1887
Volume 72, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Because of their relatively shallow volume of investigation, borehole acoustic measurements can be affected by abnormal near‐wellbore conditions such as irregular calliper, drilling‐induced formation damage and mud‐filtrate invasion, among others. Additionally, borehole‐slowness measurements inherently deliver rock elastic properties spatially averaged across the length of the multi‐receiver array included in the waveform acquisition system. The consequence is that the interpretation of borehole acoustic measurements needs to account for both radial variations of elastic properties and axial spatial averaging effects across thinly laminated formations before conducting seismic‐well log ties and rock physics interpretations. We introduce an inversion‐based interpretation method to estimate radial shear‐slowness variations from frequency‐dependent slownesses in vertical wells penetrating horizontally layered formations. The inversion procedure is efficiently implemented with an optimized two‐dimensional fast‐forward‐modelling method that simulates borehole acoustic modes in the presence of invaded and thinly laminated formations. Furthermore, the inversion method consists of two sequential steps: Firstly, layer‐by‐layer dispersion slownesses are processed to mitigate axial spatial averaging effects on borehole acoustic measurements; secondly, radial variations of elastic properties are estimated from inversion results obtained from the first step. The new inversion‐based interpretation workflow estimates a layer‐by‐layer single‐radial‐step shear slowness model, including altered and virgin radial zones. By considering both radial and axial averaging effects, the implementation of the two‐step inversion‐based interpretation method in thinly laminated and radially invaded formations consistently improves the definition of shear slowness between invaded and virgin radial zones compared to traditional radial‐profiling methods. The accuracy of the estimated shear slowness heavily relies on the sensitivity of dispersion modes to radial variations in formation shear slowness.

© 2024 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2023 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13471
2024-05-21
2025-11-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13471
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archie, G.E. (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the AIME, 146(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.2118/942054‐G
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aster, R., Borchers, B. & Thurber, C. (2005) Parameter estimation and inverse problems. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Backus, G. & Gilbert, F. (1970) Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 266(1173), 123–192. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1970.0005
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Braunisch, H., Habashy, T.M., Sinha, B.K. & Pabon, J. (2000) Inversion of borehole dispersions for formation elastic moduli. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.922609
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Braunisch, H., Habashy, T.M., Sinha, B.K., Pabon, J. & Kong, J.A. (2004) Inversion of guided‐wave dispersion data with application to borehole acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(1), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1625683
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Burridge, R. & Sinha, B.K. (1996) Inversion for formation shear modulus and radial depth of investigation using borehole flexural waves. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts, 1996. SEG International Exposition and 66th Annual Meeting, November 10–15, 1996, Denver, CO. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1826426
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, S.K., Liu, H.L. & Johnson, D.L. (1987) Low‐frequency tube waves in permeable rocks. Geophysics, 53(4), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442483
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chi, S., Torres‐Verdin, C., Wu, J. & Alpak, F.O. (2006) Assessment of mud‐filtrate‐invasion effects on borehole acoustic logs and radial profiling of formation elastic properties. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 9(5), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.2118/90159‐PA
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Civan, F. (2015) Reservoir formation damage. Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao, G., Abubakar, A. & Habashy, T.M. (2013) Borehole petrophysical imaging using induction and acoustic measurements. Petrophysics, 54(04), 383–394.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gassmann, F. (1951) Uber die Elastizität Poroser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 96, 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gnirk, P.F. (1972) The mechanical behavior of uncased wellbores situated in elastic/plastic media under hydrostatic stress. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 12(01), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.2118/3224‐PA
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Heliot, D., Tabanou, J.R. & Goswami, J.C. (2005) System and method for analyzing a thin bed formation. U.S. Patent 6,963,803.
  14. Huang, S. (2015) Fast forward modeling and inversion of borehole sonic measurements using spatial sensitivity functions. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, S. & Torres‐Verdín, C. (2016) Inversion‐based interpretation of borehole sonic measurements using semianalytical spatial sensitivity functions. Geophysics, 81(2), D111–D124. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015‐0335.1
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, S., Matusyzyk, P.J. & Torres‐Verdín, C. (2015) Spatial sensitivity functions for rapid numerical simulation of borehole sonic measurements in vertical wells. Geophysics, 80(5), D459–D480. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014‐0587.1
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, S., Yang, Q., Matuszyk, P.J. & Torres‐Verdín, C. (2013) High‐resolution interpretation of sonic logging measurements using stochastic inversion with spatial slowness sensitivity functions. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2013. SEG's International Exposition and 83rd Annual Meeting, September 22–27, 2013, Houston, TX. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 524–528. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013‐0462.1
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kinoshita, T., Dumont, A., Hori, H., Sakiyama, N., Morley, J. & Garcia‐Osuna, F. (2010) LWD sonic tool design for high‐quality logs. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2010. SEG's 80th Annual International Meeting. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3513831
  19. Lei, T., Zeroug, S., Bose, S., Prioul, R. & Donald, A. (2019) Inversion of high‐resolution high‐quality sonic compressional and shear logs for unconventional reservoirs. Petrophysics, 60(6), 697–711. https://doi.org/10.30632/PJV60N6‐2019a1
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, J.C., He, X., Zhao, A.S & Jiang, C. (2023) Joint inversion of formation radial shear‐velocity profiles by dipole acoustic logging while drilling. Geophysics, 88(4), D295–D305. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022‐0426.1
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Maalouf, E. & Torres‐Verdín, C. (2018a) Inversion‐based method to mitigate noise in borehole sonic logs. Geophysics, 83(2), D61–D71. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017‐0334.1
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Maalouf, E. & Torres‐Verdín, C. (2018b) Interpretation of borehole sonic measurements acquired in vertical transversely isotropic formations penetrated by vertical wells. Geophysics, 83(6), D187–D202. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017‐0757.1
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mallan, R., Ma, J., Torres‐Verdin, C. & Wang, G.L. (2009) Joint radial inversion of resistivity and sonic logs to estimate in situ petrophysical and elastic properties of formations. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/124624‐MS
  24. Mavko, G.T., Mukerji, T. & Dvorkin, J. (2020) The rock physics handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Paillet, F.L. & Cheng, A. (1991) Acoustic waves in boreholes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Peyret, A. & Torres‐Verdín, C. (2006) Assessment of shoulder‐bed, invasion, and lamination effects on borehole sonic log: a numerical sensitivity study. Paper presented at the SPWLA 47th Annual Logging Symposium.
