1887
Volume 68 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The seismic reflection method provides high‐resolution data that are especially useful for discovering mineral deposits under deep cover. A hindrance to the wider adoption of the seismic reflection method in mineral exploration is that the data are often interpreted differently and independently of other geophysical data unless common earth models are used to link the methods during geological interpretation. Model‐based inversion of post‐stack seismic data allows rock units with common petrophysical properties to be identified and permits increased bandwidth to enhance the spatial resolution of the acoustic‐impedance model. However, as seismic reflection data are naturally bandlimited, any inversion scheme depends upon an initial model, and must deal with non‐unique solutions for the inversion. Both issues can be largely overcome by using constraints and integrating prior information. We exploit the abilities of fuzzy c‐means clustering to constrain and to include prior information in the inversion. The use of a clustering constraint for petrophysical values pushes the inversion process to select models that are primarily composed of several discrete rock units and the fuzzy c‐means algorithm allows some properties to overlap by varying degrees. Imposing the fuzzy clustering techniques in the inversion process allows solutions that are similar to the natural geologic patterns that often have a few rock units represented by distinct combinations of petrophysical characteristics. Our tests on synthetic models, with clear and distinct boundaries, show that our methodology effectively recovers the true model. Accurate model recovery can be obtained even when the data are highly contaminated by random noise, where the initial model is homogeneous, or there is minimal prior petrophysical information available. We demonstrate the abilities of fuzzy c‐means clustering to constrain and to include prior information in the acoustic‐impedance inversion of a challenging magnetotelluric/seismic data set from the Carlin Gold District, USA. Using fuzzy c‐means guided inversion of magnetotelluric data to create a starting model for acoustic‐impedance proved important in obtaining the best result. Our inversion results correlate with borehole data and provided a better basis for geological interpretation than the seismic reflection images alone. Low values of the acoustic impedance in the basement rocks were shown to be prospective by geochemical analysis of rock cores, as would be predicted for later gold mineralization in weak, decalcified rocks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12891
2019-12-30
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/68/1/gpr12891.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12891&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. BergetI., MevikB., VebøH. and NæsT.2005. A strategy for finding relevant clusters; with an application to microarray data. Journal of Chemometrics19, 482–491.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BezdekJ.1981. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. Plenum Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BezdekJ.C., EhrlichR. and FullW.1984. FCM: the fuzzy c‐means clustering algorithm. Computers and Geosciences10, 191–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BoschM., CarvajalC., RodriguesJ., TorresA., AldanaM. and SierraJ.2009. Petrophysical seismic inversion conditioned to well‐log data: methods and application to a gas reservoir. Geophysics74, O1–O15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter‐McAuslanA., LelièvreP.G. and FarquharsonC.G.2015. A study of fuzzy c‐means coupling for joint inversion, using seismic tomography and gravity data test scenarios. Geophysics80, W1–W15.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ClineJ.S., HofstraA.H., MunteanJ.L., TosdalR.M. and HickeyK.A.2005. Carlin‐type gold deposits in Nevada: critical geologic characteristics and viable models. In: Economic Geology: One Hundredth Anniversary Volume (eds J.W.Hedenquist, J.F.H.Thompson, R.J.Goldfarb and J.P.Richards). Society of Economic Geologists.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ConstableS.C., ParkerR.L. and ConstableC.G.1987. Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics52, 289–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CookeD.A. and SchneiderW.A.1983. Generalized linear inversion of reflection seismic data. Geophysics48, 665–676.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DahlT. and UrsinB.1991. Parameter estimation in a one‐dimensional anelastic medium. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth96, 20217–20233.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DudaO.R. and HartP.1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DunnJ.C.1973. A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well‐separated clusters. Journal of Cybernetics3, 32–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DunnJ.C.1974. Well‐separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. Journal of Cybernetics4, 95–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GhoshS.K.2000. Limitations on impedance inversion of band‐limited reflection data. Geophysics65, 951–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GonzálezE., MukerjiT. and MavkoG.2008. Seismic inversion combining rock physics and multiple‐point geostatistics. Geophysics73, R11–R21.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GustafsonD.E. and KesselW.C.1978. Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Diego, pp. 761–766.
  16. HamidH. and PidliseckyA.2015. Multitrace impedance inversion with lateral constraints. Geophysics80, M101–M111.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. KieuD.T.2017. Inversion of multiple geophysical data sets using petrophysical constraints. PhD thesis, Curtin University, p. 183.
  18. KieuD.T., KepicA. and PethickA.M.2016. Inversion of magnetotelluric data with fuzzy cluster petrophysical and boundary constraints. In: 25th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Vol. 2016, pp. 1–6. ASEG.
