1887
Volume 68 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The development of cost‐effective and environmentally acceptable geophysical methods for the exploration of mineral resources is a challenging task. Seismic methods have the potential to delineate the mineral deposits at greater depths with sufficiently high resolution. In hardrock environments, which typically host the majority of metallic mineral deposits, seismic depth‐imaging workflows are challenged by steeply dipping structures, strong heterogeneity and the related wavefield scattering in the overburden as well as the often limited signal‐to‐noise ratio of the acquired data. In this study, we have developed a workflow for imaging a major iron‐oxide deposit at its accurate position in depth domain while simultaneously characterizing the near‐surface glacial overburden including surrounding structures like crossing faults at high resolution. Our workflow has successfully been showcased on a 2D surface seismic legacy data set from the Ludvika mining area in central Sweden acquired in 2016. We applied focusing prestack depth‐imaging techniques to obtain a clear and well‐resolved image of the mineralization down to over 1000 m depth. In order to account for the shallow low‐velocity layer within the depth‐imaging algorithm, we carefully derived a migration velocity model through an integrative approach. This comprised the incorporation of the tomographic near‐surface model, the extension of the velocities down to the main reflectors based on borehole information and conventional semblance analysis. In the final step, the evaluation and update of the velocities by investigation of common image gathers for the main target reflectors were used. Although for our data set the reflections from the mineralization show a strong coherency and continuity in the seismic section, reflective structures in a hardrock environment are typically less continuous. In order to image the internal structure of the mineralization and decipher the surrounding structures, we applied the concept of reflection image spectroscopy to the data, which allows the imaging of wavelength‐specific characteristics within the reflective body. As a result, conjugate crossing faults around the mineralization can directly be imaged in a low‐frequency band while the internal structure was obtained within the high‐frequency bands.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12836
2019-07-26
2020-09-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/68/1/gpr12836.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12836&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AllenR.L., LundstromI., RipaM. and ChristoffersonH.1996. Facies analysis of a 1.9 Ga, continental margin, back‐arc, felsic caldera province with diverse Zn‐Pb‐Ag‐(Cu‐Au) sulfide and Fe oxide deposits, Bergslagen region, Sweden. Economic Geology91, 979–1008.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AlmqvistB., BjorkA., MattssonH., HedlundD., GunnarssonK., MalehmirA., et al. 2019. Magnetic characterization of magnetite and hematite from the Blötberget apatite‐iron‐oxide deposits (Bergslagen), central Sweden. Canadian Journal of Earth SciencesV. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2018-0183
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BalestriniF., DraganovD., MalehmirA., MarsdenP. and GhoseR.2020. Improved target illumination at Ludvika mines of Sweden through seismic‐interferometric surface‐wave suppression. Geophysical Prospecting68, 200–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BuskeS., GutjahrS. and SickC.2009. Fresnel volume migration of single‐component seismic data. Geophysics74, WCA47‐WCA55.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. EatonD.W., MilkereitB. and SalisburyM.H.2003. Hardrock Seismic Exploration. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  6. GardnerL.1939. An areal plan of mapping subsurface structure by refraction shooting. Geophysics4, 247–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HloušekF., HellwigO. and BuskeS.2015. Improved structural characterization of the Earth's crust at the German Continental Deep Drilling Site using advanced seismic imaging techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth120, 6943–6959.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. JonssonE., TrollV.R., HögdahlK., HarrisC., WeisF., NilssonK P., et al. 2013. Magmatic origin of giant ‘Kiruna‐type’ apatite‐iron‐oxide ores in central Sweden. Scientific Reports3, 1644.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LüthS., BuskeS., GieseR. and GoertzA.2005. Fresnel volume migration of multicomponent data. Geophysics70, S121–S129.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MalehmirA., DahlinP., LundbergE., JuhlinC., SjöströmH. and HögdahlK.2011. Reflection seismic investigations in the Dannemora area, central Sweden: Insights into the geometry of polyphase deformation zones and magnetite‐skarn deposits. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth116.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MalehmirA., DurrheimR., BellefleurG., UrosevicM., JuhlinC., WhiteD.J., et al. 2012. Seismic methods in mineral exploration and mine planning: A general overview of past and present case histories and a look into the future. Geophysics77, WC173–WC190.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MalehmirA., DynesiusL., PaulussonK., PaulussonA., JohanssonH., BastaniM., et al. 2017a. The potential of rotary‐wing UAV‐based magnetic surveys for mineral exploration: a case study from central Sweden. The Leading Edge36, 552–557.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MalehmirA., MariesG., BäckströmE., SchönM. and MarsdenP.2017b. Developing cost‐effective seismic mineral exploration methods using a landstreamer and a drophammer. Scientific Reports7, 10325.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MalehmirA., HolmesP., GisseløP., SoccoL., CarvalhoJ., MarsdenP., et al. 2019. Smart exploration: innovative ways of exploring for critical raw materials of the EU. EAGE Annual Meeting, London, UK, June 2019.
  15. MariesG., MalehmirA., BäckströmE., SchönM. and MarsdenP.2017. Downhole physical property logging for iron‐oxide exploration, rock quality, and mining: An example from central Sweden. Ore Geology Reviews90, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MarkovicM., MariesG., MalehmirA., BäckströmE., SchönM., JakobssonJ., et al. 2018. Deep targeting iron‐oxide mineralization using reflection seismic method: a case study from the Ludvika mines of Sweden, 2nd Conference on Geophysics for Mineral Exploration and Mining, Porto, Expanded Abstracts.
  17. MarkovicM., MariesG., MalehmirA., von KetelholdtJ., BäckströmE., SchönM., et al. 2020. Deep reflection seismic imaging of iron‐oxide deposits in the Ludvika mining area of central Sweden. Geophysical Prospecting68, 7–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. NeidellN.S. and TanerM.T.1971. Semblance and other coherency measured for multichannel data. Geophysics36, 482–497.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PalmerD.1980. The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802426
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PapadopoulouM., Da ColF., MiB., BäckströmE.M., MarsdenP., MalehmirA. and SoccoL.V.2020. Surface‐wave analysis for static corrections in mineral exploration: a case study from central Sweden. Geophysical Prospecting68, 214–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PlaceJ., MalehmirA., HögdahlK., JuhlinC. and NilssonK.P.2015. Seismic characterization of the Grängesberg iron deposit and its mining‐induced structures, central Sweden. Interpretation3, SY41–SY56.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. PodvinP. and LecomteI.1991. Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools. Geophysical Journal International105, 271–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SchneiderW.A.1978. Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions. Geophysics43, 49–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SimonH., BuskeS., KraußF., GieseR., HedinP. and JuhlinC.2017. The derivation of an anisotropic velocity model from a combined surface and borehole seismic survey in crystalline environment at the COSC‐1 borehole, central Sweden. Geophysical Journal International210, 1332–1346.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. WidessM.B.1973. How thin is a thin bed?Geophysics38, 1176–1180.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. YilmazÖ.2001. Seismic data analysis. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801580
    [Google Scholar]
  27. YoonM., BuskeS., ShapiroS.A. and WiggerP.2009. Reflection Image Spectroscopy across the Andean subduction zone. Tectonophysics1, 51–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ZhangJ. and ToksözM.N.1998. Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography. Geophysics63, 1726–1737.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ZhangJ., YilmazÖ. and DaiN.2006. First‐arrival tomostatics and residual statics for near‐surface corrections. In CSPG CSEG SWLS Convention 2006. Calgary, AB (Canada).
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12836
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12836
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Data processing , Imaging , Seismics and Tomography
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error