paulusson, K., Paulusson, A., Johansson, H., Bastani, M., et al. 2017. The potential of rotary‐wing UAV‐based magnetic surveys for mineral exploration: a case study from central Sweden. The Leading Edge36, 552–557.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McAnuff, C., Samson, C., Melanson, D., Polowick, C. and Bethell, E.2019. Structural mapping of rock walls imaged with a LiDAR mounted on an unmanned aircraft system. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems7, 21–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Noriega, G.2011. Performance measures in aeromagnetic compensation. The Leading Edge30, 1122–1127.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Noriega, G.2013. Model stability and robustness in aeromagnetic compensation. First Break31, 73–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ontario Geological Survey
    Ontario Geological Survey2015. Geophysical data set 1079 Ontario airborne geophysical surveys ‐ Ontario airborne geophysical surveys magnetic and electromagnetic data Kabinakagami Lake Area.
  26. Ontario Geological Survey
    Ontario Geological Survey2018. Geophysical data set 1037—revised, Ontario airborne geophysical surveys, magnetic data, grid data (ASCII and geosoft formats), Magnetic Supergrids.
  27. Parshin, A. V., Morozov, V.A., Blinov, A. V., Kosterev, A.N. and Budyak, A.E.2018. Low‐altitude geophysical magnetic prospecting based on multirotor UAV as a promising replacement for traditional ground survey. Geo‐Spatial Information Science21, 67–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Parvar, K.2016. Development and evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) magnetometry systems. MSc thesis, Queen's University, Canada.
  29. Parvar, K., Braun, A., Layton‐Matthews, D. and Burns, M.2018. UAV magnetometry for chromite exploration in the Samail ophiolite sequence, Oman. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems6, 57–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Samson, C., Straznicky, P., Laliberté, J., Caron, R., Ferguson, S. and Archer, R.2010. Designing and building an unmanned aircraft system for aeromagnetic surveying. SEG Denver 2010 Annual meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1167–1171.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Smellie, D.W.1967. Elementary approximations in aeromagnetic interpretation. Mining Geophysics2, 474–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Teskey, D.1991. Guide to Aeromagnetic Specifications and Contracts. Ottawa, ON: Geological Survey of Canada,.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Thébault, E., Finlay, C.C., Beggan, C.D., Alken, P., Aubert, J., Barrois, O., et al. 2015. International geomagnetic reference field: the 12th generation international geomagnetic reference field ‐ the twelfth generation. Earth, Planets and Space67, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tuck, L., Samson, C., Laliberté, J., Wells, M. and Bélanger, F.2018. Magnetic interference testing method for an electric fixed‐wing unmanned aircraft system (UAS). Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems6, 177–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Versteeg, R., Anderson, M., Beard, L., Corban, E., Curley, D., Gamey, J., et al. 2010. Development of autonomous rotorcraft for wide area assessment. EXT‐10‐18291. Idaho Falls, ID: Idaho National Laboratory
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Welch, P.1967. The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics15, 70–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wells, M.2008. Attenuating magnetic interference in a UAV system. MASc thesis, Carleton University, Canada.
  38. Wood, A., Cook, I., Doyle, B., Cunningham, M. and Samson, C.2016. Experimental aeromagnetic survey using an unmanned air system. The Leading Edge35, 270–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, B., Guo, Z. and Qiao, Y.2011. A simplified aeromagnetic compensation model for low magnetism UAV platform. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 3401–3404.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12800
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12800
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition , Magnetics and Noise
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error