Regularization of vertical derivatives of potential field data using Morozov's discrepancy principle

References

1. Alvandi, A., Toktay, H.D. & Ardestani, V.E. (2023) Edge detection of geological structures based on a logistic function: a case study for gravity data of the Western Carpathians. International Journal of Mining and Geo‐Engineering, 57(3), 267–274.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baniamerian, J., Liu, S. & Abbas, M.A. (2018) Stable computation of the vertical gradient of potential field data based on incorporating the smoothing filters. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175(8), 2785–2806.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bezák, V., Bielik, M., Marko, F., Zahorec, P., Pašteka, R., Vozar, J. & Papčo, J. (2023) Geological and tectonic interpretation of the new Bouguer gravity anomaly map of Slovakia. Geologica Carpathica, 74(2), 109–122.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biely, A., Bezák, V., Elečko, M., Kaličiak, M., Konečný, V. & Lexa, J. (1996) Geological map of Slovakia, simplified version, Scale 1:500 000. State Geological Institute Dionýza Štúra, Bratislava, Slovakia.
5. Blakely, R.J. (1996) Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blakely, R.J., Sherrod, B.L., Hughes, J.F., Anderson, M.L., Wells, R.E., & Weaver, C.S. (2009) Saddle Mountain fault deformation zone, Olympic Peninsula, Washington: Western boundary of the Seattle uplift. Geosphere, 5(2), 105–125.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Davis, K., Li, Y. & Nabighian, M.N. (2011) Effects of low‐pass filtering on the calculated structural index from magnetic data. Geophysics, 76(4), L23–L28.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dean, W.C. (1958) Frequency analysis for gravity and magnetic interpretation. Geophysics, 23(1), 97–127.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Farquharson, C.G. & Oldenburg, D.W. (2004) A comparison of automatic techniques for estimating the regularization parameter in non‐linear inverse problems. Geophysical Journal International, 156(3), 411–425.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fedi, M. & Florio, G. (2001) Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method. Geophysical Prospecting, 49(1), 40–58.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fedi, M. & Florio, G. (2002) A stable downward continuation by using the ISVD method. Geophysical Journal International, 151(1), 146–156.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fedi, M. & Pilkington, M. (2012) Understanding imaging methods for potential field data. Geophysics, 77(1), G13–G24.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Florio, G., Fedi, M. & Pašteka, R. (2006) On the application of Euler deconvolution to the analytic signal. Geophysics, 71(6), L87–L93.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Florio, G., Fedi, M. & Pašteka, R. (2014) On the estimation of the structural index from low‐pass filtered magnetic data. Geophysics, 79(6), J67–J80.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gang, Y. & Lin, Z. (2018) An improved stable downward continuation of potential fields using a truncated Taylor series and regularized vertical derivatives method. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 15(5), 2001–2008.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gubbins, D. (2004) Time series analysis and inverse theory for geophysicists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hsu, S.‐K., Sibuet, J.‐C. & Shyu, C.‐T. (1996) High‐resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential‐field anomalies: an enhanced analytic signal technique. Geophysics, 61(2), 373–386.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kafadar, O. (2022) Applications of the Kuwahara and Gaussian filters on potential field data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 198, 104583.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kara, I., Bal, O.T., Tur, H. & Ates, A. (2014) A new efficient method for topographic distortion correction, analytical continuation, vertical derivatives and using equivalent source technique: application to field data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 106, 67–76.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Karcol, R. & Pašteka, R. (2021) Functional approach to the search for the quasioptimal value of the regularization parameter in downward continuation of potential fields. Geophysics, 86(5), G69–G76.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ku, C.C., Telford, W.M. & Lim, S.H. (1971) The use of linear filtering in gravity problems. Geophysics, 36(6), 1174–1203.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lee, J., Li, Y. & Lane, R. (2005) Effects of data filtering on inversion of gravity gradient data. In 2005 SEG Annual Meeting. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 627–630.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Legchenko, A., Clément, R., Garambois, S., Maury, E., Mic, L.‐M., Laurent, J.