1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 68, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 68, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Depletion or injection into a reservoir implies stress changes and strains in the reservoir and its surroundings. This may lead to measurable time‐shifts for seismic waves propagating in the subsurface. To better understand the offset dependence of time‐shifts in the overburden, we have systematically quantified the time‐shifts of three different overburden shales in controlled laboratory tests. These experiments may be viewed as an analogue to the time‐shifts recorded from seismic field surveys. For a range of different stress paths, defined as the ratio between the horizontal and the vertical stress changes, the changes of the P‐wave velocities in different directions were measured such that the offset dependence of time‐shifts for different stress paths could be studied. The time‐shifts are stress path dependent, which is particularly pronounced at large offsets. For all stress paths, the time‐shifts exhibit a linearly decreasing trend with increasing offset, that is, a negative offset gradient. At zero offset, for which the ray path is normal to the bedding, the time‐shifts are similar for all investigated stress paths. The isotropic stress path is associated with the smallest offset gradient of the time‐shifts. In contrast, the constant‐mean‐stress path shows the largest gradient with a flip in the polarity of the time‐shifts for the largest offsets. The separate contributions from the strain and velocity changes to the time‐shifts were also quantified. The time‐shifts for the isotropic stress path are dominated by the contribution from velocity changes at all offsets. In contrast, the strain contributes significantly to the time‐shifts at small offsets for the constant‐mean‐stress path. This shows that the offset dependence in pre‐stack seismic data may be a key to understand the changes of subsurface stresses, pore pressure and strain upon depletion or injection. To utilize this knowledge from laboratory experiments, calibrated rock physics models and correlations are needed to constrain the seismic time‐shifts and to obtain an adequately updated geological model reflecting the true anisotropic nature of the subsurface. This may have important implications for improved recovery and safety, particularly in mature fields.

© 2020 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2020 The Authors. Geophysical Prospecting published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12963
2020-05-21
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12963
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/68/6/gpr12963.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12963&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Angus, D.A., Dutko, M., Kristiansen, T.G., Fisher, Q.J., Kendall, J.‐M., Baird, A.F., Verdon, J.P.et al. (2015) Integrated hydro‐mechanical and seismic modelling of the Valhall reservoir: a case study of predicting subsidence, AVOA and microseismicity. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 2, 32–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakk, A., Stenebråten, J.F., Lozovyi, S., Bauer, A., Sønstebø, E.F., Fjær, E., Bhuiyan, M.H.et al. (2018) Static and dynamic characterization of a deep overburden shale. 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Copenhagen, Denmark, Expanded Abstracts, We‐A11‐09. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201801020.
  3. Bathija, A.P., Batzle, M.L. and Prasad, M. (2009) An experimental study of the dilation factor. Geophysics, 74(4), E181–E191.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Batzle, M.L., Han, D.‐H. and Hofmann, R. (2006) Fluid mobility and frequency‐dependent seismic velocity – direct measurements. Geophysics, 71(1), N1–N9.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Calvert, M.A., Cherrett, A.J., Micksch, U., Bourgeois, F.G. and Calvert, A.S. (2018) New time lapse seismic attribute linking 4D and geomechanics. 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Copenhagen, Denmark, Expanded Abstracts, Tu‐A15‐12. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201800698.
  6. De Gennaro, S., Onaisi, A., Grandi, A., Ben‐Brahim, L. and Neillo, V. (2008) 4D reservoir geomechanics: a case study from the HP/HT reservoirs of the Elgin and Franklin fields. First Break, 26, 53–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dillen, M.W.P., Cruts, H.M.A., Groenenboom, J., Fokkema, J.T. and Duijndam, A.J.W. (1999) Ultrasonic velocity and shear‐wave splitting behaviour of a Colton sandstone under a changing triaxial stress. Geophysics, 64, 1603–1607.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ditlevsen, F., Bourgeois, F. and Calvert, M. (2018) Handling wellbore instability in overburden Tertiary shales. 80th Annual EAGE Meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, Expanded Abstracts, Tu‐C‐07. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201800721.
