1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 70, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 70, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Among many multiple attenuation methods, parabolic Radon transform has been widely used due to its efficiency and effectiveness. However, there are two factors that restrict the application of Radon transform: (1) the smearing caused by finite seismic acquisition aperture and discrete sampling of seismic data and (2) the destruction of the amplitude versus offset signature in seismic data. Therefore, a high‐order sparse Radon transform in the mixed frequency–time domain with minimization is proposed. The metric has been proved an unbiased approximation to norm, which helps improve the sparsity and resolution of the Radon model. By combining the orthogonal polynomial transform, which can fit the amplitude variations of seismic data, the amplitude versus offset signature is also considered. Furthermore, the 2D Radon transform is extended to 3D by modifying the augmented Lagrangian in the alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm. Compared with the 2D algorithm, 3D Radon transform considers seismic wave propagation in three dimensions, which can describe the wavefield more accurately. The proposed method is applied to multiple attenuation examples based on both synthetic and real 3D data examples to demonstrate its effectiveness, compared with some existing high‐resolution techniques and the corresponding 2D algorithm.

© 2022 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2022 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13185
2022-04-14
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13185
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cary, P.W. (1998) The simplest discrete Radon transform. 68th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 1999–2002. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1820335.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Donati, M.S. and Martin, N.W. (1995) Seismic reconstruction using a 3D tau‐p transform. CREWES Research Report, 7, 11/1–11/16.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Donoho, D.L. (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52, 1289–1306. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2006.871582.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Esser, E., Lou, Y. and Xin, J. (2013) A method for finding structured sparse solutions to nonnegative least squares problems with applications. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 6, 2010–2046. https://doi.org/10.1137/13090540X.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fan, J. and Li, R. (2001) Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1348–1360. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501753382273.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Fan, J.W., Chun, L.Z., Liu, X.T., Liu, Y.J., Zhang, K., Branch, T. and China, C. (2015) High‐resolution radon transform based on sparse constraint method and its application to multiple attenuation. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 39, 1245–1250.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Geng, W., Chen, X., Li, J., Ma, J., Wu, F., Xu, Y. and Li, X. (2020) 3D high order de‐aliased Radon transform for AVO‐preserving data reconstruction. 82nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition. EAGE Extended Abstracts, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.202011368.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Hampson, D. (1986) Inverse velocity stacking for multiple elimination. 56th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 422–424. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1893060.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hugonnet, P., Boelle, J.L. and Mihoub, M. (2008) High resolution 3D parabolic Radon filtering. 78th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 2492–2496. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3063861.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Jafarpour, B., Goyal, V.K., McLaughlin, D.B. and Freeman, W.T. (2009) Transform‐domain sparsity regularization for inverse problems in geosciences. Geophysics, 74(5), R69–R83. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3157250.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Johansen, T.A., Bruland, L. and Lutro, J. (1995) Tracking the amplitude versus offset (AVO) by using orthogonal polynomials. Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2478.1995.tb00134.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, T. and Pong, T.K. (2017) Further properties of the forward‐backward envelope with applications to difference‐of‐convex programming. Computational Optimization and Applications, 67, 489–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589‐017‐9900‐2.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Lou, Y., Osher, S. and Xin, J. (2015) Computational aspects of constrained L1‐L2 minimization for compressive sensing. In: Le Thi,H., Pham Dinh,T. and Nguyen,N. (Eds.) Modelling, Computation and Optimization in Information Systems and Management Sciences:. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 359. Cham: Springer, pp. 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐319‐18161‐5_15.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Lu, W. (2013) An accelerated sparse time‐invariant Radon transform in the mixed frequency‐time domain based on iterative 2D model shrinkage. Geophysics, 78(4), V147–V155. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012‐0439.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Ma, J., Xu, G., Chen, X., Wang, X. and Hao, Z. (2020) Multiple attenuation with 3D high‐order high‐resolution parabolic Radon transform using lower frequency constraints. Geophysics, 85(3), V317–V328. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018‐0742.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ma, T.‐H., Lou, Y. and Huang, T.‐Z. (2017) Truncated l1–2 models for sparse recovery and rank minimization. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 10, 1346–1380. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1098929.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Sacchi, M.D. and Porsani, M. (1999) Fast high resolution parabolic Radon transform. 69th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 1477–1480. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1820798.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Sacchi, M.D. and Ulrych, T.J. (1995) High‐resolution velocity gathers and offset space reconstruction. Geophysics, 60, 1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443845.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Schonewille, M.A. and Aaron, P.A. (2007) Applications of time‐domain high‐resolution Radon demultiple. 77th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 2565–2569. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2793000.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Tao, P.D. and An, L.T.H. (1998) A D.C. optimization algorithm for solving the trust‐region subproblem. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 8, 476–505. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623494274313.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Thorson, J.R. and Claerbout, J.F. (1985) Velocity‐stack and slant‐stack stochastic inversion. Geophysics, 50, 2727–2741. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441893.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Trad, D., Ulrych, T. and Sacchi, M. (2003) Latest views of the sparse Radon transform. Geophysics, 68, 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1543224.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Ursin, B. and Dahl, T. (1990) Least‐squares estimation of reflectivity polynomials. 60th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 1069–1071. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1889910.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Vyas, M., Etgen, J. and Liao, Q. (2016) Sparse radon transform in extended domain. 86th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 4540–4544. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016‐13845990.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, L., Zhou, H., Wang, Y., Yu, B., Zhang, Y., Liu, W. and Chen, Y. (2019) Three‐parameter prestack seismic inversion based on L1–2 minimization. Geophysics, 84(5), R753–R766. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018‐0730.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, S., Li, J., Xue, Y., Zhou, Y. and Ma, X. (2017) AVO‐preserving data reconstruction by 3D high‐order sparse‐parabolic Radon transform. 87th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 4338–4342. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17659348.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, Y., Ma, X., Zhou, H. and Chen, Y. (2018) L1–2 minimization for exact and stable seismic attenuation compensation. Geophysical Journal International, 213, 1629–1646. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy064.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Wei, X. and Sun, J. (2020) Uncertainty analysis of joint inversion using mixed Lp‐norm regularization. 90th Annual International Meeting. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 925–929. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2020‐3428359.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Xue, Y., Ma, J. and Chen, X. (2014) High‐order sparse Radon transform for AVO‐preserving data reconstruction. Geophysics, 79(2), V13–V22. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013‐0002.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Xue, Y.R., Chen, X.H. and Ma, J.T. (2012) Multiples attenuation based on directional orthogonal polynomial transform. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55, 3450–3458. https://doi.org/10.6038/j.issn.0001‐5733.2012.10.028.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Yin, P., Lou, Y., He, Q. and Xin, J. (2015) Minimization of l1–2 for compressed sensing. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 37, A536–A563. https://doi.org/10.1137/140952363.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, R. and Castagna, J. (2011) Seismic sparse‐layer reflectivity inversion using basis pursuit decomposition. Geophysics, 76(6), R147–R158. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011‐0103.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, T. (2010) Analysis of multi‐stage convex relaxation for sparse regularization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 1081–1107.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, Y. and Lu, W. (2014) 2D and 3D prestack seismic data regularization using an accelerated sparse time‐invariant Radon transform. Geophysics, 79(5), V165–V177. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013‐0286.1.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13185
Loading
3D high‐order sparse radon transform with L1–2 minimization for multiple attenuation
Geophysical Prospecting 70, 655 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13185
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13185
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13185
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D; Multiple attenuation; Radon; Seismic data processing

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error