  19. KimD.‐W., LeeK.H. and LeeD.2004. Fuzzy clustering of categorical data using fuzzy centroids. Pattern Recognition Letters25, 1263–1271.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LeC.V.A., HarrisB.D., PethickA.M., Takam TakougangE.M. and HoweB.2016. Semiautomatic and automatic cooperative inversion of seismic and magnetotelluric data. Surveys in Geophysics, 37, 845–896.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LelièvreP.G., FarquharsonC.G. and HurichC.A.2012. Joint inversion of seismic traveltimes and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration. Geophysics77, K1–K15.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LelièvreP.G., OldenburgD.W. and WilliamsN.C.2009. Integrating geological and geophysical data through advanced constrained inversions. Exploration Geophysics40, 334–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LiY. and SunJ.2016. 3D magnetization inversion using fuzzy c‐means clustering with application to geology differentiation. Geophysics81, WC1–WC18.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LindsethR.O.1979. Synthetic sonic logs—a process for stratigraphic interpretation. Geophysics44, 3–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MaX.2001. A constrained global inversion method using an overparameterized scheme: Application to poststack seismic data. Geophysics66, 613–626.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MaagE. and LiY.2018. Discrete‐valued gravity inversion using the guided fuzzy c‐means clustering technique. Geophysics83, G59–G77.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MalehmirA., DurrheimR., BellefleurG., UrosevicM., JuhlinC., WhiteD.J. et al. 2012. Seismic methods in mineral exploration and mine planning: a general overview of past and present case histories and a look into the future. Geophysics77, WC173–WC190.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ManziM., MalehmirA. and DurrheimR.2019. The value of seismics in mineral exploration and mine safety. 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition. EAGE, Extended Abstract.
  29. MejuM.A.1994. Biased estimation: a simple framework for inversion and uncertainty analysis with prior information. Geophysical Journal International119, 521–528.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MisraS. and SacchiM.D.2008. Global optimization with model‐space preconditioning: application to AVO inversion. Geophysics73, R71–R82.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. MorozovI.B. and MaJ.2009. Accurate poststack acoustic‐impedance inversion by well‐log calibration. Geophysics74, R59–R67.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PaascheH. and TronickeJ.2007. Cooperative inversion of 2D geophysical data sets: a zonal approach based on fuzzy c‐means cluster analysis. Geophysics72, A35–A39.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. PaascheH., TronickeJ. and DietrichP.2010. Automated integration of partially colocated models: subsurface zonation using a modified fuzzy c‐means cluster analysis algorithm. Geophysics75, P11–P22.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. PaascheH., TronickeJ., HolligerK., GreenA.G. and MaurerH.2006. Integration of diverse physical‐property models: subsurface zonation and petrophysical parameter estimation based on fuzzy c‐means cluster analyses. Geophysics71, H33–H44.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. PedryczW. and OliveiraJ.V.d.2008. A development of fuzzy encoding and decoding through fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement57, 829–837.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. PhamD.L.2001. Spatial models for fuzzy clustering. Computer Vision and Image Understanding84, 285–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. PilkingtonM. and TodoeschuckJ.P.1992. Natural smoothness constraints in cross‐hole seismic tomography. Geophysical Prospecting40, 227–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. RoubensM.1982. Fuzzy clustering algorithms and their cluster validity. European Journal of Operational Research10, 294–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. RussellB. and HampsonD.1991. Comparison of poststack seismic inversion methods. 61st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 876–878.
  40. SchoddeR.2011. Recent trends in gold discovery. NewGenGold Conference, Perth, 22–23 November, pp. 1–19.
  41. SmithJ.B.2010. Seismic reflection as a direct detector of gold mineralisation in the Carlin district, USA. BSc thesis, Curtin University, pp. 95.
  42. SunJ. and LiY.2011. Geophysical inversion using petrophysical constraints with application to lithology differentiation. 81st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2644–2648.
  43. SunJ. and LiY.2013. Petrophysically constrained geophysical inversion using Parzen window density estimation. 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3051–3056.
  44. SunJ. and LiY.2015. Multidomain petrophysically constrained inversion and geology differentiation using guided fuzzy c‐means clustering. Geophysics80, ID1–ID18.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. SunJ. and LiY.2016. Joint inversion of multiple geophysical data using guided fuzzy c‐means clustering. Geophysics81, ID37–ID57.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. SunJ. and LiY.2017. Joint inversion of multiple geophysical and petrophysical data using generalized fuzzy clustering algorithms. Geophysical Journal International208, 1201–1216.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. TakougangE.M.T., HarrisB., KepicA. and LeC.V.A.2015. Cooperative joint inversion of 3D seismic and magnetotelluric data: with application in a mineral province. Geophysics80, R175–R187.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. ten KroodeF., BerglerS., CorstenC., de MaagJ., StrijbosF. and TijhofH.2013. Broadband seismic data — the importance of low frequencies. Geophysics78, WA3–WA14.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. TeranishiY., MikadaH., GotoT. and TakekawaJ.2013. Three‐dimensional joint inversion of gravity and magnetic anomalies using fuzzy c‐means clustering. SEG Global Meeting Abstracts, 369–373.
  50. WardW.O.C., WilkinsonP.B., ChambersJ.E., OxbyL.S. and BaiL.2014. Distribution‐based fuzzy clustering of electrical resistivity tomography images for interface detection. Geophysical Journal International197, 310–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. WitherlyK.2012. The evolution of minerals exploration over 60 years and the imperative to explore undercover. The Leading Edge31, 292–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. XiaoY., ZhangG., YinX. and ChenJ.2017. Stochastic inversion of elastic impendence based on hybrid parallel tempering and simulated annealing algorithm. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp. 3097–3101.
  53. XieX.L. and BeniG.1991. A validity measure for fuzzy clustering. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on13, 841–847.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12891
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12891
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Carlin gold; Fuzzy clustering; Inversion; Magnetotellurics; Seismic

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error