  9. Dudley, J.W., Brignoli, M., Crawford, B.R., Ewy, R.T., Love, D.K., McLennan, J.D., Ramos, G.G.et al. (2016) ISRM suggested method for uniaxial‐strain compressibility testing for reservoir geomechanics. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49, 4153‐4178.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fjær, E. (2006) Modeling the stress dependence of elastic wave velocities in soft rocks. 41st US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Golden, USA, ARMA 06‐1070. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ARMA-06-1070.
  11. Fjær, E., Holt, R.M., Horsrud, P., Raaen, A.M. and Risnes, R. (2008) Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics. 2nd edn. Elsevier Science. https://www.elsevier.com/books/petroleum-related-rock-mechanics/fjar/978-0-444-50260-5.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuck, R.F., Bakulin, A. and Tsvankin, I. (2009) Theory of traveltime shifts around compacting reservoirs: 3D solutions for heterogeneous anisotropic media. Geophysics, 74(1), D25–D36.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fuck, R.F. and Tsvankin, I. (2009) Analysis of the symmetry of a stressed medium using nonlinear elasticity. Geophysics, 74(5), WB79–WB87.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Geertsma, J. (1985) Some rock‐mechanical aspects of oil and gas well completions. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 25, 848‐856.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Grechka, V. and Tsvankin, I. (1998) Feasibility of nonhyperbolic moveout inversion in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics, 63, 957‐969.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Guilbot, J. and Smith, B. (2002) 4‐D constrained depth conversion for reservoir compaction estimation: application to Ekofisk field. The Leading Edge, 21, 302–308.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, S.A., MacBeth, C., Barkved, O.I. and Wild, P. (2002) Time‐lapse seismic monitoring of compaction and subsidence at Valhall through cross‐matching and interpreted warping of 3D streamer and OBC data. 72nd SEG Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1696‐1699. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817004.
  18. Hatchell, P.J., van den Beukel, A., Molenaar, M.M, Maron, K.P., Kenter, C.J., Stammeijer, J.G.F., van der Velde, J.J.et al. (2003) Whole Earth 4D: reservoir monitoring geomechanics. 73rd SEG Annual Meeting, Dallas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1330–1333. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817532.
  19. Hatchell, P. and Bourne, S. (2005) Rocks under strain: strain‐induced time‐lapse time shifts are observed for depleting reservoirs. The Leading Edge, 24, 1222–1225.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hawkins, K. (2008) Defining the extent of the compacting Elgin reservoir by measuring stress‐induced anisotropy. First Break, 26, 81–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawkins, K., Harris, P. and Conroy, G. (2006) Estimating production‐induced stress changes from 4D finite offset timeshifts. 68th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, Expanded Abstracts, P196. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201402276.
  22. Hawkins, K., Howe, S., Hollingworth, S., Conroy, G., Ben‐Brahim, L., Tindle, C., Taylor, N.et al. (2007) Geomechanical stresses from 4D timeshifts measured around the depleting Franklin and Elgin reservoirs. 77th SEG Annual Meeting, San Antonio, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 2862–2866. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2793061.
  23. Herwanger, J. (2008) R we there yet?70th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Rome, Italy, Expanded Abstracts, I029. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20147816.
  24. Herwanger, J.V. and Horne, S.A. (2009) Linking reservoir geomechanics and time‐lapse seismics: predicting anisotropic velocity changes and seismic attributes. Geophysics, 74(4), W13–W33.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Herwanger, J., Palmer, E. and Schiøtt, C.R. (2007) Anisotropic velocity changes in seismic time‐lapse data. 77th SEG Annual Meeting, San Antonio, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 2883–2887. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2793065.
  26. Hodgson, N. (2009) Inversion for reservoir pressure change using overburden strain measurements determined from 4D seismic. PhD thesis, Heriot‐Watt University, Edinburgh, UK. https://www.ros.hw.ac.uk/handle/10399/2320.
