1887
Volume 72, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Unconsolidated sandstones are attractive targets for underground storage of carbon due to their high porosity and permeability. Monitoring of injection and movement of CO in such formations using elastic waves requires an understanding of the acoustic properties of the sandstone. Current approaches often use the so‐called soft‐sand model in which a Hertz–Mindlin model of the acoustic properties at high porosity is mixed with the acoustic properties of the mineral phase to predict the acoustic properties over the entire porosity range. Using well‐log data from two unconsolidated sand formations of interest for CO storage, we discuss the limitations of this model and provide an alternative approach in which the mechanical properties of grain contacts are obtained by inversion, and the properties of infill material lying within the pore space are estimated. The formations considered are the Paluxy Formation in Kemper County, Mississippi, and the Frio Formation near Houston, Texas. The ratio of the normal to shear compliance of the grain contacts is found to be significantly less than unity for both formations. This implies that the grain contacts are more compliant in shear than in compression. However, the grain contact compliance is higher and the ratio of the normal to shear compliance is lower for the Frio example than for the Paluxy case, and this may lead to sliding at grain contacts with low shear compliance and transport of grains during fluid flow, particularly if CO acts to weaken any cement that may be present at the grain contacts. Such transport was suggested by Al Hosni et al. in explaining why the magnitude of the time‐lapse effect due to the injection of CO at the Frio CO injection site is greater than predicted using conventional rock physics models. A simple model of the mechanical properties of infill material lying within the pore space suggests that the bulk and shear moduli of infill material in the Paluxy case are significantly higher than the Frio case, consistent with the lower grain contact compliance in the Paluxy case.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13438
2024-01-30
2025-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al Hosni, M., Vialle, S., Gurevich, B. & Daley, T.M. (2016) Estimation of rock frame weakening using time‐lapse crosswell: the Frio brine pilot project. Geophysics, 81(6), B235–B245.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Avseth, P., Dvorkin, J., Mavko, G. & Rykkje, J. (2000) Rock physics diagnostic of North Sea sands: link between microstructure and seismic properties. Geophysical Research Letters, 27(17), 2761–2764.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G. & Dvorkin, J. (2010) Rock‐physics diagnostics of depositional texture, diagenetic alterations, and reservoir heterogeneity in high‐porosity siliciclastic sediments and rocks—a review of selected models and suggested work flows. Geophysics, 75(5), 75A31–75A47.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Avseth, P., Skjei, N. & Mavko, G. (2016) Rock‐physics modeling of stress sensitivity and 4D time shifts in patchy cemented sandstones—application to the Visund Field, North Sea. The Leading Edge, 35(10), 868–878.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bachrach, R. & Avseth, P. (2008) Rock physics modeling of unconsolidated sands: accounting for nonuniform contacts and heterogeneous stress fields in the effective media approximation with applications to hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics, 73(6), E197–E209.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bachrach, R., Dvorkin, J. & Nur, A.M. (2000) Seismic velocities and Poisson's ratio of shallow unconsolidated sands. Geophysics, 65(2), 559–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Batzle, M. & Wang, Z. (1992) Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics, 57(11), 1396–1408.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Berryman, J.G. (1995) Mixture theories for rock properties. In: Ahrens, T.J. (Ed.) Rock physics and phase relations: a handbook of physical constants, vol. 3. Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union, pp. 205–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boucher, S. (1974) On the effective moduli of isotropic two‐phase elastic composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 8(1), 82–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, J.M. (2015) Determination of Hashin–Shtrikman bounds on the isotropic effective elastic moduli of polycrystals of any symmetry. Computers & Geosciences, 80, 95–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, R.J. & Korringa, J. (1975) On the dependence of the elastic properties of a porous rock on the compressibility of the pore fluid. Geophysics, 40(4), 608–616.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Budiansky, B. & O'Connell, R.J. (1976) Elastic moduli of a cracked solid. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 12(2), 81–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Carmichael, R.S. (1989) Practical handbook of physical properties of rocks and minerals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, F., Sevostianov, I., Giraud, A. & Grgic, D. (2015) Evaluation of the effective elastic and conductive properties of a material containing concave pores. International Journal of Engineering Science, 97, 60–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ciz, R. & Shapiro, S.A. (2007) Generalization of Gassmann equations for porous media saturated with a solid material. Geophysics, 72(6), A75–A79.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Daley, T.M., Myer, L.R., Peterson, J.E., Majer, E.L. & Hoversten, G.M. (2008) Time‐lapse crosswell seismic and VSP monitoring of injected CO2 in a brine aquifer. Environmental Geology, 54, 1657–1665.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Digby, P.J. (1981) The effective elastic moduli of porous granular rocks. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 48(4), 803–808.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dvorkin, J., Mavko, G. & Nur, A. (1991) The effect of cementation on the elastic properties of granular material. Mechanics of Materials, 12(3–4), 207–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dvorkin, J. & Nur, A. (1996) Elasticity of high‐porosity sandstones: theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics, 61, 1363–1370.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eshelby, J.D. (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 241(1226), 376–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Eshelby, J.D. (1961) Elastic inclusions and inhomogeneities. In: Sneddon, I.N. & Hill, R. (Eds.) Progress in solid mechanics, vol. 2. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, pp. 89–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Florez‐Nino, J.M. (2005) Integrating geology, rock physics, and seismology for reservoir‐quality prediction. (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford: Stanford University.
