1887
Volume 71, Issue 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Well mineralogy can be estimated from probabilistic, direct and machine learning models; however, all these models have limitations. The maximum number of components in probabilistic models is restricted to the number of logs plus one. Direct models require the precise composition of minerals. Machine learning models demand unbiased databases, a challenge as the samples are collected in reservoir intervals. These limitations impact the evaluation for the Santos Basin pre‐salt rocks due to the complexity of facies and magnesian clays. This work proposes creating a hybrid model through the combination of probabilistic and machine learning models. First, mineral fractions of calcite, dolomite, quartz, k‐feldspar, detrital clay, plagioclase and pyroxene are estimated by the algorithm XGBoost trained using rock samples. Then, a probabilistic model reconstructs the well logs and machine learning estimations through the seven minerals mentioned plus magnesian clays, pyrite, barite and fluids. The difference between the real and reconstructed responses is minimized, weighted by the curves’ uncertainties. The hybrid model is used to estimate the mineralogy of three wells drilled in the Santos Basin, honouring the mineralogy of the rock samples collected in these wells and improving the quantification of dolomite, pyroxene and magnesian clay. Among the advances introduced, the following stand out: The use of machine learning estimates and well logs improved the quantification of magnesian clay; the machine learning estimates regularized the probabilistic model, generating more coherent results; the uncertainties of the machine learning algorithms dealt with database bias. The hybrid model mitigated limitations related to database bias without the costs associated with collecting more samples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13378
2023-09-22
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, R.N., Dove, R.E., Broglia, C., Silver, L.T., James, E.W. & Chappell, B.W. (1988). Elemental and mineralogical analyses using geochemical logs from the Cajon Pass scientific drillhole, California, and their preliminary comparison with core analyses. Geophysical Research Letters, 15(9), 969–972.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anifowose, F.A., Labadin, J. & Abdulraheem, A. (2017) Hybrid intelligent systems in petroleum reservoir characterization and modeling: the journey so far and the challenges ahead. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 7(1), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202‐016‐0257‐3
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ardabili, S., Mosavi, A. & Várkonyi‐Kóczy, A.R. (2019) Advances in machine learning modeling reviewing hybrid and ensemble methods. In Preprints – artificial intelligence & robotics (Issue August). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201908.0203.v1
  4. Bageri, B.S., Adebayo, A.R., Barri, A., Al Jaberi, J., Patil, S., Hussaini, S.R. & Babu, RS. (2019) Evaluation of secondary formation damage caused by the interaction of chelated barite with formation rocks during filter cake removal. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 183(March), 106395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106395
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Branch, M.A., Coleman, TF. & Li, Y. (1999) A subspace, interior, and conjugate gradient method for large‐scale bound‐constrained minimization problems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 21(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827595289108
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: 22nd KDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. pp. 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
  7. Ciliak, N. (2021) Standard deviation. Quantitative Reasoning. http://matcmath.org/textbooks/quantitativereasoning/standard‐deviation/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Clavier, C., Coates, G. & Dumanoir, J. (1984) Theoretical and experimental bases for the dual‐water model for interpretation of shaly sands. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.2118/6859‐PA
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Collett, T.S., Lewis, R.E., Winters, W.J., Lee, M.W., Rose, K.K. & Boswell, R.M. (2011) Downhole well log and core montages from the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 28(2), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.03.016
    [Google Scholar]
  10. de Oliveira, L.A.B., Custódio, L.F.N., Fagundes, T.B., Ulsen, C. & de Carvalho Carneiro, C. (2021) Stepped machine learning for the development of mineral models: concepts and applications in the pre‐salt reservoir carbonate rocks. Energy and AI, 3, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100050
    [Google Scholar]
  11. de Oliveira, L.A.B. & de Carvalho Carneiro, C. (2021) Synthetic geochemical well logs generation using ensemble machine learning technics for the Brazilian pre‐salt reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 196, 108080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108080
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Denney, D. (2010) Integrating core data and wireline geochemical data for formation evaluation and characterization of shale gas reservoir. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. p. 63. https://doi.org/10.2118/0811‐0062‐jpt
  13. El‐Bagoury, M. (2020) Integrated petrophysical study to validate water saturation from well logs in Bahariya Shaley Sand Reservoirs, case study from Abu Gharadig Basin, Egypt. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10(8), 3139–3155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202‐020‐00969‐3
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, D.V. & Singer, J.M. (2007) Well logging for earth scientists, 2nd edition. Dordrecht: Springer, p. 692.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Flaum, C. & Pirie, G. (1981) Determination of lithology from induced gamma ray spectroscopy. In: SPWLA 23nd annual logging symposium. p. 16.