  27. Holt, R.M. (2016) Bounds of elastic parameters characterizing transversely isotropic media: application to shales. Geophysics, 81(5), C243–C252.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Holt, R.M., Bauer, A. and Bakk, A. (2018) Stress‐path‐dependent velocities in shales: impact on 4D seismic interpretation. Geophysics, 83(6), MR353–MR367.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Holt, R.M., Bhuiyan, M.H., Kolstø, M.I., Bakk, A., Stenebråten, J.F. and Fjær, E. (2011) Stress‐induced versus lithological anisotropy in compacted claystones and soft shales. The Leading Edge, 30, 312–317
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hornby, B.E. (1998) Experimental laboratory determination of the dynamic elastic properties of wet, drained shales. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 29945–29964.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Horsrud, P., Sønstebø, E.F. and Bøe, R. (1998) Mechanical and petrophysical properties of North Sea shales. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 35, 1009–1020.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson, P.A. and Rasolofosaon, P.N.J. (1996) Nonlinear elasticity and stress‐induced anisotropy in rock. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 3113–3124.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones, L.E.A. and Wang, H.F. (1981) Ultrasonic velocities in Cretaceous shales from the Williston Basin. Geophysics, 46, 288–297.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kenter, C.J., Van den Beukel, A.C., Hatchell, P.J., Maron, K.P., Molenaar, M.M. and Stammeijer, J.G.F. (2004) Evaluation of reservoir characteristics from time shifts in the overburden. Gulf Rocks 2004; 6th North America Rock Mechanics Symposium (NARMS), Paper, ARMA/NARMS 04‐627. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ARMA-04-627.
  35. Kudarova, A., Hatchell, P., Brain, J. and MacBeth, C. (2016) Offset‐dependence of production‐related 4D time‐shifts: real data examples and modelling. 86th SEG Annual Meeting, Dallas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 5395–5399. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13611549.1.
  36. Landrø, M. and Janssen, R. (2002) Estimating compaction and velocity changes from time‐lapse near and far offset stacks. 64th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Florence, Italy, Extended Abstracts, P036. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.5.P036.
  37. Landrø, M. and Stammeijer, J. (2004) Quantitative estimation of compaction and velocity changes using 4D impedance and traveltime changes. Geophysics, 69, 949–957.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lavrov, A. (2016) Dynamics of stresses and fractures in reservoir and cap rock under production and injection. Energy Procedia, 86, 381–390.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lozovyi, S. (2018) Seismic dispersion and the relation between static and dynamic Stiffness of shales. PhD thesis, NTNU, Norway. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2564704.
  40. Lozovyi, S., Bauer, A., Giger, S. and Chakraborty, S. (2018) Static vs. dynamic stiffness of shales: frequency and stress effects. 52nd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Golden, USA, ARMA 18‐257. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332809564_Static_vs_Dynamic_Stiffness_of_Shales_Frequency_and_Stress_Effects.
  41. MacBeth, C., Kudarova, A. and Hatchell, P.J. (2018) A semi‐empirical model of strain sensitivity for 4D seismic interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 66, 1327–1348.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. MacBeth, C., Mangriotis, M.‐D. and Amini, H. (2019) Post‐stack 4D seismic time‐shifts: interpretation and evaluation. Geophysical Prospecting, 67, 3–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Mahi, A. (2003) Stress path of depleting reservoirs. MSc thesis, NTNU, Norway.
  44. Morita, N. and Fuh, G.‐F. (2009) Parametric analysis of stress reduction in the caprock above compacting reservoirs. SPE Drilling & Completion, 24, 659–670.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mulders, F.M.M. (2003) Modeling of stress development and fault slip in and around a producing gas reservoir. PhD thesis, TU Delft, the Netherlands. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3Abe742135-10d7-4d69-bdee-f808b5926065.
  46. Pervukhina, M., Dewhurst, D., Gurevich, B., Kuila, U., Siggins, T., Raven, M. and Bolås, H.M.N. (2008) Stress‐dependent elastic properties of shales: measurement and modelling. The Leading Edge, 27, 772–779.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Prioul, R., Bakulin, A. and Bakulin, V. (2004) Nonlinear rock physics model for estimation of 3D subsurface stress in anisotropic formations: theory and laboratory verification. Geophysics, 69, 415–425.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Rickett, J., Duranti, L., Hudson, T., Regel, B. and Hodgson, N. (2007) 4D time strain and the seismic signature of geomechanical compaction at Genesis. The Leading Edge, 26, 644–647.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Rodriguez‐Herrera, A., Koutsabeloulis, N., Onaisi, A., Fiore, J. and Selva, F. (2015) Stress‐induced signatures in 4D seismic data: evidence of overburden stress arching. 85th SEG Annual Meeting, New Orleans, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 5368–5372. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5900945.1.