  23. Gassmann, F. (1951) Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, 96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Han, D.H. (1986) Effects of porosity and clay content on acoustic properties of sandstones and unconsolidated sediments (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford: Stanford University.
  25. Han, D.H., Nur, A. & Morgan, D. (1986) Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones. Geophysics, 51(11), 2093–2107.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hashin, Z. & Shtrikman, S. (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 11, 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hertz, H. (1882) Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1882, 156–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hovorka, S.D., Romero, M.L., Warne, A.G., Ambrose, W.A., Tremblay, T.A., Treviño, R.H. et al. (2000) Sequestration of greenhouse gases in brine formations. Austin: The University of Texas, Bureau of Economic Geology.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hovorka, S.D., Holtz, M.H., Sakurai, S., Knox, P.R., Collins, D., Papadeas, P. et al. (2003) Frio pilot in CO2 sequestration in brine‐bearing sandstones. Austin: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hovorka, S.D., Benson, S.M., Doughty, C., Freifeld, B.M., Sakurai, S., Daley, T.M. et al. (2006) Measuring permanence of CO2 storage in saline formations: the Frio experiment. Environmental Geosciences, 13(2), 105–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Johnson, D.L., Makse, H.A., Gland, N. & Schwartz, L. (2000) Nonlinear elasticity of granular media. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 279(1–3), 134–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson, D.L., Schwartz, L.M., Elata, D., Berryman, J.G., Hornby, B. & Norris, A.N. (1998) Linear and nonlinear elasticity of granular media: stress‐induced anisotropy of a random sphere pack. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 65(2), 380–388.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kachanov, M. (1992) Effective elastic properties of cracked solids: critical review of some basic concepts. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 45, 304–335.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Koperna, G., Riestenberg, D., Leierzapf, J., Roth, B., Esposito, R. & Sams Gray, K. (2023) Building an EPA class VI permit application. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 26, 1032–1047.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Koperna, G. (2020) Numerical modeling report (Deliverable 8.1. a). Peachtree Corners, GA: Southern States Energy Board. No. DOE‐SSEB‐0029465‐56.
  36. Makse, H.A., Gland, N., Johnson, D.L. & Schwartz, L. (2004) Granular packings: nonlinear elasticity, sound propagation, and collective relaxation dynamics. Physical Review E, 70(6), 061302.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. & Dvorkin, J. (2020) The rock physics handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Maxwell, J.C. (1873) A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mindlin, R.D. (1949) Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 16, 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mindlin, R.D. & Deresiewicz, H. (1953) Elastic spheres in contact under varying oblique forces. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 75, 327–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Murphy, W.F. (1982) Effects of microstructure and pore fluids on granular sedimentary materials (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford: Stanford University.
  42. Murphy, W.F., Schwartz, L.M. & Hornby, B. (1991) Interpretation physics of Vp and Vs in sedimentary rocks. In: SPWLA 32nd Annual Logging Symp. Houston, TX, Society of Petrophysicists and Well‐Log Analysts, pp. 1–16.