  27. Sams, M.S. (1995) Attention and anisotropy: the effect of extra fine layering. Geophysics, 60(6), 1646–1655. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443897
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Scheibner, D., Yoneshima, S., Zhang, Z., Izuhara, W., Wada, Y., Wu, P., Pampuri, F. & Pelorosso, M. (2010) Slow formation shear from an LWD tool: quadrupole inversion with a Gulf of Mexico example. Paper presented at the SPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium.
  29. Schmitt, D.P. (1988) Shear‐wave logging in elastic formations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(6), 2215–2229. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397015
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Shetty, S., Liang, L., Simoes, V., Canesin, F., Boyd, A., Zeroug, S., Sinha, B., Habashy, T., Domingues, A.B., Amorim, C. & Abbots, F. (2017) Imaging near‐wellbore petrophysical properties by joint inversion of sonic, resistivity, and density logging data. Petrophysics, 58(5), 501–516.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Sinha, B.K. (1997) Sensitivity and inversion of borehole flexural dispersions for formation parameters. Geophysical Journal International, 128(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1997.tb04073.x
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Sinha, B.K. (2021) Elastic properties of thin laminates using borehole‐guided mode dispersions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3114085
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Sinha, B.K., Vissapragada, B., Renlie, L. & Tysse, S. (2006) Radial profiling of the three formation shear moduli and its application to well completions. Geophysics, 71(6), E65–E77. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2335879
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Sinha, B.K., Simsek, E. & Asvadurov, S. (2009) Influence of a pipe tool on borehole modes. Geophysics, 74(3), E111–E123. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3085644
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sinha, B.K., Kane, M.R. & Frignet, B. (2000) Dipole dispersion crossover and sonic logs in a limestone reservoir. Geophysics, 65(2), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444734
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Su, Y.D., Tang, X.M., Zhuang, C.X., Xu, S. & Zhao, L. (2013) Mapping formation shear‐velocity variation by inverting logging‐while‐drilling quadrupole‐wave dispersion data. Geophysics, 78(6), D491–D498. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013‐0136.1
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang, X.M. (1996) Processing dipole waveform logs for formation alteration identification, In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1996. SEG's 66th Annual International Meeting. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 162–165. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1826437
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Tang, X.M. & Cheng, A. (2004) Quantitative borehole acoustic methods. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Tang, X.M. & Patterson, D.J. (2010) Mapping formation radial shear‐wave velocity variation by a constrained inversion of borehole flexural‐wave dispersion data. Geophysics, 75(6), E183–E190. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3502664
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Thomsen, L. (1986) Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics, 51(10), 1954–1966. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442051
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, G.L., Torres‐Verdín, C., Ma, J. & Odumosu, T.B. (2007) Combined inversion of borehole resistivity and sonic measurements to estimate water saturation, porosity and dry‐rock elastic moduli in the presence of invasion. Paper presented at the SPWLA 48th Annual Logging Symposium.
  42. Wu, J., Torres‐Verdin, C., Sepehrnoori, K. & Delshad, M. (2004) Numerical simulation of mud‐filtrate invasion in deviated wells. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 7(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.2118/87919‐PA
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu, S., Tang, X.M., Su, Y.D., Lee, S.Q. & Zhuang, C.X. (2017) Determining formation S‐wave transverse isotropy from borehole flexural‐wave dispersion data. Geophysics, 82(2), D47–D55. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016‐0223.1
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang, J., Sinha, B.K. & Habashy, T.M. (2012) A theoretical study on formation shear radial profiling in well‐bonded cased boreholes using sonic dispersion data based on a parameterized perturbation model. Geophysics, 77(3), WA197–WA210. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011‐0279.1
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang, J., Sinha, B.K., Valero, H.P., Bose, S. & Habashy, T.M. (2011) Estimation of the formation shear and borehole fluid slownesses using sonic dispersion data in the presence of a drill collar. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2011. SEG International Exposition and 81st Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Vol. 30, 464–468. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3628123
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, Z., Mochida, M., Kubota, M., Yamamoto, H., Scheibner, D. & Endo, T. (2012) Robust estimation of shear slowness from quadrupole mode in LWD environment. Paper presented at the SPWLA 18th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan.
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13471
Loading
Radial profiling of shear slowness from borehole acoustic measurements acquired in thinly laminated formations
Geophysical Prospecting 72, 1877 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13471
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13471
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13471
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 2D inversion; borehole geophysics; fine‐layered media; sonic log

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error