Electrical resistivity tomography with smooth sparse regularization

References

1. Acar, R. and Vogel, C.R. (1994) Analysis of bounded variation penalty methods for ill‐posed problems. Inverse Problems, 10(6), 1217–1229.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Auken, E. and Vest Christiansen, A. (2004) Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data. Geophysics, 69(3), 752–761.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bergmann, P., Schmidt‐Hattenberger, C., Kiessling, D., Rücker, C., Labitzke, T., Henninges, J., et al. (2012) Surface‐downhole electrical resistivity tomography applied to monitoring of CO2 storage at Ketzin, Germany. Geophysics, 77(6), B253–B267.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blaschek, R., Hördt, A. and Kemna, A. (2008) A new sensitivity‐controlled focusing regularization scheme for the inversion of induced polarization data based on the minimum gradient support. Geophysics, 73(2), F45–F54.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Borsic, A., Graham, B.M., Adler, A. and Lionheart, W.R.B. (2010) In vivo impedance imaging with total variation regularization. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 29(1), 44–54.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Candansayar, M.E. (2008) Two‐dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data with consecutive use of conjugate gradient and least‐squares solution with singular value decomposition algorithms. Geophysical Prospecting, 56(1), 141–157.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cao, J., Wang, Y. and Yang, C. (2012) Seismic data restoration based on compressive sensing using regularization and zero‐norm sparse optimization. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(2), 239–251.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cheng, K.S., Isaacson, D., Newell, J.C. and Gisser, D.G. (1989) Electrode models for electric current computed tomography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 36(9), 918–924.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Doetsch, J., Linde, N., Vogt, T., Binley, A. and Green, A.G. (2012) Imaging and quantifying salt‐tracer transport in a riparian groundwater system by means of 3D ERT monitoring. Geophysics, 77(5), B207–B218.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Egbert, G.D. (2012) Hybrid conjugate gradient‐occam algorithms for inversion of multifrequency and multitransmitter EM data. Geophysical Journal International, 190(1), 255–266.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Farquharson, C.G. (2008) Multidimensional minimum‐structure inversions. Geophysics, 73(1), K1–K9.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gallistl, J., Weigand, M., Stumvoll, M., Ottowitz, D., Glade, T. and Orozco, A.F. (2018) Delineation of subsurface variability in clay‐rich landslides through spectral induced polarization imaging and electromagnetic methods. Engineering Geology, 245, 292–308.
    [Google Scholar]
13. González, G., Huttunen, J.M.J., Kolehmainen, V., Seppänen, A. and Vauhkonen, M. (2016) Experimental evaluation of 3D electrical impedance tomography with total variation prior. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 24(8), 1411–1431.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Grayver, A.V., Streich, R. and Ritter, O. (2013) Three‐dimensional parallel distributed inversion of CSEM data using a direct forward solver. Geophysical Journal International, 193(3), 1432–1446.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gündogdu, N.Y. and Candansayar, M.E. (2018) Three‐dimensional regularized inversion of DC resistivity data with different stabilizing functionals. Geophysics, 83(6), E399–E407.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Günther, T., Rücker, C. and Spitzer, K. (2006) Three‐dimensional modeling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography‐II: Inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 166(2), 506–517.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hallaji, M., Seppänen, A. and Pour‐Ghaz, M. (2015) Electrical resistance tomography to monitor unsaturated moisture flow in cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 69, 10–18.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haslam, E.P., Gunn, D.A., Jackson, P.D., Lovell, M.A., Aydin, A., Prance, R.J. and Watson, P. (2014) Novel laboratory methods for determining the fine scale electrical resistivity structure of core. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 111, 384–392.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hauptmann, A., Kolehmainen, V., Mach, N.M., Savolainen, T., Seppänen, A. and Siltanen, S. (2017) Open 2D electrical impedance tomography data archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01178.