  43. Norris, A.N. (1985) A differential scheme for the effective moduli of composites. Mechanics of Materials, 4(1), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Norris, A.N. & Johnson, D.L. (1997) Nonlinear elasticity of granular media. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 64(1), 39.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Nur, A., Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J. & Galmudi, D. (1998) Critical porosity: a key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks. The Leading Edge, 17(3), 357–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. O'Connell, R.J. & Budiansky, B. (1974) Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids. Journal of Geophysical Research, 79(35), 5412–5426.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sakurai, S., Ramakrishnan, T.S., Boyd, A., Mueller, N. & Hovorka, S. (2006) Monitoring saturation changes for CO2 sequestration: petrophysical support of the Frio brine pilot experiment. Petrophysics, 47(06).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Saul, M. & Lumley, D. (2015) The combined effects of pressure and cementation on 4D seismic data. Geophysics, 80(2), WA135–WA148.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Saul, M., Lumley, D. & Shragge, J. (2013) Modeling the pressure sensitivity of uncemented sediments using a modified grain contact theory: incorporating grain relaxation and porosity effects. Geophysics, 78(5), D327–D338.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sayers, C.M. (2021a) Mechanical properties of grain contacts in unconsolidated sands. Geophysics, 86(2), MR95–MR103.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sayers, C.M. (2021b) Contribution of crystal orientation and grain boundary compliance to low shear velocity observed near base of polar ice sheets. Geophysical Journal International, 227(3), 1554–1566.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sayers, C.M. (2023) The effect of clay and contacts between sand grains on the elastic properties of sandstones. Geophysical Prospecting, 71(3), 456–470.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sayers, C.M. & den Boer, L.D. (2021) Porosity variation of elastic wave velocities in clean sandstones. Geophysical Prospecting, 69, 1733–1744.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sayers, C.M. & Han, D.H. (2002) The effect of pore fluid on the stress dependent elastic wave velocities in sandstones. In: 72nd Annual International Meeting (Expanded Abstracts). Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 1842–1845.
  55. Sayers, C.M. & Kachanov, M. (1995) Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 4149–4156.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Schoenberg, M. (1980) Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 1516–1521.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sevostianov, I. & Giraud, A. (2013) Generalization of Maxwell homogenization scheme for elastic material containing inhomogeneities of diverse shape. International Journal of Engineering Science, 64, 23–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Sevostianov, I., Mogilevskaya, S.G. & Kushch, V.I. (2019) Maxwell's methodology of estimating effective properties: alive and well. International Journal of Engineering Science, 140, 35–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Urban, S. (2020) Geologic characterization of cretaceous sandstone at the Kemper County energy facility, Mississippi: a world‐class site for CO2 storage (Master's dissertation). Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.
  60. Vernik, L. (2016) Seismic petrophysics in quantitative interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 121–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Walton, K. (1987) The effective elastic moduli of a random packing of spheres. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 35(2), 213–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wethington, C., Pashin, J., Wethington, J., Esposito, R. & Riestenberg, D. (2022) Mudstone baffles and barriers in lower cretaceous strata at a proposed CO2 storage hub in Kemper County, Mississippi, United States. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 904850.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Yu, J., Duffaut, K. & Avseth, P. (2023) Stress sensitivity of elastic moduli in high‐porosity cemented sandstone—heuristic models and experimental data. Geophysics, 88(4), MR185–MR194.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang, H.P. & Makse, H.A. (2005) Jamming transition in emulsions and granular materials. Physical Review E, 72(1), 011301.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Zimmer, M.A. (2004) Seismic velocities in unconsolidated sands: measurements of pressure, sorting, and compaction effects (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford: Stanford University.
  66. Zimmer, M.A., Prasad, M., Mavko, G. & Nur, A. (2007a) Seismic velocities of unconsolidated sands: Part 1—Pressure trends from 0.1 to 20 MPa. Geophysics, 72(1), E1–E13.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Zimmer, M.A., Prasad, M., Mavko, G. & Nur, A. (2007b) Seismic velocities of unconsolidated sands: Part 2—Influence of sorting‐and compaction‐induced porosity variation. Geophysics, 72(1), E15–E25.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13438
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13438
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): elastic; reservoir geophysics; rock physics; sand reservoir; sandstone

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error