1887
Volume 71 Number 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

The mine roadway built in the same thick rock stratum will not change the lithologic medium in front of the roadway under the influence of the small structure of the mine, which makes the mine radar face many difficulties in structural interpretation. In the coal measure strata in southwest China, the coal seam roof is the weak aquifer of the Kayitou () group. The mine structure is the excellent drainage boundary of an aquifer, resulting in the water content of the structural belt being different from that of the surrounding rock. This paper proposes a method to identify hidden structures in mine roadways using the autoregressive and moving average power spectrum energy enveloping medium water content inversion technique. Based on the actual water content of strata in the study area, 48 roadway models are constructed. The finite‐difference time‐domain algorithm was used to obtain the forward data and calculate the volumetric water content of the model. The structure of the roadway model is accurately identified by the water content difference. In the numerical simulation study, the segmentation frequency of high‐frequency and low‐frequency envelope of the autoregressive and moving average spectrum of 100‐MHz radar antenna is determined to be 155 MHz, and the value range of water content calculation regulation parameter is determined. The high‐ and low‐frequency envelope inversion characteristics of the autoregressive and moving average spectrum of different tunnel media models are summarized and analysed. To solve the calculation problem of energy envelope selection of autoregressive and moving average power spectrum of engineering data, the ‐nearest neighbour machine learning algorithm was used to learn and classify the power spectrum features of different tunnel models. The detection application is analysed through the whole‐rock medium and coal and rock medium roadway in the study area. The results show that the method can effectively identify the location and strike characteristics of the hidden structures in front of the roadway.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13364
2023-11-10
2025-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cui, F., Bao, J.C., Cao, Z.D., Li, L.P. & Zheng, Q. (2020) Soil hydraulic parameters estimation using ground‐penetrating radar data via ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124552
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cui, F., Wu, Z.Y., Wang, L. & Wu, Y.B. (2015) Application of the ground penetrating radar ARMA power spectrum estimation method to detect moisture content and compactness values in sandy loam. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 120, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.06.006
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Du, C., Yang, F., Xu, X.J., Xu, X.L. & Peng, M. (2014) Coal mine geological hazardous body detection using surface ground penetrating radar velocity tomography. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2014.6970441
  4. Ferrara, C., Barone, P.M., Steelman, C.M., Pettinelli, E. & Endres, A.L. (2012) Monitoring shallow soil water content under natural field conditions using the early‐time GPR signal technique. Vadose Zone, 12(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0202
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Friedlander, B. & Porat, B. (1984) A spectral matching technique for ARMA parameter estimation. ICASSP '83. IEEE International Conference on Acousitcs, Speech, and Signal Processing, Boston, MA, USA, 1084–1087. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1983.1171965
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Knoll, M.D., Knight, R. & Brown, E. (1995) Can accurate estimates of permeability be obtained from measurements of dielectric properties?Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 1995. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  7. Lee, Y.H., Wei, C.P., Cheng, T.H. & Yang, C.T. (2012) Nearest‐neighbor‐based approach to time‐series classification. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 207–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Y. (2009) Studies and applies on geology radar detection ARMA power spectrum identification algorithm for Roadbed frozen ground disease. Changsha, China: Central South University, pp. 12–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Z.H. (1997) Some new theories and approaches of ARMA series and its spectral estimation. Journal of Dalian Maritime University (in Chinese), 23(4), 93–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Liang, Q.H., Wu, Y.Q., Song, J., Huang, H., Zhu, C.H. & Sun, X.P. (2014) Experimental study on advanced detection in coal seam driving roadway by ground penetrating radar. Coal Science and Technology (in Chinese), 42(05), 91–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ling, J.Y., Qian, R.Y., Liu, D.Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Y.C. & Zhang, S.Q. (2022) Study on fine GPR detection technique of fan‐delta sedimentary structure in a complex environment. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 57(02), 478–486+250.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Matteo, A.D., Pettinelli, E. &Slob, E. (2013) Early‐time GPR signal attributes to estimate soil dielectric permittivity: a theoretical study. IEEE Transactions on Geoscinece and Remote Sensing, 51(3), 1643–1654.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Roth, K., Shulin, R., Flühler, H. &Attinger, W. (1990) Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content measurement using a composite dielectric approach. Water Resources Research, 26(10), 2267–2273. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i010p02267
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith, L. & Freeze, R.A. (1979) Stochastic analysis of steady‐state groundwater flow in a bounded domain 2. Two‐dimensional simulations. Water Resources Research, 15(6), 1543–1559. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR015i006p01543
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tess, X.H., Luo, W.W.L., Chang, R.K.W. & Goodman, D. (2019) GPR imaging criteria. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 165, 34–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Topp, G.C., Davis, J.L. & Anna, A.P. (1980) Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurement in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources, 16(3), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Taniar, D. & Rahayu, W. (2013) A taxonomy for nearest neighbour queries in spatial databases. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 79(7), 1017–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2013.01.017
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, K. & Li, D. (2018) Application of ground probing radar in geological prediction for underground coal mine. Coal Technology (in Chinese), 37(06), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2018.06.047
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, Q., Wang, M. & Wu, X. (2004) Investigations of groundwater bursting into coalmine seam floors from fault zones. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Minings Sciences, 41(4), 557–571.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu, Z.Y., Fan, C., Junli, N. & Tianxiang, X. (2022) Research on soil water content variation in coal mining area based on ground‐penetrating radar. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19, 5097–5108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03398-9
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang, J.S., Son, M.W., Chung, E.S. & Kim, I.H. (2015) Prioritizing feasible locations for permeable pavement using MODFLOW and multi‐criteria decision making methods. Water Resources Research, 29(12), 4539–4555.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yuan, J., Douzal‐Chouakria, A., Yazdi, S.V. & Wang, Z.H. (2019) A large margin time series nearest neighbour classification under locally weighted time warps. Knowledge and Information Systems, 59, 117–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, J. & Yang, T. (2018) Study of a roof water inrush prediction model in shallow seam mining based on an analytic hierarchy process using a grey relational analysis method. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11(7), 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3498-2
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, X.D. (1999) Modern signal processing. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, pp. 23–26.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13364
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13364
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error