1887
Volume 72, Issue 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

We adopt extreme value theory to estimate the upper limit of the next record‐breaking magnitudes of induced seismic events. The methodology is based on order statistics and does not rely on knowledge of the state of the subsurface reservoir or injection strategy. The estimation depends on the history of record‐breaking events produced by the anthropogenic activities. We apply the methodology to three different types of industrial operations: natural gas production, saltwater disposal and hydraulic fracturing. We show that the upper limit estimate provides a reliable and realistic upper bound for magnitudes of the record‐breaking events in investigated datasets including 15 publicly available datasets. The predicted magnitudes do not overestimate the observed magnitudes by more than 1.0 magnitude unit and underestimation is rare, probably resulting from insufficient sampling of the statistical distribution of the induced seismicity. The richest dataset, sourced from downhole and surface monitoring of the Preston New Road hydraulic fracturing, provides reliable estimates of the magnitudes over three orders of magnitudes with only slight underprediction of the largest observed event. While the detection of weaker events improves the performance of the method, we show that it can be applied even with a few observed record‐breaking events to provide reliable estimates of magnitudes. However, care must be taken to ensure that event catalogues are estimated consistently across a range of magnitudes.

© 2024 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2024 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13553
2024-08-23
2026-01-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13553
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bao, X. & Eaton, D.W. (2016) Fault activation by hydraulic fracturing in western Canada. Science, 354, 1406–1409.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Baptie, B., Luckett, R., Butcher, A. & Werner, M. (2020) Robust relationships for magnitude conversion of PNR seismicity catalogues. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/20/042.
  3. Barlow, A.M., Sherlock, C. & Tawn, J. (2020) Inference for extreme values under threshold‐based stopping rules. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 69(4), 765–789.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bommer, J., Oates, S., Cepeda, J.M., Lindholm, C., Bird, J., Torres, R., Marroquín, G. & Rivas, J. (2006) Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project. Engineering Geology, 83(4), 287–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourne, S., Oates, S., van Elk, J.F. & