Design considerations for using Distributed Acoustic Sensing for cross‐well seismics: A case study for CO2 storage

References

1. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T. and Mavko, G. (2010) Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barrio, M., Bakk, A., Grimstad, A.‐A., Querendez, E., Jones, D.G., Kuras, O. etal. (2014) CO2 migration monitoring methodology in the shallow subsurface: lessons learned from the CO2 FIELDLAB project. Energy Procedia, 51, 65–74.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakk, A., Girard, J.F., Lindeberg, E., Aker, E., Wertz, F., Buddensiek, M., Barrio, M. etal. (2012) CO2 field lab at Svelvik ridge: site suitability. Energy Procedia, 23, 306–312.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T. (1966) Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 92(2), 61–90.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carman, P.C. (1961) L'ecoulement des gaz a travers les milieux poreux. Saclay (in French): Institut National des Sciences et Techniques Nucleaires.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dean, T., Cuny, T. and Hartog, A.H. (2017) The effect of gauge length on axially incident P‐waves measured using fibre optic distributed vibration sensing. Geophysical Prospecting, 65(1), 184–193.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dean, T., Papp, B. and Hartog, A. (2015) Wavenumber Response of Data Recorded Using Distributed Fibre‐optic Systems. 3rd EAGE Workshop on Borehole Geophysics, Athens, Greece, Extended Abstracts, BGP07.
8. Eliasson, P., Ringstad, C., Grimstad, A.‐A., Jordan, M. and Romdhane, A. (2018) Svelvik CO2 field lab: upgrade and experimental campaign. Fifth EAGE CO2 Geological Storage Workshop, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Extended Abstracts, Th CO2 02.
9. Gassmann, F. (1951) Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 96, 1–23.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Greenberg, M. and Castagna, J. (1992) Shear‐wave velocity estimation in porous rocks: Theoretical formulation, preliminary verification and applications 1. Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 195–209.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grimstad, A.‐A., Sundal, A., Hagby, K.F. and Ringstad, C. (2018) Modelling medium‐depth CO2 injection at the Svelvik CO2 Field Laboratory in Norway. Proceedings of 14th Greenhouse Gas Technologies Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
12. Hagby, K.F. (2018) Modelling MEDIUM‐DEpth CO2 Injection at the Svelvik CO2 Field Laboratory in Norway. Master thesis, NTNU.
13. Hashin, Z. and Shtrikman, S. (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 11(2), 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hornman, K., Kuvshinov, B.N., Zwartjes, P. and Franzen, A. (2013) Field trial of a broadside‐sensitive distributed acoustic sensing cable for surface seismic. 75th EAGE Annual Meeting, London, UK, Expanded Abstracts, Tu 04 08.
15. Kuvshinov, B.N. (2016) Interaction of helically wound fibre‐optic cables with plane seismic waves. Geophysical Prospecting, 64(3), 671–688.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ning, I.L.C. and Sava, P. (2016) Multicomponent distributed acoustic sensing. 86th SEG Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 5597–5602.
17. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J. (2009) The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Peterson, J.E., Paulsson, B.N.P. and McEvilly, T.V. (1985) Applications of algebraic reconstruction techniques to crosshole seismic data. Geophysics, 50(10), 1566—1580.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ringstad, C., Eliasson, P., Jordan, M. and Grimstad, A.‐A. (2018) Re‐vitalization and upgrade of the Svelvik CO2 Field Laboratory in Norway. Proceedings of 14th Greenhouse Gas Technologies Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
20. Weinzierl, W., Wiese, B., Jordan, M., Schmidt‐Hattenberger, C., Eliasson, P., Ringstad, C. etal. (2018) Pre‐operational considerations in a poro‐elastic site assessment for the Svelvik Field Lab. Fifth CO2 Geological Storage, EAGE, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Expanded Abstracts, Fr CO2 P04.
21. Wuestefeld, A. and Wilks, M. (2019) How to twist and turn a fiber: performance modeling for optimal DAS acquisitions. The Leading Edge, 38(3), 226–231
    [Google Scholar]