1887
Volume 71, Issue 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Acquiring seismic data with multichannel, multiple‐streamer and even multi‐componentsystems at sea provides excellent images of the Earth. However, the cost and complexity of operations prevent their use in busy areas such as ports or in sensitive environments such as lagoons. In the latter cases, mono‐channel Chirp or Boomer systems are the most viable instruments for marine surveys. The lack of multiple offsets prevents the use of standard tools for amplitude‐versus‐offset and velocity analysis, which are necessary for the lithological characterization of rocks, especially for the shallow sediments in offshore engineering. In this paper, we present a few recent techniques that exploit the traveltime and amplitude of multiple reflections to compensate for the offset limitation, including a new algorithm for the joint tomographic inversion of direct arrivals, primaries and multiples. We have developed a cost‐effective workflow for mono‐channel surveys based on a data‐driven, physically consistent philosophy that attempts to approximately extract lithological parameters, such as P velocity, anelastic absorption, acoustic impedance and even density. We applied the proposed workflow to a real field experiment and obtained a semi‐quantitative estimate for shallow sediments that can be used by offshore engineers.

© 2023 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2023 The Authors. Geophysical Prospecting published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13389
2023-09-22
2025-12-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13389
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/71/8/gpr13389.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13389&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ackroyd, M.H. (1970) Instantaneous spectra and instantaneous frequency. Proceedings IEEE, 58, 141. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1970.7552.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkhalifah, T.A. (2014). Full waveform inversion in an anisotropic world. Education tour series. The Netherlands, Houten: EAGE, pp. 197. ISBN 9789462822023.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alkhalifah, T.A., Almomin, A. & Naamani, A. (2021) Machine‐driven earth exploration: artificial Intelligence in oil and gas. The Leading Edge, 40, 234–312. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle40040298.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alves, D.P.V. & Mahiques, M.M. (2019) Deposition and sea‐level evolution models for Upper Pleistocene/Holocene in the São Sebastião Channel (SE Brazilian coast) inferred from 5th order seismic stratigraphy. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 93, 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2019.05.012.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakulin, A., Neklyudov, D. & Silvestrov, I. (2022) Multiplicative random seismic noise caused by small‐scale near‐surface scattering and its transformation during stacking. Geophysics, 87, V419–V435. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2021‐0830.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baradello, L. (2014) An improved processing sequence for uncorrelated Chirp sonar data. Marine Geophysical Research, 35, 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001‐014‐9220‐1.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barsottelli‐Botelho, M.A. & Mesquita, L. (2015) Using GPR and high frequency seismic to locate under water buried pipes. In: Near surface geoscience conference. pp. We21P104. (Extended abstracts). EAGE, Bunnik, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.201413812
  8. Biondi, B.L. (2006) 3D seismic imaging (pp. 247). Tulsa, USA: SEG. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801689.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bull, J.M., Quinn, R. & Dix, J.K. (1998) Reflection coefficient calculation from marine high resolution seismic reflection (Chirp) data and application to an archaeological case study. Marine Geophysical Research, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004373106696.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Busetti, M., Babich, A. & Del Ben, A. (2020) Geophysical evidence of fluids emission in the Gulf of Trieste (North Adriatic Sea). Memorie Descrittive della Carta Geologica d'Italia, 105, 11–16, ISPRA (Rome, Italy).
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Busetti, M., Volpi, V., Nicolich, R., Barison, E., Romeo, R., Baradello, L. et al. (2010) Dinaric tectonic features in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic). Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 51(2–3), 117–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Busetti, M., Zgur, F., Vrabec, M., Facchin, L., Pelos, C., Romeo, R. et al. (2013) Neotectonic reactivation of Meso‐Cenozoic structures in the Gulf of Trieste and its relationship with fluid seepings. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Gruppo Nazionale di Geofisica della Terra Solida (GNGTS) Congress. pp. 29–34.
