1887
Volume 68, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Wave equation–based migration velocity analysis techniques aim to construct a kinematically accurate velocity model for imaging or as an initial model for full waveform inversion applications. The most popular wave equation–based migration velocity analysis method is differential semblance optimization, where the velocity model is iteratively updated by minimizing the unfocused energy in an extended image volume. However, differential semblance optimization suffers from artefacts, courtesy of the adjoint operator used in imaging, leading to poor convergence. Recent findings show that true amplitude imaging plays a significant role in enhancing the differential semblance optimization's gradient and reducing the artefacts. Here, we focus on a pseudo‐inverse operator to the horizontally extended Born as a true amplitude imaging operator. For laterally inhomogeneous models, the operator required a derivative with respect to a vertical shift. Extending the image vertically to evaluate such a derivative is costly and impractical. The inverse operator can be simplified in laterally homogeneous models. We derive an extension of the approach to apply the full inverse formula and evaluate the derivative efficiently. We simplified the implementation by applying the derivative to the imaging condition and utilize the relationship between the source and receiver wavefields and the vertical shift. Specifically, we verify the effectiveness of the approach using the Marmousi model and show that the term required for the lateral inhomogeneity treatment has a relatively small impact on the results for many cases. We then apply the operator in differential semblance optimization and invert for an accurate macro‐velocity model, which can serve as an initial velocity model for full waveform inversion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12916
2020-01-09
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlkhalifahT.2016. Full‐model wavenumber inversion: an emphasis on the appropriate wavenumber continuation. Geophysics81, R89–R98.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AlkhalifahT. and WuZ.2017. Migration velocity analysis using pre‐stack wave fields. Geophysical Prospecting65, 639–649.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BaysalE., KosloffD.D. and SherwoodJ.W.C.1983. Reverse time migration. Geophysics48, 1514–1524.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChaurisH. and CocherE.2017. From migration to inversion velocity analysis. Geophysics82, S207–S223.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChaurisH. and CocherE.2018. Review of different expressions for the extended Born approximate inverse operator. 80th EAGE Annual meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, Extended Abstracts, Workshop Programme WS07.
  6. DafniR. and SymesW.W.2016. Kinematic artifacts in the subsurface‐offset extended image and their elimination by a dip‐domain specularity filter. Geophysics81, S477–S495.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FeiT., FehlerC., HildebrandS.T. and ChilcoatS.R. 1996. Depth migration artifacts associated with first‐arrival traveltime. 66th SEG Annual meeting, Denver, CO, Expanded Abstracts, 499–502.
  8. FeiW. and WilliamsonP.2010. On the gradient artifacts in migration velocity analysis based on differential semblance optimization. 80th SEG Annual meeting, Denver, CO, Expanded Abstracts, 4071–4076.
  9. HouJ. and SymesW.W.2015. An approximate inverse to the extended Born modeling operator. Geophysics80, R331–R349.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HouJ. and SymesW.W.2018. Inversion velocity analysis in the subsurface‐offset domain. Geophysics83, R189–R200.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KalitaM. and AlkhalifahT.2016. Common‐image gathers using the excitation amplitude imaging condition. Geophysics81, S261–S269.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LaillyP.1983. The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migrations. In: Conference on Inverse Scattering: Theory and Application, (eds J. BeeBednar, R.Redner and E.Robinson), pp. 206–220. Siam, Philadelphia, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LameloiseC.‐A., ChaurisH. and NobleM.2015. Improving the gradient of the image‐domain objective function using quantitative migration for a more robust migration velocity analysis. Geophysical Prospecting63, 391–404.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LiuY., SymesW. and LiZ.2014. Inversion velocity analysis via differential semblance optimization. 76th EAGE Annual meeting, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Extended Abstracts, Th P02 07.
  15. MulderW. and ten KroodeA.2002. Automatic velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization. Geophysics67, 1184–1191.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PlessixR.‐E.2006. A review of the adjoint‐state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International167, 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RickettJ.E. and SavaP.C.2002. Offset and angle‐domain common image‐point gathers for shot‐profile migration. Geophysics67, 883–889.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SavaP. and FomelS.2006. Time‐shift imaging condition in seismic migration. Geophysics71, S209–S217.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SavaP.C. and FomelS.2003. Angle‐domain common‐image gathers by wavefield continuation methods. Geophysics68, 1065–1074.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ShenP.2005. Wave equation migration velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization. PhD thesis, Rice University.
  21. SunB. and AlkhalifahT.2017. Automatic wave equation migration velocity analysis by focusing subsurface virtual sources. Geophysics83, U1–U8.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SunB. and AlkhalifahT.2019. The application of an optimal transport to a preconditioned data matching function for robust waveform inversion. Geophysics84, R923–R945.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SymesW.W.2008. Migration velocity analysis and waveform inversion. Geophysical Prospecting56, 765–790.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. TarantolaA.1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ten KroodeF.2012. A wave‐equation‐based Kirchhoff operator. Inverse Problems28, 115013.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12916
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12916
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Full‐waveform inversion; Imaging; MVA; Velocity analysis

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error