1887
Volume 71 Number 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Predicting the peak ground velocity of vibrations is essential to blast mining operations in order to design the charge weights so as not to exceed certain thresholds that prevent damage to buildings and other infrastructure. The problem is usually marred by a large scatter of observed peak ground velocity due to unknown complexities of seismic wave propagation. Classic peak ground velocity prediction methods employ empirical formulas, the most widespread being the scaled distance approach that has the least parameters to calibrate and works for a single sensor. In this study, we used data from 55 mining production blasts recorded by an array of 81 seismic sensors in an open pit iron ore mine in Austria. We evaluated and compared different methods for predicting peak ground velocity. The large data set provides sufficient constraint to independently resolve the charge weight exponent , the radial decay constant and local site factors. The /‐ratio of 0.2 that we find for our site is far smaller than that implied by the US Bureau of Mining scaled distance method, and peak ground velocity predictions made with the latter approach are significantly worse. This highlights the importance of using site‐specific data to calibrate predictive models and suggests that relying on arbitrary priors may lead to inaccurate predictions. For the charge weight exponent, we find a value of 0.5 which we interpret as expression of the physical relationship among charge weight, energy and amplitude, suggesting that this may be a global, site‐independent, value. This result has probable a broader relevance beyond our specific location and could improve prediction outcomes on other sites.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13361
2023-09-09
2025-11-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/71/7/gpr13361.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13361&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ambraseys, N.R. & Hendron, A.J. (1968) Dynamic behavior of rock masses. In: Stagg, K. G. & Zienkiewicz, O. C. (Eds.) Rock mechanics in engineering practice. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 203–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Duvall, W., Johnson, C., Meyer, A. & Devine, J. (1962) Vibrations from instantaneous and millisecond‐delayed quarry blasts. Washington, DC: US Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Langefors, U. & Kihlström, B. (1963) The modern technique of rock blasting. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Neubauer, F. (1994) Revised lithostratigraphy and structure of the Eastern Graywacke Zone (Eastern Alps). Mitteilung der Österreichischen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 86, 61–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Prochaska, W. (2012) Siderite and magnesite mineralizations in Palaeozoic strata of the Eastern Alps (Austria) field trip guide, 29th IAS meeting of sedimentology, Schladming, Austria. Journal of Alpine Geology, 54, 309–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Robertsson, J.O.A., Blanch, J.O. & Symes, W.W. (1994) Viscoelastic finite‐difference modeling. Geophysics, 59(9), 1444–1456.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Schulz, O., Vavtar, F. & Dieber, K. (1997) Die Siderit‐Erzlagerstätte Steirischer Erzberg: eine geowissenschaftliche Studie, mit wirtschaftlicher und geschichtlicher Betrachtung. Archiv Für Lagerstättenforschung der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 20, 65–178. (In German).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Schönlaub, H.P., Flajs, G. & Thalmann, F. (1980) Conodontenstratigraphie am Steirischen Erzberg (Nördliche Grauwackenzone). Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 123, 169–229. (In German).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sperl, G. (1984) Die Entwicklung des steirischen Eisenhüttenwesens vor der Einführung des Hochofens. In: Roth, P. W. (Ed.) Erz und Eisen in der Grünen Mark. Graz: Kulturreferat der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung, pp. 83–94. (In German).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tauchner, C., Reiner, F., Trabi, B., De la Puente, J. & Bleibinhaus, F. (2019) Seismic velocities from traveltime tomography at the iron ore mine Mt. Erzberg, Austria. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Band 21, 15195.
  11. Yilmaz, O. (2016) The comparison of most widely used ground vibration predictor equations and suggestions for the new attenuation formulas. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(3), 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13361
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13361
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attenuation; inversion; parameter estimation; seismics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error