‐P., Desplanque, C. & Guyard, H. (2011) Investigating water distribution in the Luitel Lake peat bog using MRS, ERT and GPR. Near Surface Geophysics, 9(2), 201–209.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Martinez, C. & Li, Y. (2016) Denoising of gravity gradient data using an equivalent source technique. Geophysics, 81(4), G67–G79.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Melo, J.A., Mendonça, C.A. & Marangoni, Y.R. (2023) Python programs to apply regularized derivatives in the magnetic tilt derivative and gradient intensity data processing: a graphical procedure to choose the regularization parameter. Applied Computing and Geosciences, 19, 100129.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Morozov, V.A. (1966) On the solution of functional equations by the method of regularization. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 7, 414–417.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Oliveira, S.P. & Pham, L.T. (2022) A stable finite difference method based on upward continuation to evaluate vertical derivatives of potential field data. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 179(12), 4555–4566.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pašteka, R., Richter, F.P., Karcol, R., Brazda, K. & Hajach, M. (2009) Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi‐automated interpretation methods. Geophysical Prospecting, 57(4), 507–516.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Pawlowski, R.S. & Hansen, R.O. (1990) Gravity anomaly separation by Wiener filtering. Geophysics, 55(5), 539–548.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pedersen, L.B., Bastani, M. & Kamm, J. (2015) Gravity gradient and magnetic terrain effects for airborne applications – a practical fast Fourier transform technique. Geophysics, 80(2), J19–J26.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pham, L.T., Oksum, E., Le, D.V., Ferreira, F. J.F. & Le, S.T. (2022) Edge detection of potential field sources using the Softsign function. Geocarto International, 37(14), 4255–4268.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Reilly, W.I. (1969) Interpolation, smoothing, and differentiation of gravity anomalies. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 12(4), 609–627.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Roy, I.G. (2020) An optimal Savitzky–Golay derivative filter with geophysical applications: an example of self‐potential data. Geophysical Prospecting, 68(3), 1041–1056.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Roy, I.G. (2022) Regularized 2D Savitzky–Golay derivative filter in estimating the second vertical derivative of potential field data. Geophysical Prospecting, 70(6), 1066–1081.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Saltus, R.W., Blakely, R.J., Haeussler, P.J. & Wells, R.E. (2005) Utility of aeromagnetic studies for mapping of potentially active faults in two forearc basins: Puget Sound, Washington, and Cook Inlet, Alaska. Earth Planets Space, 57(8), 781–793.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Shanks, J.L. (1967) Recursion filters for digital processing. Geophysics, 32(1), 33–51.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Spector, A. & Grant, F.S. (1970) Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics, 35(2), 293–302.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tikhonov, A.N., Glasko, V.B., Litvinenko, O.K. & Melihov, V.R. (1968) Analytic continuation of a potential in the direction of disturbing masses by the regularization method. Izvestia, Earth Physics, 12, 738–747.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tran, K.V. & Nguyen, T.N. (2020) A novel method for computing the vertical gradients of the potential field: application to downward continuation. Geophysical Journal International, 220(2), 1316–1329.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Trompat, H., Boschetti, F. & Hornby, P. (2003) Improved downward continuation of potential field data. Exploration Geophysics, 34(4), 249–256.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Weihermann, J.D., Oliveira, S.P., Li, Y., Silva, A.M. & Ferreira, F. J.F. (2023) Two‐dimensional inversion of airborne radiometric data for source concentrations: application to Cu–Au targeting at Mara Rosa Magmatic Arc, Brazil. Geophysical Prospecting, 71(5), 876–888.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Zahorec, P., Pašteka, R., Mikuška, J., Szalaiová, V., Papco, J., Kušnirák, D., Pánisová, J., Krajňák, M., Vajda, P., Bielik, M. & Marušiak, I. (2017) National gravimetric database of the Slovak republic. In Pašteka, R. Mikuška, J. & Meurers, B. (Eds.), Understanding the Bouguer anomaly – a gravimetry puzzle. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 113–125.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Zeng, X., Li, X., Jia, W., Chen, D. & Liu, D. (2015) Iterative Wiener filter for unstable linear transformations of potential field data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 115, 100–109.
    [Google Scholar]