  13. Carcione, J.M. & Poletto, F. (2000) Sound velocity of drilling mud saturated with reservoir gas. Geophysics, 65, 646–651. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444761.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cevatoglu, M., Bull, J.M., Vardy, M.E., Gernon, T.M., Wright, I.C. & Long, D. (2015) Gas migration pathways, controlling mechanisms and changes in sediment acoustic properties observed in a controlled sub‐seabed CO2 release experiment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 38, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.005.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chapman, R.P. & Scott, H.D. (1964) Surface backscattering strengths measured over an extended range of frequencies and grazing angles. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36(9), 1735. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1919274.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, J., Hu, G., Bu, Q., Wu, N., Liu, C., Chen, Q. et al. (2023) Elastic wave velocity of marine sediments with free gas: insights from CT‐acoustic observations and theoretical analysis. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 150, 106169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106169.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Claerbout, J. (1985) Imaging the Earth's interior. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 233–234.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen, J.K. & Stockwell, J.W., Jr. (2013) CWP/SU: Seismic Un*x release 43R5, an open‐source software package for seismic research and processing. Golden, CO, USA: Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines. http://timna.mines.edu/cwpcodes/.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Conti, A., Stefanon, A. & Zuppi, G.M. (2002) Gas seeps and rock formation in the northern Adriatic Sea. Continental Shelf Research, 22, 2333–2344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278‐4343(02)00059‐6
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Crocker, S.E. & Fratantonio, F.D. (2016) Characteristics of sounds emitted during high‐resolution geophysical surveys. (NUWC‐NPT Technical Report 12203, Newport, USA). pp. 266. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1007504.pdf.
  21. Denich, E., Vesnaver, A. & Baradello, L. (2021) Amplitude recovery and deconvolution of Chirp and Boomer data for marine geology and offshore engineering. Energies, 14, 5704. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185704.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. de Oliveira Santos, I. & Landim Dominguez, J.M. (2019) Mapeamento estratigráfico utilizando sísmica de alta resolução no trecho da futura Ponte Salvador‐Itaparica, Bahia, Brasil. Geologia USP, Série Cientifica, 19(4), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316‐9095.v19‐150500.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Duchesne, M.J. & Bellefleur, G. (2007) Processing of single‐channel, high‐resolution seismic data collected in the St. Lawrence estuary, Quebec. Calgary, Canada: Geological Survey of Canada. Current Research, 2007‐D1, pp. 11. https://doi.org/10.4095/223483
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dusart, J., Tarits, P., Fabre, M., Marsset, B., Jouet, G., Erhold, A. et al. (2022) Characterization of gas‐bearing sediments in coastal environment using geophysical and geotechnical data. Near Surface Geophysics, 20, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12230.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fomel, S. (2009) Adaptive multiple subtraction using regularized nonstationary regression. Geophysics, 74, V25–V33. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3043447.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fomel, S., Landa, E. & Taner, M.T. (2007) Post‐stack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics, 72, 1ND–Z100, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2781533.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gazdag, J. (1978) Wave equation migration with the phase‐shift method. Geophysics, 43, 1342–1351. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440899.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Geletti, R., Del Ben, A., Busetti, M., Ramella, R. & Volpi, V. (2008) Gas seeps linked to salt structures in the Central Adriatic Sea. Basin Research, 20, 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2117.2008.00373.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Gordini, E., Falace, A., Kaleb, S., Donda, F., Marocco, R. & Tunis, G. (2012) Methane‐related carbonate cementation of marine sediments and related macroalgal coralligenous assemblages in the Northern Adriatic Sea. In: Harris, P. T. & Baker, E. K. (Eds.) Seafloor geomorphology as benthic habitats. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 183–198. ISBN 978‐0‐12‐385140‐6.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Gordon, J., Gillespie, D., Potter, J., Frantzis, A., Simmonds, M.P., Swift, R. et al. (2003) A review of the effects of seismic surveys on marine mammals. Marine Technological Society Journal, 37, 16–34. https://doi.org/10.4031/002533203787536998.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Goswami, B.K., Weitemeyer, K.A., Minshull, T.A., Sinha, M.C., Westbrook, G.K. & Marín‐Moreno, H. (2016) Resistivity image beneath an area of active methane seeps in the west Svalbard continental slope. Geophysical Supplements to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 207(2), 1286–1302. https://doi/org/10.1093/gji/ggw330.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Gutowski, M., Bull, J.M., Henstock, T.J., Dix, J.K., Hogarth, P., Leighton, T.G. et al. (2002) Chirp sub‐bottom profiler source signature design and field testing. Marine Geophysical Research, 23, 481–492. https://resource.isvr.soton.ac.uk/staff/pubs/PubPDFs/Pub2555.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Helle, H.B., Pham, N.H. & Carcione, J.M. (2003) Velocity and attenuation in partially saturated rocks: poroelastic numerical experiments. Geophysical Prospecting, 51, 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365‐2478.2003.00393.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Hite, D. & Fontana, P.M. (2007) Wide azimuth streamer acquisition: from field development to exploration applications, and back again. In: 10th international congress SBGF. pp. 869–873. (Expanded abstracts). SEG (Houston, USA). https://doi.org/10.1190/sbgf2007‐169.
  35. Hovland, M. & Curzi, P. (1989) Gas seepage and assumed mud diapirism in the Italian central Adriatic Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 6, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264‐8172(89)90019‐6.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang, Y., Abubakar, A., Colombo, D., Gao, K., Kim, J.‐H., Mantovani, M. et al. (2018) Introduction to special section: multiphysics imaging for exploration and reservoir monitoring. Interpretation, 6, SGi–SGii. https://doi.org/10.1190/int‐2018‐0713‐spseintro.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim, G.Y., Narantsetseg, B., Kim, J.W. & Chun, J.H. (2014) Physical properties and micro‐and macro‐structures of gassy sediments in the inner shelf of SE Korea. Quaternary International, 344, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.01.049.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Landais, M., Mensch, T., Grenie’, D. & Wombell, R. (2014) Broadband wide‐azimuth towed streamer acquisition in West Africa. In: 84th SEG annual meeting. pp. 138–142. (Expanded abstracts). SEG (Houston, USA). https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2014‐0511.1.
  39. Lin, L.F., Hsu, H.H., Liu, C.S., Chao, K.H., Ko, C.C., Chiu, S.D. et al. (2019) Marine 3D seismic volumes from 2D seismic survey with large streamer feathering. Marine Geophysical Research, 40, 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001‐019‐09391‐9.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin, R., Vesnaver, A., Böhm, G. & Carcione, J.M. (2018) Broad‐band viscoacoustic Q‐factor imaging by seismic tomography and instantaneous frequency. Geophysical Journal International, 214, 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy168.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lin, R., Vesnaver, A., Böhm, G. & Carcione, J.M. (2022) Erratum of the paper: “broad‐band viscoacoustic Q‐factor imaging by seismic tomography and instantaneous frequency”. Geophysical Journal International, 229, 898–899. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab526.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Mackenzie, K.V. (1981) Nine‐term equation for sound speed in the oceans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.386920.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Maine, H. (1962) Common reflection point horizontal data stacking techniques. Geophysics, 27, 753–1027. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439118.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mao, L. & Stewart, R.R. (2017) Near‐surface imaging of the shallow sediments of Galveston Bay, Texas. In: SEG annual meeting. pp. 5958–5962. (Expanded abstracts). SEG (Houston, USA).https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017‐17794435.1.