  16. Franquet, J.A., Bratovich, M.W. & Glass, R.D. (2012) State‐of‐the‐art openhole shale gas logging. In: Society of petroleum engineers SPE Saudi Arabia section technical symposium and exhibition 2012, April. pp. 663–674. https://doi.org/10.2118/160862‐ms
  17. Freedman, R., Herron, S., Anand, V., Herron, M., May, D. & Rose, D. (2015) New method for determining mineralogy and matrix properties from elemental chemistry measured by gamma ray spectroscopy logging tools. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 18(04), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.2118/170722‐pa
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Garcia, A.P., Jagadisan, A., Rostami, A. & Heidari, Z. (2017) A new resistivity‐based model for improved hydrocarbon saturation assessment in clay‐rich formations using quantitative clay network geometry and reck fabric. In: SPWLA 58th annual logging symposium. p. 16.
  19. Gomes, J.P., Bunevich, R.B., Tedeschi, L.R., Tucker, M.E. & Whitaker, F.F. (2020) Facies classification and patterns of lacustrine carbonate deposition of the Barra Velha Formation, Santos Basin, Brazilian Pre‐salt. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 113, 104176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104176
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gonzalez, J., Lewis, R., Hemingway, J., Grau, J., Rylander, E. & Schmitt, R. (2013) Determination of formation organic carbon content using a new neutron‐induced gamma ray spectroscopy service that directly measures carbon. In: SPWLA 54th annual logging symposium. p. 15. https://doi.org/10.1190/urtec2013‐112
  21. Hamada, G.M. & Al‐Awad, M.N.J. (2000) Petrophysical evaluation of low resistivity sandstone reservoirs. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 39(7), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.2118/00‐07‐N
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamada, G.M., Al‐Awad, M.N.J. & Almalik, M.S. (2001) Log evaluation of low‐resistivity sandstone reservoirs. In: Society of petroleum engineers SPE Permian basin oil and gas recovery conference. p. 10. https://doi.org/10.2118/70040‐ms
  23. Herlinger, R., do Nascimento Freitas, G., Dos Anjos, C.D.W., Petróleo Brasileiro, S.A. & De Ros, L.F. (2020) Petrological and petrophysical implications of magnesian clays in Brazilian pre‐salt deposits. In: SPWLA 61st annual logging symposium. https://doi.org/10.30632/SPWLA‐5004
  24. Herron, MM. (1986) Mineralogy from geochemical well logging. Clays and Clay Minerals, 34(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1346/ccmn.1986.0340211
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Herron, S., Herron, M., Pirie, I., Saldungaray, P., Craddock, P., Charsky, A., Polyakov, M., Shray, F. & Li, T. (2014) Application and quality control of core data for the development and validation of elemental spectroscopy log interpretation. In: SPWLA 55th annual logging symposium. p. 23.
  26. Herron, S.L. & Herron, M.M. (1996) Quantitative lithology: an application for open and cased hole spectroscopy. In: SPWLA 37th annual logging symposium. p. 14.
  27. Hertzog, R., Colson, L., Seeman, B., O'brien, M., Scott, H., Mckeon, D., Wraight, P., Grau, J., Ellis, D., Schweitzer, J. & Herron, M. (1989) Geochemical logging with spectrometry tools. SPE Formation Evaluation, 4(02), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.2118/16792‐pa
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ibrahim, AF., Al‐Mujalhem, MQ., Nasr‐El‐Din, HA. & Al‐Bagoury, M. (2020) Evaluation of formation damage of oil‐based drilling fluids weighted with micronized ilmenite or micronized barite. SPE Drilling and Completion, 35(3), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.2118/200482‐PA
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ibrahim, D.S., Sami, N.A. & Balasubramanian, N. (2017) Effect of barite and gas oil drilling fluid additives on the reservoir rock characteristics. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 7(1), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202‐016‐0258‐2
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jin, X., Zhu, D., Hill, A.D. & Mcduff, DR. (2019) Effects of heterogeneity in mineralogy distribution on acid fracturing efficiency. In: Society of petroleum engineers – hydraulic fracturing technology conference and exhibition. pp. 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2118/194377‐pa
