Perfectly matched layer boundary conditions for the second‐order acoustic wave equation solved by the rapid expansion method

References

1. AbarbanelS., GottliebD. and HesthavenJ.S.1999. Well‐posed perfectly matched layers for adverctive acoustic. Journal of Computational Physics154, 266.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AraujoE.S., PestanaR.C. and SantosA.W.G.2014. Sympletic scheme and the poynting vector in reverse‐time migration. Geophysics79, S163–S172.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BerengerJ.P.1994. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnectic waves. Journal of Computational Physics114, 185–200.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CerjanC., KosloffD., KosloffR. and ReshefM.1985. A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations. Geophysics50, 705–708.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ChewW. and LiuQ.1996. Perfectly matched layers for elastodynamics: a new absorbing boundary condition. Journal of Computational Acoustic4, 341–359.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ClapR.G.2009. Reverse time migration with random boundaries. 79th SEG Annual International meeting, Houston, USA.
7. ClaytonR.W. and EngquistB.1977. Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America6, 1529–1540.
   [Google Scholar]
8. CollinoF. and TsogkaC.2001. Application of the perfectly matched absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media. Geophysics66, 294–307.
   [Google Scholar]
9. CummerS.A.2003. A simple, nearly perfectly matched layer for general electromagnetic media. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters13, 137–140.
   [Google Scholar]
10. EngquistB. and MajdaA.1977. Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. Mathematics of Computation31, 629–651.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GaoY., SongH., ZhangJ. and YaoZ.2017. Comparison of artificial absorbing boundaries for acoustic wave equation modelling. Exploration Geophysics48, 76–93.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GaoY., ZhangJ. and YaoZ.2016. Third‐order symplectic integration method with inverse time dispersion transform for long‐term simulation. Journal of Computational Physics314, 436–449.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HuF.Q.1996. On absorbing boundary conditions of linearized euler equations by a perfectly matched layer. Journal of Computational Physics129, 201.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HuF.Q.2001. A stable, perfectly matched layer for linearized euler equations in unsplit physical variables. Journal of Computational Physics173, 455–480.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HuW., AbubakarA. and HabashyT.M.2007. Application of the nearly perfectly matched layer in acoustic wave modeling. Geophysics72, SM169–SM175.
    [Google Scholar]
16. KassugaT., VelandiaR.M., MoreiraR.M., PessolaniR. and MonteiroF.A.2011. Perfect matched layer optimization for acoustic wave modeling, 12th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society (SBGF), Rio de Janeiro/Brasil.
17. KomatitschD. and TrompJ.2003. A perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition for the second‐order seismic wave equation. Geophysical Journal International154, 146–153.
    [Google Scholar]
18. KosloffD., FilhoA., TessmerE. and BehleA.1989. Numerical solution of the acoustic and elastic wave equation by new rapid expansion method. Geophysical Prospecting37, 383–394.
    [Google Scholar]
19. KosloffR. and KosloffD.1986. Absorbing boundaries for wave propagation problems. Journal of Computational Physics63, 363–376.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lin‐JieS. and Xing‐YaoY.2011. A finite difference scheme based on pml boundary condition with high power grid step variation. Chinese Journal of Geophyssics54, 393–402.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LiuQ. and TaoJ.1997. The perfectly matched layer (pml) for acoustics waves in absorptive media. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America102, 2072–2082.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LiuY., DingL. and SenM.K.2011. Comparisons between the hybrid abc and the pml method for 2d high‐order finite‐difference. SEG Annual International meeting, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 2952–2956.
    [Google Scholar]
23. McGarryR. and MoghaddamP.2009. Npml boundary conditions for second‐order equations. SEG International Exposition and Annual meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstract, 3590–3594.
24. MulderW.A.1997. Experiments with higdon's absorbing boundary. Computational Geosciences1, 85–108.
    [Google Scholar]
25. PestanaR.C. and StoffaP.L.2010. Time evolution of the wave equation using rapid expansion method. Geophysics75, 121–131.
    [Google Scholar]
26. RaoY., WangY., ZhangZ.D., NingY.C., ChenX.H. and LiJ.Y.2016. Reflection seismic waveform tomography of physical modeling data. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering13, 146–151.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SoubarasR. and ZhangY.2008. Two‐steps explicit marching method for reverse time migration, F041, 70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Rome, Italy.
28. Tal‐EzerH.1986. Spectral methods in time for hyperbolic problems. society of industrial and applied mathematics. Journal on Numerical Analysis23, 11–20.
    [Google Scholar]
29. TurkelE. and YefetA.1998. Absorbing pml boundary layers for wave‐like equations. Applied Numerical Mathematics27, 533–557.
    [Google Scholar]
30. XuZ., CaiL. and CongX.2015. An imaging condition for reverse time migration based on wavefield decomposition. Global Geology18, 122–126.
    [Google Scholar]
31. YaoG., SilvaN.V. and WuD.2018. An effective absorbing layer for the boundary condition in acoustic seismic wave simulation. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering15, 495–511.
    [Google Scholar]
32. ZengY., HeJ.Q. and LiuQ.2001. The application of the perfectly matched layer in numerical modeling of wave propagation in poroelastic media. Geophysics66, 1258–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
33. ZhouM.2001. A well‐posed pml absorbing boundary condition for 2d acoustic wave equation. Journal of Computational Physics173, 455–480.
    [Google Scholar]