oa Effects of pore fluids on quasi‐static shear modulus caused by pore‐scale interfacial phenomena

References

1. AdamL., BatzleM. and Brevik, I.2006. Gassmann's fluid substitution and shear modulus variability in carbonates at laboratory seismic and ultrasonic frequencies. Geophysics71, F173–F183.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AdamL., BatzleM., LewallenK.T. and van WijkK.2009. Seismic wave attenuation in carbonates. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth114.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AdamL. and OtheimT.2013. Elastic laboratory measurements and modeling of saturated basalts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth118, 840–851.
   [Google Scholar]
4. AndersM.H., LaubachS.E. and ScholzC.H.2014. Microfractures: a review. Journal of Structural Geology69, 377–394.
   [Google Scholar]
5. AslanS., Fathi NajafabadiN. and FiroozabadiA.2016. Non‐monotonicity of the contact angle from NaCl and MgCl2 concentrations in two petroleum fluids on atomistically smooth surfaces. Energy & Fuels30, 2858–2864.
   [Google Scholar]
6. AssefaS., McCannC. and SothcottJ.2003. Velocities of compressional and shear waves in limestones. Geophysical Prospecting51, 1–13.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BaechleG.T., EberliG.P., WegerR.J. and MassaferroJ.L.2009. Changes in dynamic shear moduli of carbonate rocks with fluid substitution. Geophysics74, E135–E147.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BaechleG.T., WegerR.J., EberliG.P., MassaferroJ.L. and SunY.F.2005. Changes of shear moduli in carbonate rocks: implications for Gassmann applicability. The Leading Edge24, 507–510.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BarenblattG.I., EntovV.M. and RyzhikV.M.1990. Theory of Fluid Flows Through Natural Rocks. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
10. BaudP., ZhuW. and WongT.F.2000. Failure mode and weakening effect of water on sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth105, 16371–16389.
    [Google Scholar]
11. BauerA., BhuiyanM.H., FjærE., HoltR.M., LozovyiS., PohlM.et al. 2016. Frequency‐dependent wave velocities in sediments and sedimentary rocks: laboratory measurements and evidences. The Leading Edge35, 490–494.
    [Google Scholar]
12. BemerE., HamonY. and AdelinetM.2019. Consistent experimental investigation of the applicability of Biot‐Gassmann's equation in carbonates. Geophysics84, 1–92.
    [Google Scholar]
13. BergsakerA.S., RøyneA., Ougier‐SimoninA., AubryJ. and RenardF.2016. The effect of fluid composition, salinity, and acidity on subcritical crack growth in calcite crystals. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth121, 1631–1651.
    [Google Scholar]
14. BerrymanJ.G.2005. Pore fluid effects on shear modulus in a model of heterogeneous rocks, reservoirs, and granular media. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth110.
    [Google Scholar]
15. BhuiyanM.H. and HoltR.M.2016. Variation of shear and compressional wave modulus upon saturation for pure pre‐compacted sands. Geophysical Journal International206, 487–500.
    [Google Scholar]
16. BormashenkoE.Y.2013a. Wetting of Real Surfaces, Vol. 19. Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
17. BormashenkoE.2013b. Wetting of real solid surfaces: new glance on well‐known problems. Colloid and Polymer Science291, 339–342.
    [Google Scholar]
18. BrooksR.H. and CoreyA.T.1966. Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division92, 61–90.
    [Google Scholar]
19. ChenH., AmirfazliA. and TangT.2013. Modeling liquid bridge between surfaces with contact angle hysteresis. Langmuir29, 3310–3319.
    [Google Scholar]
20. ChengC.H. and ToksözM.N.1979. Inversion of seismic velocities for the pore aspect ratio spectrum of a rock. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth84, 7533–7543.
    [Google Scholar]
21. ChibowskiE.2008. Surface free energy of sulfur—Revisited I. Yellow and orange samples solidified against glass surface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science319, 505–513.
