1887
Volume 68, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Diffracted waves carry high‐resolution information that can help interpreting fine structural details at a scale smaller than the seismic wavelength. However, the diffraction energy tends to be weak compared to the reflected energy and is also sensitive to inaccuracies in the migration velocity, making the identification of its signal challenging. In this work, we present an innovative workflow to automatically detect scattering points in the migration dip angle domain using deep learning. By taking advantage of the different kinematic properties of reflected and diffracted waves, we separate the two types of signals by migrating the seismic amplitudes to dip angle gathers using prestack depth imaging in the local angle domain. Convolutional neural networks are a class of deep learning algorithms able to learn to extract spatial information about the data in order to identify its characteristics. They have now become the method of choice to solve supervised pattern recognition problems. In this work, we use wave equation modelling to create a large and diversified dataset of synthetic examples to train a network into identifying the probable position of scattering objects in the subsurface. After giving an intuitive introduction to diffraction imaging and deep learning and discussing some of the pitfalls of the methods, we evaluate the trained network on field data and demonstrate the validity and good generalization performance of our algorithm. We successfully identify with a high‐accuracy and high‐resolution diffraction points, including those which have a low signal to noise and reflection ratio. We also show how our method allows us to quickly scan through high dimensional data consisting of several versions of a dataset migrated with a range of velocities to overcome the strong effect of incorrect migration velocity on the diffraction signal.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12889
2019-11-06
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/68/3/gpr12889.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12889&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AroraY. and TsvankinI.2017. Analysis of diffractions in dip‐angle gathers for transversely isotropic media. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, 1011–1016.
  2. AudebertF., FroidevauxP., RakotoarisoaH. and SvayLucasJ.2005. Insights into migration in the angle domain. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002, 1188–1191.
  3. CybenkoG.1989. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems2, 303–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DafniR. and SymesW.W.2017. Diffraction imaging by prestack reverse‐time migration in the dip‐angle domain. Geophysical Prospecting65, 295–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. de FigueiredoJ.J.S., OliveiraF., EsmiE., FreitasL., SchleicherJ., NovaisA., et al. 2013. Automatic detection and imaging of diffraction points using pattern recognition. Geophysical Prospecting61, 368–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FomelS., LandaE. and TanerM.T.2007. Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics72, U89–U94.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GuittonA.2018. 3D convolutional neural networks for fault interpretation. Presented at the 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018.
  8. HuangY., ZhangD. and SchusterG.T.2015. Tomographic resolution limits for diffraction imaging. Interpretation3, SF15–SF20.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KanasewichE.R. and PhadkeS.M.1988. Imaging discontinuities on seismic sections. Geophysics53, 334–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KhaidukovV., LandaE. and MoserT.J.2004. Diffraction imaging by focusing defocusing: an outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics69, 1478–1490.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KlokovA., BainaR. and LandaE.2010. Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions in dip angle domain. 72nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  12. KlokovA. and FomelS.2012. Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions using migrated dip‐angle gathers. Geophysics77, S131–S143.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LandaE., FomelS. and ReshefM.2008. Separation, imaging, and velocity analysis of seismic diffractions using migrated dipangle gathers. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2008, 2176–2180.
  14. LandaE., ShtivelmanV. and GelchinskyB.1987. A method for detection of diffracted waves on common‐offset sections. Geophysical Prospecting35, 359–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LeCunY., BengioY. and HintonG.2015. Deep learning. Nature521, 436–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LeCunY., BottouL., BengioY. and HaffnerP.1998. Gradient‐based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE86, 2278–2324.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LongJ., ShelhamerE. and DarrellT.2014. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. CoRR abs/1411.4038.
  18. MertenD. and EttrichN.2015. GRT angle migration a 5D data mapping problem. 2015 International Conference on High Performance Computing Simulation (HPCS), 577–580.
  19. MoserT. and HowardC.2008. Diffraction imaging in depth. Geophysical Prospecting56, 627–641.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PhamN., FomelS. and DunlapD.2018. Automatic channel detection using deep learning. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 2026–2030.
  21. ReshefM. and LandaE.2009. Post‐stack velocity analysis in the dip‐angle domain using diffractions. Geophysical Prospecting57, 811–821.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RonnebergerO., FischerP. and BroxT.2015. U‐Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv e‐prints, arXiv:1505.04597.
  23. RumelhartD.E., HintonG.E. and WilliamsR.J.1988. Learning representations by back‐propagating errors. Cognitive Modeling5, 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SavaP., BiondiB. and tgenJ.2005. Diffraction focusing migration velocity analysis. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2004, 2395–2398.
  25. SerfatyY., ItanL., ChaseD. and KorenZ.2017. Wavefield separation via principle component analysis and deep learning in the local angle domain. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, 991–995.
  26. ShustakM. and LandaE.2017. Time reversal based detection of subsurface scatterers. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, 969–973.
  27. TroreyA.1970. A simple theory for seismic diffractions. Geophysics35, 762–784.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WaldelandA. and SolbergA.2017. Salt classification using deep learning. Presented at the 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017.
  29. WerbosP.1974. Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences. PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12889
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12889
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Imaging; Modelling; Seismics; Signal processing

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error