1887
Volume 72, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

The presence of sets of vertical, parallel fractures is very common in the Earth's upper crust. Notably, open fractures exert critical control on the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the host formation. There is great interest in understanding how fractures interact with seismic waves, as this knowledge could be used to detect and characterize fractures from seismic data. When a seismic wave travels through a fractured formation, it induces oscillatory fluid pressure diffusion between the fractures and the embedding porous background, a physical process that produces attenuation and dispersion of the seismic wave. Although there are numerous studies on this topic, the case of parallel fractures saturated with different immiscible fluids, such as brine and CO, remains rather unexplored. With these motivations, in this work, we propose an analytical approach to compute the phase velocity and attenuation of P‐waves travelling perpendicularly to a set of planar, parallel fractures. While we consider that the background is saturated with brine, the fractures can be saturated with brine or gas. Our numerical analysis shows for the first time that two manifestations of fluid pressure diffusion arise in these cases. One of them, associated with relatively high levels of attenuation, is due to fluid pressure diffusion occurring between consecutive fractures saturated with different fluids. In this case, the fluid pressure diffusion process is initiated at a fracture saturated with brine and reaches a consecutive fracture saturated with gas. The other fluid pressure diffusion manifestation, on the other hand, arises at higher frequencies, is characterized by lower levels of attenuation and results from the interaction in the background of fluid pressure diffusion processes initiated at consecutive fractures, irrespective of the fluid content. Finally, by considering a stochastic distribution of the two fluids and a classical frequency of interest in seismic experiments, we obtain P‐wave attenuation and phase velocity as functions of the fracture gas saturation. This approach could be of interest for the remote detection and quantification of pore fluids using seismic waves.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13444
2024-02-21
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barbosa, N.D., Rubino, J.G., Caspari, E. & Holliger, K. (2018) Impact of fracture clustering on the seismic signatures of porous rocks. Geophysics, 83, MR295–MR308.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biot, M.A. (1941) General theory of three‐dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics, 12, 155–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biot, M.A. (1962) Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. Journal of Applied Physics, 33, 1482–1498.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourbié, T., Coussy, O. & Zinzner, B. (1987) Acoustic of porous media. Editions Technip, Paris, France: Institut francais du pétrole.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brajanovski, M., Müller, T.M. & Gurevich, B. (2006) Characteristic frequencies of seismic attenuation due to wave‐induced fluid flow in fractured porous media. Geophysical Journal International, 166, 574–578.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brajanovski, M., Müller, T.M. & Parra, J.O. (2010) A model for strong attenuation and dispersion of seismic P‐waves in a partially saturated fractured reservoir. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 53, 1383–1387.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carcione, J. & Picotti, S. (2006) P‐wave seismic attenuation by slow‐wave diffusion: effects of inhomogeneous rock properties. Geophysics, 71, O1–O8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Caspari, E., Milani, M., Rubino, J.G., Müller, T.M., Quintal, B. & Holliger, K. (2016) Numerical upscaling of frequency‐dependent P‐ and S‐wave moduli in fractured porous media. Geophysical Prospecting, 64, 1166–1179.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chapman, M. (2009) Modeling the effect of multiple sets of mesoscale fractures in porous rocks on frequency‐dependent anisotropy. Geophysics, 74, D97–D103.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo, J., Rubino, J.G., Glubokovskikh, S. & Gurevich, B. (2017) Effects of fracture intersections on seismic. Geophysical Prospecting, 65, 1264–1276.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gurevich, B., Brajanovski, M., Galvin, R.J., Müller, T.M. & Toms‐Stewart, J. (2009) P‐wave dispersion and attenuation in fractured and porous reservoirs ‐ poroelasticity approach. Geophysical Prospecting, 57, 225–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. He, Y., Rubino, J.G., Solazzi, S.G., Barbosa, N.D., Favino, M., Chen, T., Gao, J. & Holliger, K. (2022) Effects of fracture intersections on seismic dispersion: theoretical predictions versus numerical simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(6), e2021JB023473.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kong, L., Gurevich, B., Müller, T.M., Wang, Y. & Yang, H. (2013) Effect of fracture fill on seismic attenuation and dispersion in fractured porous rocks. Geophysical Journal International, 195, 1679–1688.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Krzikalla, F. & Müller, T.M. (2011) Anisotropic P‐SV‐wave dispersion and attenuation due to inter‐layer flow in thinly layered porous rocks. Geophysics, 76, WA135–WA145.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, E., Hudson, J.A. & Pointer, T. (2000) Equivalent medium representation of fractured rock. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 2981–3000.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, E. & Martinez, A. (2012) Seismic fracture characterization: Concepts and practical applications. Houten, the Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Maultzsch, S., Chapman, M., Liu, E. & Li, X.Y. (2003) Modelling frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy in fluid‐saturated rock with aligned fractures: implication of fracture size estimation from anisotropic measurements. Geophysical Prospecting, 51, 381–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rubino, J.G., Caspari, E., Müller, T.M. & Holliger, K. (2017) Fracture connectivity can reduce the velocity anisotropy of seismic waves. Geophysical Journal International, 210, 223–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rubino, J.G., Guarracino, L., Müller, T.M. & Holliger, K. (2013) Do seismic waves sense fracture connectivity?Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 692–696.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rubino, J.G., Monachesi, L.B., Müller, T.M., Guarracino, L. & Holliger, K. (2013) Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion due to wave‐induced fluid flow in rocks with strong permeability fluctuations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 4742–4751.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rubino, J.G., Müller, T.M., Guarracino, L., Milani, M. & Holliger, K. (2014) Seismoacoustic signatures of fracture connectivity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 119, 2252–2271.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rubino, J.G., Ravazzoli, C.L. & Santos, J.E. (2009) Equivalent viscoelastic solids for heterogeneous fluid‐saturated porous rocks. Geophysics, 74, N1–N13.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schoenberg, M. & Sayers, C.M. (1995) Seismic anisotropy of fractured rock. Geophysics, 60, 204–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Slough, K.J., Sudicky, E.A. & Forsyth, P.A. (1999) Importance of rock matrix entry pressure on DNAPL migration in fractured geologic materials. Groundwater, 37(2), 237–244.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Solazzi, S.G., Hunziker, J., Caspari, E., Rubino, J.G., Favino, M. & Holliger, K. (2020) Seismic signatures of fractured porous rocks: the partially‐saturated case. Journal of Geophysical Research, 125, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Solazzi, S.G., Rubino, J.G., Müller, T.M., Milani, M., Guarracino, L. & Holliger, K. (2016) An energy‐based approach to estimate seismic attenuation due to wave‐induced fluid flow in heterogeneous poroelastic media. Geophysical Journal International, 207, 823–832.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13444
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13444
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acoustics; numerical study; rock physics; siesmics; wave

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error