    [Google Scholar]
22. ChristoffersenK.R. and WhitsonC.H.1995. Gas/oil capillary pressure of chalk at elevated pressures. SPE Formation Evaluation10, 153–159.
    [Google Scholar]
23. DavidC., DautriatJ., SaroutJ., Delle PianeC., MenéndezB., MacaultR.et al. 2015. Mechanical instability induced by water weakening in laboratory fluid injection tests. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth120, 4171–4188.
    [Google Scholar]
24. De GennesP.G., Brochard‐WyartF. and QuéréD.2013. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves. Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
25. De SouzaE.J., GaoL., McCarthyT.J., ArztE. and CrosbyA.J.2008. Effect of contact angle hysteresis on the measurement of capillary forces. Langmuir24, 1391–1396.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Diethart‐JaukE. and GegenhuberN.2018. Shear weakening for different lithologies observed at different saturation stages. Journal of Applied Geophysics148, 107–114.
    [Google Scholar]
27. EthingtonE.F.1990. Interfacial contact angle measurements of water, mercury, and 20 organic liquids on quartz, calcite, biotite, and Ca‐montmorillonite substrates (Report No. 90–409). US Geological Survey.
28. FabriciusI.L.2007. Chalk: composition, diagenesis and physical properties. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark55, 97–128.
    [Google Scholar]
29. FabriciusI.L., BächleG.T. and EberliG.P.2010. Elastic moduli of dry and water‐saturated carbonates—Effect of depositional texture, porosity, and permeability. Geophysics75, N65–N78.
    [Google Scholar]
30. FjærE., HoltR.M., RaaenA.M., RisnesR. and HorsrudP.2008. Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics, Vol. 53. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
31. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrs‐schrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
32. GegenhuberN.2015. Application of Gassmann's equation for laboratory data from carbonates from Austria. Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences108, 239–244.
    [Google Scholar]
33. GerkeH.H. and GenuchtenM.V.1993. A dual‐porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resources Research29, 305–319.
    [Google Scholar]
34. HedegaardK. and Graue, A.2011. Does wettability affect the strength of chalk? 45th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, June, San Francisco, California. American Rock Mechanics Association.
35. HookerJ.N., GaleJ.F.W., GomezL.A., LaubachS.E., MarrettR. and ReedR.M.2009. Aperture‐size scaling variations in a low‐strain opening‐mode fracture set, Cozzette Sandstone, Colorado. Journal of Structural Geology31, 707–718.
    [Google Scholar]
36. JapsenP., HøierC., RasmussenK.B., FabriciusI., MavkoG. and PedersenJ.M.2002. Effect of fluid substitution on ultrasonic velocities in chalk plugs, South Arne field, North Sea. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1881–1884.
    [Google Scholar]
37. KhazanehdariJ. and SothcottJ.2003. Variation in dynamic elastic shear modulus of sandstone upon fluid saturation and substitution. Geophysics68, 472–481.
    [Google Scholar]
38. LaliberteG.E., CoreyA.T. and BrooksR.H.2007. Properties of unsaturated porous media. Hydrology papers No. 17. Colorado State University.
39. LebedevM, WilsonM.E. and MikhaltsevitchV.2014. An experimental study of solid matrix weakening in water‐saturated Savonnières limestone. Geophysical Prospecting62, 1253–1265.
    [Google Scholar]
40. LiD., WeiJ., DiB., DingP., HuangS. and ShuaiD.2018. Experimental study and theoretical interpretation of saturation effect on ultrasonic velocity in tight sandstones under different pressure conditions. Geophysical Journal International212, 2226–2237.
    [Google Scholar]
41. LiD., WeiJ., DiB., DingP. and ShuaiD.2017. The effect of fluid saturation on the dynamic shear modulus of tight sandstones. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering14, 1072.