  45. McGee, T.M. (1995) High‐resolution marine reflection profiling for engineering and environmental purposes. Part A: Acquiring analogue seismic signals. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926‐9851(95)90047‐0.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Millero, F.J., C.T., Bradshaw, A. & Schleicher, K. (1980) A new high‐pressure equation of state for seawater, Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 27, 255–264. ISSN 0198‐0149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198‐0149(80)90016‐3.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Moldoveanu, N., Nesladek, N. & Vigh, D. (2020) Wide‐azimuth towed‐streamer and large‐scale OBN acquisition: a combined solution. In: 90th SEG annual meeting. pp. 16–21. (Expanded abstracts). SEG (Houston, USA). https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2020‐3425439.1.
  48. Müller, C., Milkereit, B., Bohlen, T. & Theilen, F. (2002) Towards high‐resolution 3D marine seismic surveying using Boomer sources. Geophysical Prospecting, 50, 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365‐2478.2002.00335.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Müller, C., Woelz, S., Ersoy, Y., Boyce, J., Jokisch, T., Wendt, G. et al. (2009) Ultra‐high‐resolution 2D‐3D seismic investigation of the Liman Tepe/Karantina Island archeological site (Urla/Turkey). Journal of Applied Geophysics, 68, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.10.015.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Peacock, K.L. & Treitel, S. (1969) Predictive deconvolution theory and practice. Geophysics, 34, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440003.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Pecholcs, P.I., Lafon, S.K., Al‐Ghamdi, T., Al‐Shammery, H., Kelamis, P., Huo, S.X. et al. (2010) Over 40,000 vibration points per day with real‐time quality control: opportunities and challenges. In: SEG annual meeting. pp. 111–115. (Expanded abstracts). SEG (Houston, USA). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3513041.
  52. Pecholcs, P.I., Al‐Saad, R., Al‐Sannaa, M., Quingley, J., Bagaini, C., Zarkidze, A. et al. (2012) A broadband full‐azimuth seismic study from Saudi Arabia using a 100,000 channel recording system at 6 terabytes per day: acquisition and processing lessons learned. In: SEG annual meeting. pp. 1–5. (Expanded abstracts). SEG (Houston, USA). https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012‐0438.1.
  53. Pinson, L.J.W., Henstock, T.J., Dix, J.K. & Bull, J.M. (2008) Estimating quality factor and mean grain size of sediments from high‐resolution marine seismic data. Geophysics, 73, G19–G28. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2937171
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Plessix, R.E. (2008) Introduction: towards a full‐waveform inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 56, 761–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2478.2008.00736.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Riedel, M. & Theilen, F. (2001) AVO investigations of shallow marine sediments. Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365‐2478.2001.00246.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Rietsch, E. (2015) SeisLab 3.02. Release 15.09.21. Natick, MA, USA: MathWorks©. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/53109‐seislab‐3‐02
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Robinson, E.A. & Treitel, S. (1967) Principles of digital Wiener filtering. Geophysical Prospecting, 15, 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2478.1967.tb01793.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Ruppel, C.D., Weber, T.C., Staaterman, E.R., Labak, S.J. & Hart, P.E. (2022) Categorizing active marine acoustic sources based on their potential to affect marine mammals. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10, 1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10091278.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Russell, B., Hampson, D. & Chun, J. (1990) Noise elimination and the Radon transform. Part 1. The Leading Edge, 9(10), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439677.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Saha, J.G. (1987) Relationship between Fourier and instantaneous frequency. In: SEG annual meeting. pp. 591–594. (Expanded abstracts). SEG (Houston, USA). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1892041.