  50. Røste, T., Dybvik, O.P. and Søreide, O.K. (2015) Overburden 4D time shifts induced by reservoir compaction at Snorre field. The Leading Edge, 34, 1366–1374.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Røste, T. and Ke, G. (2017) Overburden 4D time shifts – indicating undrained areas and fault transmissibility in the reservoir. The Leading Edge, 36, 423–430.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Røste, T., Stovas, A. and Landrø, M. (2005) Estimation of layer thickness and velocity changes using 4D prestack seismic data. 67th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Madrid, Spain, Extended Abstracts, C010. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2335657.
  53. Sarout, J., Esteban, L., Delle Piane, C., Maney, B. and Dewhurst, D.N. (2014) Elastic anisotropy of opalinus clay under variable saturation and triaxial stress. Geophysical Journal International, 198, 1662–1682.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Sayers, C.M. and Kachanov, M. (1995) Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 4149–4156.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Sayers, C.M. and Schutjens, P.M.T.M. (2007) An introduction to reservoir geomechanics. The Leading Edge, 26, 597–601.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Shapiro, S.A. (2017) Stress impact on elastic anisotropy of triclinic porous and fractured rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 122, 2034–2053.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Skempton, A.W. (1954) The pore‐pressure coefficients A and B. Géotechnique, 4, 143–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Spencer, J.W. (1981) Stress relaxations at low frequencies in fluid‐saturated rocks: attenuation and modulus dispersion. Journal of Geophysical Research, 86, 1803–1812.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Staples, R., Ita, J., Burrell, R. and Nash, R. (2007) Monitoring pressure depletion and improving geomechanical models of the Shearwater field using 4D seismic. The Leading Edge, 26, 636–642.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Szewczyk, D., Bauer, A. and Holt, R.M. (2018) Stress‐dependent elastic properties of shales–laboratory experiments at seismic and ultrasonic frequencies. Geophysical Journal International, 212, 189–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Tempone, P., Landrø, M., Fjær, E. and Inoue, N. (2009) Effects on time‐lapse seismic of a hard rock layer beneath a compacting reservoir. SPE EUROPEC/71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Expanded Abstracts, SPE 121081. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-121081-MS.
  62. Thomsen, L. (1986) Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics, 51, 1954–1966.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Thurston, R.N. and Brugger, K. (1964) Third‐order elastic constants and the velocity of small amplitude elastic waves in homogeneously stressed media. Physical Review, 133(6A), A1604–A1610.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Toomey, A., Fowler, S., van Gestel, J.P., Kristiansen, T.G., Brew, G., Horiuchi, M. and Levine, R. (2017) Stress arching and its impact on 4D seismic amplitudes and traveltimes. The Leading Edge, 36, 895–901.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Yang, D., Liu, F., Morton, S., Malcolm, A. and Fehler, M. (2016) Time‐lapse full‐waveform inversion with ocean‐bottom‐cable data: application on Valhall field. Geophysics, 81(4), R225–R235.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Yuan, R.S., Schutjens, P.M.T.M., Bourgeois, F.G. and Calvert, M.A. (2018) Fault slip or bed‐parallel shear? – a multi‐scenario modeling approach to investigating well deformation in the deep overburden of a compacting reservoir in the North Sea. 52nd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Seattle, USA, ARMA 18‐610. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ARMA-2018-610.
  67. Zadeh, H.M, Landrø, M. and Barkved, O.I. (2011) Long‐offset time‐lapse seismic: tested on the Valhall LoFS data. Geophysics, 76(2), O1–O13.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Zoback, M.D. and Zinke, J.C. (2002) Production‐induced normal faulting in the Valhall and Ekofisk oil fields. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 159, 403–420.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12963
Loading
Offset dependence of overburden time‐shifts from ultrasonic data
Geophysical Prospecting 68, 1847 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12963
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12963
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12963
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy; Monitoring; Rock Physics; Seismics; Time lapse

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error