1887
Volume 71 Number 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

A survey was conducted to investigate buried archaeological walls near the Ishtar temple in the ancient Babylon city using electrical resistivity tomography and ground‐penetrating radar methods. The survey includes applying 12 electrical resistivity tomography profiles using dipole–dipole array and a ground‐penetrating radar grid of 55 m × 50 m using 250 MHz antenna. Although the buried walls are consisting of mudbrick masonry and are embedded in a clayey environment, the electrical resistivity tomography method is still able to differentiate the tiny differences between the host materials and the buried walls, which show distinctive wall‐like features with resistivity values ranging between 9 and 15 Ω m. These features may reflect underground‐buried walls with a general width reaching about 2.5 m. The comparison of ground‐penetrating radar profiles and their corresponding electrical resistivity tomography profiles presents that the main architectures are coinciding well. The analysis of the geometry and composition of the walls around the Ishtar temple suggested that the wall‐like reflections on the ground‐penetrating radar slice at a depth between 140 and 150 cm (may be shallower) are underground‐buried walls. These wall‐like reflections show a special trend and orientation that indicate that they may be the remains of rooms belonging to two small houses or the remains of one big private house.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13293
2023-11-10
2025-06-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdulrazzaq, Z., Thabit, J. & Al‐Khafaji, A. (2021) Performance of GPR attribute analysis to detect and characterise buried archaeological targets near Ukhaidir palace, Vol 62, Iraq: Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al‐Hameedawi, M.M., Thabit, J.M., Al‐Menshed, F.H. & Conyers, L. (2021) Integrating electrical resistivity tomography and ground‐penetrating radar methods to map archaeological walls near northern Ishtar gate, ancient Babylon city. Iraq: Archaeological Prospection.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AL‐Hameedawi, M.M., Thabit, J.M. & AL‐Menshed, F.H. (2021) Some notes about three types of inhomogeneity and their effect on the electrical resistivity tomography data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 191, 104360.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Al‐Khersan, E.H., Al‐Ani, J.M. & Abrahem, S.N. (2016) Integrated GPR and ERT as enhanced detection for subsurface historical structures inside Babylonian houses site, Uruk City, Southern Iraq. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 173, 963–982.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Al‐Saadi, O.S., Schmidt, V., Becken, M. & Fritsch, T. (2018) Very‐high‐resolution electrical resistivity imaging of buried foundations of a Roman villa near Nonnweiler, Germany. Archaeological Prospection, 25, 209–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Al‐Suba'ai, A.A.M. (1985) Ishtar temple and the residential quarter west of the temple. Sumer, 41, 63–66. Arabic 101–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Angelis, D., Tsourlos, P., Tsokas, G., Vargemezis, G., Zacharopoulou, G. & Power, C. (2018) Combined application of GPR and ERT for the assessment of a wall structure at the Heptapyrgion Fortress (Thessaloniki, Greece). Journal of Applied Geophysics, 152, 208–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Balkaya, Ç., Kalyoncuoğlu, Ü.Y., Özhanlı, M., Merter, G., Çakmak, O. & Talih Guven, I. (2018) Ground‐penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography studies in the biblical Pisidian Antioch city, Southwest Anatolia. Archaeological Prospection, 25, 285–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Balkaya, Ç., Ekinci, Y.L., Çakmak, O., Blömer, M., Arnkens, J. & Kaya, M.A. (2021) A challenging archaeo‐geophysical exploration through GPR and ERT surveys on the Keber Tepe, City Hill of Doliche, Commagene (Gaziantep, SE Turkey). Journal of Applied Geophysics, 186, 104272.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Casas, A., Cosentino, P.L., Fiandaca, G., Himi, M., Macias, J.M., Martorana, R., Muñoz, A., Rivero, L., Sala, R. & Teixell, I. (2018) Non‐invasive geophysical surveys in search of the Roman Temple of Augustus under the Cathedral of Tarragona (Catalonia, Spain): a case study. Surveys in Geophysics, 39, 1107–1124.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahlin, T. & Zhou, B. (2004) A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 379–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fernández‐Álvarez, J.P., Rubio‐Melendi, D., Castillo, J.A.Q., González‐Quirós, A. & Cimadevilla‐Fuente, D. (2017) Combined GPR and ERT exploratory geophysical survey of the Medieval Village of Pancorbo Castle (Burgos, Spain). Journal of Applied Geophysics, 144, 86–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hegyi, A., Urdea, P., Floca, C., Ardelean, A. & Onaca, A. (2018) Mapping the subsurface structures of a lost medieval village in South‐Western Romania by combining conventional geophysical methods. Archaeological Prospection, 26, 21–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Klanica, R., Křivánek, R., Grison, H., Tábořík, P. & Šteffl, J. (2022) Capabilities and limitations of electrical resistivity tomography for mapping and surveying hillfort fortifications. Archaeological Prospection, 29, 401–416.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Loke, M.H. (2020) Tutorial: 2‐D and 3‐D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo Software. https://www.geotomosoft.com/downloads.php
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Malfitana, D., Leucci, G., Mazzaglia, A., Cacciaguerra, G., De Giorgi, L., Barone, S., Fragala, G., Pavone, P. & Russo, S. (2018) Archaeo‐geophysics surveys in Pompeii. Surveys in Geophysics, 39, 1219–1238.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nasir, M. (1979) The temple of Ishtar of Agade. Sumer, 35, 61–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Neal, A. (2004) Ground‐penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: principles, problems and progress. Earth‐Science Reviews, 66, 261–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pasierb, B. & Nawrocki, W. (2020) Not only the ‘Gold Train’ – the ‘Underground Town’ of Riese (Poland) – the ambiguity of interpretation ERT and GPR methods. Archaeological Prospection, 27, 361–375.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pedersén, O. (2021) Babylon: The Great City, Zaphon. Münster (www.zaphon.de).
  21. Scardozzi, G., Ismaelli, T., Leucci, G., De Giorgi, L., Ditaranto, I., Galli, M., Inglese, C. & Griffo, M. (2021) Ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography investigations in the southern sector of the Roman Forum: first results on the pre‐Augustan phases of the Basilica Julia. Archaeological Prospection, 28, 137–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Thabit, J.M., Al‐Banna, A.S. & Al‐Rahim, A.M. (2019) Mapping subsurface archaeological features using ground penetrating radar in the ancient city of Ur, Iraq. Archaeological Research in Asia, 17, 149–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhou, B. & Dahlin, T. (2003) Properties and effects of measurement errors on 2D resistivity imaging surveying. Near Surface Geophysics, 1(3), 105–117.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13293
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13293
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error