  61. Schock, S.G. & LeBlanc, L.R. (1990) Chirp Sonar: new technology for sub‐bottom profiling. Sea Technology, 31(9), 35–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Sills, G.C. & Wheeler, S.J. (1992) The significance of gas for offshore operations. Continental Shelf Research, 12(10), 1239–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278‐4343(92)90083‐V.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Stockwell, J.W., Jr. (1999) The CWP/SU: Seismic Un*x package. Computers & Geosciences, 25, 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098‐3004(98)00145‐9.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Sultan, N., Voisset, M., Marsset, T., Vernant, A.M., Cauquil, E., Colliat, J.L. et al. (2007) Detection of free gas and gas hydrate based on 3D seismic data and cone penetration testing: an example from the Nigerian Continental Slope. Marine Geology, 240(1–4), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2007.02.012.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Taner, M.T. & Koehler, F. (1969) Velocity spectra – digital computer derivation application of velocity functions. Geophysics, 34, 821–1041, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440058.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Taner, M.T., Koehler, F. & Sheriff, R.E. (1979) Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics, 44, 1041–1063, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440994.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Trobec, A., Busetti, M., Zgur, F., Baradello, L., Babich, A., Cova, A. et al. (2018)Thickness of marine Holocene sediment in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea). Earth Science Data System, 10, 1077–1092. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd‐10‐1077‐2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Uge, M.A. & Alp, H. (2018) The comparison between two methods for Chirp seismic data processing. In: EAGE annual meeting, Tu3ASM02. (Extended abstracts). EAGE, Bunnik, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.201802669
  69. van der Sluis, A. & van der Vorst, H.A. (1987) Numerical solution of large, sparse linear systems arising from tomographic problems. In: Nolet, G. (Ed.) Seismic tomography. Hingham MA, USA: Reidel, pp. 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐94‐009‐3899‐1_3.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Verbeek, N.H. & McGee, T.M. (1995) Characteristics of high‐resolution marine reflection profiling sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33(4), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926‐9851(95)90045‐4.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Verschuur, D.J., Berkhout, A.J. & Wapenaar, C.P.A. (1992) Adaptive surface‐related multiple attenuation. Geophysics, 57, 1166–1177. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443330.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Vesnaver, A. (1994) Towards the uniqueness of tomographic inversion solutions. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 3, 323–334.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Vesnaver, A. (2017) Instantaneous frequency and phase without unwrapping. Geophysics, 82, F1–F7. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016‐0185.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Vesnaver, A., Accaino, F., Böhm, G., Madrussani, G., Pajchel, J., Rossi, G. et al. (2003) Time‐lapse tomography. Geophysics, 68, 815–823. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1581034.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Vesnaver, A. & Baradello, L. (2022a) Shallow velocity estimation by multiples for monochannel Boomer surveys. Applied Sciences, 12, 3046. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063046.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Vesnaver, A. & Baradello, L. (2022b) Shallow velocities estimation by multiples in Boomer surveys. In: 83rd EAGE annual meeting. (Expanded abstracts). EAGE, Bunnik, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.202210195.
  77. Vesnaver, A. & Baradello, L. (2022c) Tomographic joint inversion of direct arrivals, primaries and multiples for monochannel marine surveys, Geosciences, 12(6), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12060219.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Vesnaver, A., Busetti, M. & Baradello, L. (2021) Chirp data processing for fluid flow detection at the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea). Bulletin of Geophysics and Oceanography, 62, 365–386. https://doi.org/10.4430/bgo00361.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Wiggins, W. (1988) Attenuation of complex water‐bottom multiples by wave‐equation‐based prediction and subtraction. Geophysics, 53, 1527–1539. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442434.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Yilmaz, O. (2001) Seismic data analysis. Tulsa, USA: SEG, pp. 2065. ISBN: 978‐1‐56080‐094‐1 (print), 978‐1‐56080‐158‐0 (online).
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Zecchin, M., Baradello, L., Brancolini, G., Donda, F., Rizzetto, F. & Tosi, L. (2008) Sequence stratigraphy based on high‐resolution seismic profiles in the late Pleistocene and Holocene deposits of the Venice area. Marine Geology, 253, 3–4, 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2008.05.010.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13389
Loading
A workflow for processing mono‐channel Chirp and Boomer surveys
Geophysical Prospecting 71, 1387 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13389
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13389
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13389
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acquisition; inversion; seismics; signal processing; tomography

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error