Seismic wavefield modelling in two‐phase media including undulating topography with the modified Biot/squirt model by a curvilinear‐grid finite difference method

References

1. BiotM.A.1956a. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid, I: low frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 168–178.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BiotM.A.1956b. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid, II: higher frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 179–191.
   [Google Scholar]
3. DialloM.S. and Appel, E.2000. Acoustic wave propagation in saturated porous media: reformulation of the Biot /squirt flow theory. Journal of Applied Geophysics44, 313–325.
   [Google Scholar]
4. DialloM.S., PrasadM. and AppelE.2003. Comparison between experimental results and theoretical predictions of P wave velocity and attenuation at ultrasonic frequency. Wave Motion37, 1–16.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dvorkin, J. and Nur, A.1993. Dynamic poroelasticity: a unified model with the squirt and the Biot mechanisms. Geophysics58, 524–533.
   [Google Scholar]
6. FornbergB.1988. The pseudospectral method: accurate representation of interfaces in elastic wave calculations. Geophysics53, 625–637.
   [Google Scholar]
7. GistG.A.1994. Interpreting laboratory velocity measurements in partially gas‐saturated rocks. Geophysics59, 1100–1109.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GurevichB. and LopatnikovS.L.1995. Velocity and attenuation of elastic waves in finely layered porous rocks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society121, 933–947.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HayashiK., BumsD. and ToksözM.2001. Discontinuous‐grid finite‐difference seismic modeling including surface topography. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America91, 1750–1764.
   [Google Scholar]
10. HestholmS. and RuudB.2000. 2D finite‐difference viscoelastic wave modeling including surface topography. Geophysical Prospecting48, 341–373.
    [Google Scholar]
11. HestholmS. and RuudB.2010. 3D finite‐difference elastic wave modeling including surface topography. Geophysical Prospecting42, 371–390.
    [Google Scholar]
12. HixonR.1997. Evaluation of a high‐accuracy MacCormack‐type scheme using benchmark problems. Journal of Computational Acoustics6, 291–305.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HixonR. and TurkelE.2000. Compact implicit MacCormack‐type schemes with high accuracy. Journal of Computational Physics158, 51–70.
    [Google Scholar]
14. JonesT.D.1986. Pore fluids and frequency‐dependent wave propagation in rocks. Geophysics56, 1939–1953.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KusterG.T. and ToksözM.N.1974. Velocity and attenuation of seismic wave in two‐phase media, part 1: theoretical formulation. Geophysics39, 587–606.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LanH.T., LiuC. and GuoZ.Q.2014. Modelling of seismic wave propagation in two‐phase medium based on reformulated BISQ model using time‐splitting staggered pseudospectral method. Global Geology33, 190–199 (in Chinese).
    [Google Scholar]
17. LiN.2012. Finite difference seismoelectric wave modeling in 2D porous media with surface topography. PhD thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei Shi, Anhui Sheng, China.
18. LiY.2014. Wavefield simulation of two‐phase medium by finite difference method. Master thesis, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Shi, Sichuan Sheng, China.
19. MavkoG.M. and JizbaD.1991. Estimating grain‐scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics56, 1940–1949.
    [Google Scholar]
20. NguyenV.P., RabczukT., BordasS. and DuflotM.2008. Meshless methods: A review and computer implementation aspects. Mathematics & Computers in Simulation79, 763–813.
    [Google Scholar]
21. ParraJ.O.1997. The transversely isotropic poroelastic wave equation including the Biot and the squirt mechanisms: theory and application. Geophysics62, 309–318.
    [Google Scholar]
22. SunY., ZhangW. and ChenX.2016. Seismic‐wave modelling in the presence of surface topography in 2D general anisotropic media by a curvilinear grid finite‐difference method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America106, 1036–1054.
    [Google Scholar]
23. TamC.K. and WebbJ.C.1993. Dispersion‐relation‐preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics107, 262–281.
    [Google Scholar]
24. TarrassI., GiraudL. and ThoreP.2011. New curvilinear scheme for elastic wave propagation in presence of curved topography. Geophysical Prospecting59, 889–906.
    [Google Scholar]
25. TessmerE., KosloffD. and BehleA.1992. Elastic wave propagation simulation in the presence of surface topography. Geophysical Journal International108, 621–632.
    [Google Scholar]
26. ThompsonJ.F., WarsiZ.U.A. and MastinC.W.1985. Numerical Grid Generation—Foundations and Applications, North Holland, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
27. WinklerK.1985. Dispersion analysis of velocity and attenuation in Berea sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research90, 6793–6800.
    [Google Scholar]
28. ZhangW. and ChenX.2006. Traction image method for irregular free surface boundaries in finite difference seismic wave simulation. Geophysical Journal International167, 337–353.
    [Google Scholar]
29. ZhangW., ZhangZ. and ChenX.2012. Three‐dimensional elastic wave numerical modelling in the presence of surface topography by a collocated‐grid finite‐difference method on curvilinear grids. Geophysical Journal International190, 358–378.
    [Google Scholar]
30. ZhouZ.S. and HongW.2012. Boundary treatment for numerical simulation of seismic waves based on reformulated BISQ model. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals22, 976–984 (in Chinese).
    [Google Scholar]