1887
Volume 71, Issue 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Shales are rocks with a complex structure. Shales contain high clay content, which constitutes a load‐bearing skeleton. In this study, we present a novel rock physics model to obtain elastic stiffness coefficients of both clays and shales. The robustness of the model is then verified by a field dataset from Eagle Ford shale. We utilize the extended Maxwell homogenization scheme as a rock physics model for transversely isotropic media, which honours the aspect ratio of each inhomogeneity embedded in an effective inclusion domain. Estimated anisotropy parameters ε, γ and δ, on average, are 0.19, 0.29 and 0.04, respectively, based on our modelling results in Eagle Ford shale. Anisotropic modelling results exhibit a good correlation with dipole sonic logs. Both dipole sonic log analysis and rock physics results demonstrate that clay content is the main driver of anisotropy in the field, and there is a direct relationship between clay volume and anisotropy parameters of ε and γ. The method shown here can be readily applied to other unconventional reservoirs.

© 2023 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2023 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13397
2023-09-22
2026-02-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13397
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexandrov, K.S. & Ryzhova, T. (1961) The elastic properties of rock‐forming minerals. II: Layered silicates. Bulletin USSR Academy of Science, Geophysics Series, 12, 1165–1168.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkhalifah, T. & Tsvankin, I. (1995) Velocity analysis for transversely isotropic media. Geophysics, 60(5), 1550–1566.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandyopadhyay, K. (2009) Seismic anisotropy: Geological causes and its implications to reservoir geophysics. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barton, C.D. & Karathanasis, A.D. (2002) Clay minerals. In: Encyclopedia of Soil Science. NY, USA: CRC Press, pp. 187–192.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Batzle, M. & Wang, Z. (1992) Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics, 57(11), 1396–1408.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayuk, I.O., Ammerman, M. & Chesnokov, E.M. (2007) Elastic moduli of anisotropic clay. Geophysics, 72(5), D107–D117.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Berge, P.A. & Berryman, J.G. (1995) Realizability of negative pore compressibility in poroelastic composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 62(4), 1053–1062.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Berryman, J.G. & Berge, P.A. (1996) Critique of two explicit schemes for estimating elastic properties of multiphase composites. Mechanics of Materials, 22(2), 149–164.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bratton, T.R. (2018) Stress induced changes in elastic wave attributes in the Wattenberg Field, Colorado, USA. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado School of Mines.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Castberg, R.C. (2014) Impact of electric fields on the alignment of clay particles. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Centurion, S.M., Cade, R. & Luo, X.L. (2012) Eagle Ford Shale: Hydraulic fracturing, completion, and production trends: Part II. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, volume 7. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp. 2925–2939.
  12. Cheng, P., Perz, M., Ogunsuyi, O., Meng, F., Li, X., Keller, W. & Kriechbaum, V. (2017) Chasing anisotropy in the Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford Shale formations: Azimuthal‐processing challenges and considerations. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, number 2009. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 458–462.
  13. Close, D., Cho, D., Horn, F. & Edmundson, H. (2009) The sound of sonic: a historical perspective and introduction to acoustic logging. CSEG Recorder, 34(5), 34–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Craddock, P., Lewis, R., Miles, J. & Pomerantz, A. (2019) Thermal maturity‐adjusted log interpretation (TMALI) in organic shale. In SPWLA 60th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions. Houston, TX: Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts, pp. 1–19.
  15. Gherabati, S.A., Browning, J., Male, F., Ikonnikova, S.A. & McDaid, G. (2016) The impact of pressure and fluid property variation on well performance of liquid‐rich Eagle Ford shale. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 33, 1056–1068.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hashin, Z. & Shtrikman, S. (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 11(2), 127–140.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hill, R. (1963) Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 11(5), 357–372.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill, R. (1965) A self‐consistent mechanics of composite materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 13(4), 213–222.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Holt, R.M. & Kolstø, M.I. (2017) How does water near clay mineral surfaces influence the rock physics of shales?Geophysical Prospecting, 65(6), 1615–1629.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hornby, B.E., Schwartz, L.M. & Hudson, J.A. (1994) Anisotropic effective‐medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales. Geophysics, 59(10), 1570–1583.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones, L. E.A. & Wang, H.F. (1981) Ultrasonic velocities in Cretaceous shales from the Williston basin. Geophysics, 46(3), 288–297.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Katahara, K.W. (1996) Clay mineral elastic properties. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1996. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 1691–1694.
  23. Keller, W., Mott, R., Jumper, A., Lynn, H., Lynn, W. & Perz, M. (2017) Correlation of azimuthal velocity anisotropy and seismic inversion attributes to Austin Chalk production: a south central Texas case study. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017 . Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 3992–3996.