    [Google Scholar]
42. MavkoG. and JizbaD.1991. Estimating grain‐scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics56, 1940–1949.
    [Google Scholar]
43. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2014. Effective medium models. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. https://pangea.stanford.edu/courses/gp262/Notes/9.EffectiveMediumTheories.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
45. MikhaltsevitchV., LebedevM. and GurevichB.2016. Laboratory measurements of the effect of fluid saturation on elastic properties of carbonates at seismic frequencies. Geophysical Prospecting64, 799–809.
    [Google Scholar]
46. MurphyW.F.1984. Acoustic measures of partial gas saturation in tight sandstones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth89, 11549–11559.
    [Google Scholar]
47. MurphyW.F.III, WinklerK.W. and KleinbergR.L.1986. Acoustic relaxation in sedimentary rocks: dependence on grain contacts and fluid saturation. Geophysics51, 757–766.
    [Google Scholar]
48. MüllerT.M., GurevichB., and LebedevM.2010. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave‐induced flow in porous rocks—A review. Geophysics75, 75A147–75A164.
    [Google Scholar]
49. OkayamaT., KellerD.S. and LunerP.1997. The wetting of calcite surfaces. The Journal of Adhesion63, 231–252.
    [Google Scholar]
50. PapamichosE., BrignoliM. and SantarelliF.J.1997. An experimental and theoretical study of a partially saturated collapsible rock. Mechanics of Cohesive‐frictional Materials: An International Journal on Experiments, Modelling and Computation of Materials and Structures2, 251–278.
    [Google Scholar]
51. PatersonM.S. and WongT.F.2005. Experimental Rock Deformation‐the Brittle Field. Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
52. PetersenP.B. and SaykallyR.J.2006. On the nature of ions at the liquid water surface. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry57, 333–364.
    [Google Scholar]
53. PruessK. and TsangY.W.1990. On two‐phase relative permeability and capillary pressure of rough‐walled rock fractures. Water Resources Research26, 1915–1926.
    [Google Scholar]
54. PrideS.R. and BerrymanJ.G.2003. Linear dynamics of double‐porosity dual‐permeability materials. I. Governing equations and acoustic attenuation. Physical Review E68, 036603.
    [Google Scholar]
55. PrideS.R., BerrymanJ.G. and HarrisJ.M.2004. Seismic attenuation due to wave‐induced flow. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth109.
    [Google Scholar]
56. RenW. and WeinanE.2007. Boundary conditions for the moving contact line problem. Physics of Fluids19, 022101.
    [Google Scholar]
57. RegnetJ.B., RobionP., DavidC., FortinJ., BrigaudB. and YvenB.2015. Acoustic and reservoir properties of microporous carbonate rocks: Implication of micrite particle size and morphology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth120, 790–811.
    [Google Scholar]
58. RhettD.W. and LordC.J. (2001). Water weakening in sedimentary rocks. DC Rocks 2001, the 38th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association.
59. RostomF., RøyneA., DystheD.K. and RenardF.2013. Effect of fluid salinity on subcritical crack propagation in calcite. Tectonophysics583, 68–75.
    [Google Scholar]
60. RozhkoA.Y.2016. Two‐phase fluid‐flow modeling in a dilatant crack‐like pathway. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering146, 1158–1172.
    [Google Scholar]
61. RozhkoA.Y.2019. Bulk moduli and seismic attenuation in partially saturated rocks: hysteresis of liquid bridges effect. Geophysical Prospecting67, 1404–1430.
    [Google Scholar]
62. RozhkoA.Y. and BauerA.2018. Contact line friction and surface tension effects on seismic attenuation and effective bulk moduli in rock with a partially‐saturated crack. Geophysical Prospecting67, 913–934.
    [Google Scholar]
63. RisnesR. and FlaagengO.1999. Mechanical properties of chalk with emphasis on chalk‐fluid interactions and micromechanical aspects. Oil & Gas Science and Technology54, 751–758.
    [Google Scholar]
64. RisnesR., HaghighiH., KorsnesR.I. and NatvikO.2003. Chalk–fluid interactions with glycol and brines. Tectonophysics370, 213–226.