20. Johnson, T.C., Versteeg, R.J., Ward, A., Day‐Lewis, F.D. and Revil, A. (2010) Improved hydrogeophysical characterization and monitoring through parallel modeling and inversion of time‐domain resistivity and induced‐polarization data. Geophysics, 75(4), 1JA–Z98.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Johnston, D.H. (1987) Physical properties of shale at temperature and pressure. Geophysics, 52(10), 1391–1401.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Karhunen, K., Seppänen, A., Lehikoinen, A., Monteiro, P.J.M. and Kaipio, J.P. (2010) Electrical resistance tomography imaging of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 40(1), 137–145.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Last, B.J. and Kubik, K. (1983) Compact gravity inversion. Geophysics, 48(6), 713–721.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lovell, M.A., Jackson, P.D., Harvey, P.K. and Flint, R.C. (2006) High‐resolution petrophysical characterization of samples from an aeolian sandstone: the Permian Penrith sandstone of NW England. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 263(1), 49–63.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ma, H., Tan, H. and Guo, Y. (2015) Three‐dimensional induced polarization parallel inversion using nonlinear conjugate gradients method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, Article ID 464793.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Martin, T. and Günther, T. (2013) Complex resistivity tomography (CRT) for fungus detection on standing oak trees. European Journal of Forest Research, 132(5–6), 765–776.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mcgillivray, P.R. and Oldenburg, D.W. (1990) Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the non‐linear inverse problem a comparative study. Geophysical Prospecting, 38(5), 499–524.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Nguyen, F., Kemna, A., Robert, T. and Hermans, T. (2016) Data‐driven selection of the minimum‐gradient support parameter in time‐lapse focused electric imaging. Geophysics, 81(1), A1–A5.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Peruzzo, L., Chou, C., Wu, Y., Schmutz, M., Mary, B., Wagner, F.M., et al. (2020) Imaging of plant current pathways for non‐invasive root phenotyping using a newly developed electrical current source density approach. Plant and Soil, 450(1–2), 567–584.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pidlisecky, A., Haber, E. and Knight, R. (2007) RESINVM3D: a 3D resistivity inversion package. Geophysics, 72(2), H1–H10.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pidlisecky, A. and Knight, R. (2008) FW2_5D: a MATLAB 2.5‐D electrical resistivity modeling code. Computers and Geosciences, 34(12), 1645–1654.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Polydorides, N. (2002) Image reconstruction algorithms for soft‐field tomography. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
33. Portniaguine, O. and Zhdanov, M.S. (1999) Focusing geophysical inversion images. Geophysics, 64(3), 874–887.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rodi, W. and Mackie, R.L. (2001) Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 1D magnetotelluric inversion. Geophysics, 66(1), 174–187.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rücker, C., Günther, T. and Wagner, F.M. (2017) PyGIMLi: an open‐source library for modelling and inversion in geophysics. Computers and Geosciences, 109, 106–123.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S. and Fatemi, E. (1992) Nonlinear total variation‐based noise removal algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 60(1–4), 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sasaki, Y. (1994) 3‐D resistivity inversion using the finite‐element method. Geophysics, 59(12), 1839–1848.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Schöberl, J. (1997) An advancing front 2D/3D‐mesh generator based on abstract rules. Computing and Visualization in Science, 1(1), 41–52.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schöberl, J. (2014) C++ 11 implementation of finite elements in NGSolve. Preprint, 30(30).
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sidky, E.Y., Chartrand, R., Boone, J.M. and Pan, X. (2014) Constrained TpV minimization for enhanced exploitation of gradient sparsity: application to CT image reconstruction. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 2, 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Tikhonov, A.N. and Arsenin, V.Y. (1977) Solution of Ill‐Posed Problems. New York: Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tropp, J.A. and Gilbert, A.C. (2007) Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(12), 4655–4666.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Vogel, C.R. and OmanM.E. (1996) Iterative methods for total variation denoising. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 17(1), 227–238.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Zhai, H., Chang, X., Wang, Y., Xue, Z., Lei, X. and Zhang, Y. (2017) Sensitivity analysis of seismic velocity and attenuation variations for Longmaxi Shale during hydraulic fracturing testing in laboratory. Energies, 10(9), 1393.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Zhang, L., Koyama, T., Utada, H., Yu, P. and Wang, J. (2012) A regularized three‐dimensional magnetotelluric inversion with a minimum gradient support constraint. Geophysical Journal International, 189(1), 296–316.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Zhang, Y. and Sun, G. (2018) Stagewise arithmetic orthogonal matching pursuit. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 25(2), 221–228.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Zhdanov, M.S. (2002) Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems. Vol. 36. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Zhdanov, M.S. (2009) New advances in regularized inversion of gravity and electromagnetic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 57(4), 463–478.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Zhu, W., Chang, X., Wang, Y., Zhai, H. and Yao, Z. (2018) Reconstruction of hydraulic fractures using passive ultrasonic travel‐time tomography. Energies, 11(5), 1321.
    [Google Scholar]