  31. Mineralogy Database . (2021). https://www.webmineral.com/ [Accessed December 18 2021].
  32. Mitchell, W.K. & Nelson, R.J. (1988) A practical approach to statistical log analysis. In: SPWLA 29th annual logging symposium. pp. 1–20.
  33. Moreira, J.L.P., Valdetaro, C., Gil, J.A. & Machado, M.A.P. (2007) Bacia de Santos. Boletim de Geociencias Da Petrobras, 15(2), 531–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. North, R.J. (1987) Through‐casing reservoir evaluation using gamma ray spectroscopy. In: SPE California regional meeting. pp. 329–342.
  35. Pemper, R. (2020) A history of nuclear spectroscopy in well logging. Petrophysics, 61(6), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv61n6‐2020a1
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Poupon, A. & Leveaux, J. (1971) Evaluation of water saturation in shaly formations. The Log Analyst, 12(4), 3–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pratama, E., Suhaili Ismail, M. & Ridha, S. (2017) An integrated workflow to characterize and evaluate low resistivity pay and its phenomenon in a sandstone reservoir. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 14(3), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742‐2140/aa5efb
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Radtke, R., Lorente, M., Adolph, B., Berheide, M., Fricke, S., Grau, J., Herron, S., Horkowitz, J., Jorion, B., Madio, D., May, D., Miles, J., Perkins, L., Philip, O., Roscoe, B., Rose, D. & Stoller, C. (2012) A new capture and inelastic spectroscopy tool takes geochemical logging to the next level. In: SPWLA 53rd annual logging symposium. p. 16.
  39. Schlumberger . (2015) Schlumberger wireline services catalog. Schlumberger.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Silva Junior, G. (2019) Caracterização de argilominerais expansíveis em rochas reservatório por relaxometria. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102‐33061996000200018
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Silva, Y.M.P., Neumann, R., Ramnani, C.W. & Ávila, C.A. (2020) Digital mineralogy: advances in pre‐salt rocks characterization using automated mineralogical mapping of petrographic thin sections by SEM. In: Rio oil & gas expo and conference 2020. p. 13.
  42. Stadtmuller, M., Lis‐Śledziona, A. & Słota‐Valim, M. (2018) Petrophysical and geomechanical analysis of the Lower Paleozoic shale formation, North Poland. Interpretation, 6(3), SH91–SH106. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT‐2017‐0193.1
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Straley, C., Rossini, D., Vinegar, H., Tutunjian, P. & Morriss, C. (1997) Core analysis by low‐field NMR. Log Analyst, 38(2), 84–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ulloa, J.M., Chaparro, D., Lara, S., Arango, S., Mendez, F., Alarcon, N. & Gade, S. (2016) An innovative cased‐hole, oil‐saturation method of utilizing excess carbon analysis of pulsed neutron measurements in a siliciclastic Cenozoic formation, Los Llanos Basin, Colombia. In: SPWLA 57th annual logging symposium. p. 12.
  45. Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., et al. (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐019‐0686‐2
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Waxman, M.H. & Smits, L.J.M. (1968) Electrical conductivities in oil‐bearing shaly sands. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 8(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.2118/1863‐A
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Westaway, P., Hertzog, R. & Plasek, RE. (1983) Neutron‐induced gamma ray spectroscopy for reservoir analysis. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 23(03), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.2118/9461‐pa
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao, J., Chen, H., Yin, Lu & Li, N. (2017) Mineral inversion for element capture spectroscopy logging based on optimization theory. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 14(6), 1430–1436. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742‐2140/aa7bfa
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13378
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13378
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): borehole geophysics; logging; modelling; petrophysics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error