    [Google Scholar]
65. RisnesR., MadlandM.V., HoleM. and KwabiahN.K.2005. Water weakening of chalk—Mechanical effects of water–glycol mixtures. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering48, 21–36.
    [Google Scholar]
66. RøgenB., FabriciusI.L., JapsenP., HøierC., MavkoG. and PedersenJ.M.2005. Ultrasonic velocities of North Sea chalk samples: influence of porosity, fluid content and texture. Geophysical Prospecting53, 481–496.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Ruiz‐CabelloF.M., Rodríguez‐ValverdeM.A. and Cabrerizo‐VílchezM.A.2014. Equilibrium contact angle or the most‐stable contact angle?Advances in Colloid and Interface Science206, 320–327.
    [Google Scholar]
68. SantosJ.E., Douglas, J.Jr, CorberóJ. and LoveraO.M.1990. A model for wave propagation in a porous medium saturated by a two‐phase fluid. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America87, 1439–1448.
    [Google Scholar]
69. SchmelingH.1985. Numerical models on the influence of partial melt on elastic, anelastic and electric properties of rocks. Part I: elasticity and anelasticity. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors41, 34–57.
    [Google Scholar]
70. SharmaR., PrasadM., BatzleM. and VegaS.2013. Sensitivity of flow and elastic properties to fabric heterogeneity in carbonates. Geophysical Prospecting61, 270–286.
    [Google Scholar]
71. ShiZ., ZhangY., LiuM., HanaorD.A. and GanY.2018. Dynamic contact angle hysteresis in liquid bridges. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects555, 365–371.
    [Google Scholar]
72. TadmorR.2004. Line energy and the relation between advancing, receding, and young contact angles. Langmuir20, 7659–7664.
    [Google Scholar]
73. TutuncuA.N., PodioA.L. and SharmaM.M.1998. Nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of sedimentary rocks, Part II: hysteresis effects and influence of type of fluid on elastic moduli. Geophysics63, 195–203.
    [Google Scholar]
74. VegaS., PrajapatJ.V. and Al MazrooeiA.A.2010. Preliminary experiments to evaluate the Gassmann equation in carbonate rocks: Calcite and dolomite. The Leading Edge29, 906–911.
    [Google Scholar]
75. VerwerK., BraaksmaH. and KenterJ.A.2008. Acoustic properties of carbonates: effects of rock texture and implications for fluid substitution. Geophysics73, B51–B65.
    [Google Scholar]
76. VerwerK., EberliG., BaechleG. and WegerR.2010. Effect of carbonate pore structure on dynamic shear moduli. Geophysics75, E1–E8.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Vo‐ThanhD.1995. Influence of fluid chemistry on shear‐wave attenuation and velocity in sedimentary rocks. Geophysical Journal International121, 737–749.
    [Google Scholar]
78. VutukuriV.S.1974. The effect of liquids on the tensile strength of limestone. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts11, 27–29.
    [Google Scholar]
79. WalshJ.B.1965. The effect of cracks on the compressibility of rock. Journal of Geophysical Research70, 381–389.
    [Google Scholar]
80. WangZ., SchmittD.R. and WangR.2015. Does wettability influence seismic wave propagation in liquid‐saturated porous rocks?Geophysical Journal International203, 2182–2188.
    [Google Scholar]
81. YaminskyV.V.2000. Molecular mechanisms of hydrophobic transitions. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology14, 187–233.
    [Google Scholar]
82. YinH., BorgomanoJ.V., WangS., TiennotM., FortinJ. and GuéguenY.2019. Fluid substitution and Shear weakening in clay‐bearing sandstone at seismic frequencies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth124, 1254–1272.
    [Google Scholar]
83. ZhangY.2016. Static and dynamic behaviour of inter‐granular liquid bridges: hysteresis of contact angle and capillary forces. Master's thesis, University of Sydney.
84. ZimmermanR.W.1990. Compressibility of Sandstones, Vol. 29. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]