  24. Kuster, G.T. & Toksöz, M.N. (1974) Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two‐phase media, part I. theocratical formulations. Geophysics, 39(5), 587–606.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. & Dvorkin, J. (2009) The rock physics handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Maxwell, J.C. (1873) A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Militzer, B., Wenk, H.‐R., Stackhouse, S. & Stixrude, L. (2011) First‐principles calculation of the elastic moduli of sheet silicates and their application to shale anisotropy. American Mineralogist, 96(1), 125–137.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Mokhtari, M., Honarpour, M.M., Tutuncu, A.N. & Boitnott, G.N. (2016) Characterization of elastic anisotropy in Eagle Ford Shale: impact of heterogeneity and measurement scale. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 19(03), 429–439.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Norris, A.N. & Sinha, B.K. (1993) Weak elastic anisotropy and the tube wave. Geophysics, 58(8), 1091–1098.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Nye, J.F. (1985) Physical properties of crystals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ortega, J.A., Ulm, F.‐J. & Abousleiman, Y. (2007) The effect of the nanogranular nature of shale on their poroelastic behavior. Acta Geotechnica, 2(3), 155–182.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Prammer, M.G., Drack, E.D., Bouton, J.C., Gardner, J.S., Coates, G.R., Chandler, R.N. & Miller, M.N. (1996) Measurements of clay‐bound water and total porosity by magnetic resonance logging. In Society of Petroleum Engineers ‐ SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, volume 37. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp. 311–320.
  33. Reuss, A. (1929) Berechnung der Fließgrenze von Mischkristallen auf Grund der Plastizitätsbedingung für Einkristalle. ZAMM ‐ Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 9(1), 49–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Saxena, V., Krief, M. & Adam, L. (2018) Handbook of borehole acoustics and rock physics for reservoir characterization. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sayers, C. (2005) Seismic anisotropy of shales. Geophysical Prospecting, 53(5), 667–676.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Sayers, C.M. & Dasgupta, S. (2019) A predictive anisotropic rock‐physics model for estimating elastic rock properties of unconventional shale reservoirs. Leading Edge, 38(5), 358–365.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sayers, C.M. & den Boer, L.D. (2018) The elastic properties of clay in shales. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(7), 5965–5974.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sayers, C.M., Guo, S. & Silva, J. (2015) Sensitivity of the elastic anisotropy and seismic reflection amplitude of the Eagle Ford Shale to the presence of kerogen. Geophysical Prospecting, 63(1), 151–165.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Sevostianov, I. (2014) On the shape of effective inclusion in the Maxwell homogenization scheme for anisotropic elastic composites. Mechanics of Materials, 75, 45–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Sevostianov, I. (2017) Maxwell homogenization scheme in micromechanics: an overview. MATEC Web of Conferences, 132, 03017.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sevostianov, I. & Giraud, A. (2013) Generalization of Maxwell homogenization scheme for elastic material containing inhomogeneities of diverse shape. International Journal of Engineering Science, 64, 23–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sevostianov, I. & Kachanov, M. (2002) Explicit cross‐property correlations for anisotropic two‐phase composite materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 50(2), 253–282.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sevostianov, I. & Kachanov, M. (2014) On some controversial issues in effective field approaches to the problem of the overall elastic properties. Mechanics of Materials, 69(1), 93–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sevostianov, I., Yilmaz, N., Kushch, V. & Levin, V. (2005) Effective elastic properties of matrix composites with transversely‐isotropic phases. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42(2), 455–476.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sone, H. & Zoback, M.D. (2013) Mechanical properties of shale‐gas reservoir rocks, Part 1: static and dynamic elastic properties and anisotropy. Geophysics, 78(5), D381–D392.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Stoneley, R. (1924) Elastic waves at the surface of separation of two solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 106(738), 416–428.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomsen, L. (1986) Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics, 51(10), 1954–1966.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tsvankin, I., Gaiser, J., Grechka, V., van der Baan, M. & Thomsen, L. (2010) Seismic anisotropy in exploration and reservoir characterization: an overview. Geophysics, 75(5), 75A15–75A29.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Vanorio, T., Prasad, M. & Nur, A. (2003) Elastic properties of dry clay mineral aggregates, suspensions and sandstones. Geophysical Journal International, 155(1), 319–326.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Vilchevskaya, E. & Sevostianov, I. (2015) Effective elastic properties of a particulate composite with transversely‐isotropic matrix. International Journal of Engineering Science, 94, 139–149.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Voigt, W. (1910) Lehrbuch der Krystallphysik: (mit Ausschluss derKrystalloptik). Leipzig, Germany: BG Teubner‐Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang, Z.Z., Wang, H. & Cates, M.E. (2001) Effective elastic properties of solid clays. Geophysics, 66(2), 428–440.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, F., Zhang, T. & Li, X.Y. (2019) Seismic amplitude inversion for the transversely isotropic media with verticalaxis of symmetry. Geophysical Prospecting, 67, 2368–2385.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13397
Loading
A rock physics model in vertical transverse isotropy media and its application to Eagle Ford shale
Geophysical Prospecting 71, 1633 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13397
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13397
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13397
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anisotropy; clay; rock physics; shale; unconventional

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error