1887
Volume 67, Issue 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We present an original implementation of the free‐surface boundary condition in a mesh‐free finite‐difference method for simulating elastic wave propagation in the frequency domain. For elastic wave modelling in the frequency domain, the treatment of free surfaces is a key issue which requires special consideration. In the present study, the free‐surface boundary condition is directly implemented at node positions located on the free‐surface. Flexible nature of the mesh‐free method for nodal distribution enables us to introduce topography into numerical models in an efficient manner. We investigate the accuracy of the proposed implementation by comparing numerical results with an analytical solution. The results show that the proposed method can calculate surface wave propagation even for an inclined free surface with substantial accuracy. Next, we calculate surface wave propagation in a model with a topographic surface using our method, and compare the numerical result with that using the finite‐element method. The comparison shows the excellent agreement with each other. Finally, we apply our method to the SEG foothill model to investigate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Since the mesh‐free method has high flexibility of nodal distribution, the proposed implementation would deal with models of topographic surface with sufficient accuracy and efficiency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12825
2019-07-17
2020-06-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BerengerJ.P.1994. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. Journal of Computational Physics114, 185–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BohlenT. and SaengerE.H.2006. Accuracy of heterogeneous staggered‐grid finite‐difference modeling of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics71, T109–T115.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CaoJ., ChenJ.B. and DaiM.X.2016. Improved free‐surface expression for frequency‐domain elastic optimal mixed‐grid modeling. Journal of Applied Geophysics130, 71–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CaoJ., ChenJ.B. and DaiM.X.2018. An adaptive free‐surface expression for three‐dimensional finite‐difference frequency‐domain modeling of elastic wave. Geophysical Prospecting66, 707–725.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GrayS.H. and MarfurtK.J.1995. Migration from topography: improving the near‐surface image. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics31, 18–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HuW.2016. An improved immersed boundary finite‐difference method for seismic wave propagation modeling with arbitrary surface topography. Geophysics81, T311–T322.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KomatitschD. and TrompJ.1999. Introduction to the spectral element method for three‐dimensional seismic wave propagation. Geophysical Journal International139, 806–822.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LiB., LiuY., SenM.K. and RenZ.2017. Time‐space‐domain mesh‐free finite difference based on least squares for 2D acoustic‐wave modeling. Geophysics82, T143–T157.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LombardB., PirauxJ., GelisC. and VirieuxJ.2008. Free and smooth boundaries in 2‐D finite‐difference schemes for transient elastic waves. Geophysical Journal International172, 252–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MarfurtK.J.1984. Accuracy of finite‐difference and finite‐element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave equations. Geophysics49, 533–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MartinB., FornbergB. and St‐CyrA.2015. Seismic modeling with radial‐basis‐function‐generated finite differences. Geophysics80, T137–T146.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MulderW.A.2017. A simple finite‐difference scheme for handling topography with the second‐order wave equation. Geophysics82, T111–T120.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PirauxJ. and LombardB.2001. A new interface method for hyperbolic problems with discontinuous coefficients: one‐dimensional acoustic example. Journal of Computational Physics168, 227–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. RobertssonJ.O.A.1996. A numerical free‐surface condition for elastic/viscoelastic finite‐difference modeling in the presence of topography. Geophysics61, 1921–1934.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. TakekawaJ., MadariagaR., MikadaH. and GotoT.2012. Numerical simulation of seismic wave propagation produced by earthquake by using a particle method. Geophysical Journal International191, 1305–1316.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. TakekawaJ. and MikadaH.2018. A mesh‐free finite‐difference method for elastic wave propagation in the frequency‐domain. Computers and Geosciences118, 65–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. TakekawaJ., MikadaH. and GotoT.2014a. A Hamiltonian particle method with a staggered particle technique for simulating seismic wave propagation. Pure and Applied Geophysics171, 1747–1757.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. TakekawaJ., MikadaH. and GotoT.2014b. An accuracy analysis of a Hamiltonian particle method with the staggered particles for seismic‐wave modeling including surface topography. Geophysics79, T189–T197.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. TakekawaJ., MikadaH. and ImamuraN.2015. A mesh‐free method with arbitrary‐order accuracy for acoustic wave propagation. Computers and Geosciences78, 15–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TarrassI., GiraudL. and ThoreP.2011. New curvilinear scheme for elastic wave propagation in presence of curved topography. Geophysical Prospecting59, 889–903.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WenterodtC. and EstorffO.V.2011. Optimized meshfree methods for acoustics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering200, 2223–2236.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ZengC., XiaJ., MillerR.D. and TsofliasG.P.2012. An improved vacuum formulation for 2D finite‐difference modeling of Rayleigh waves including surface topography and internal discontinuities. Geophysics77, T1–T9.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12825
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12825
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Computing aspects , Numerical study , Seismics and Wave
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error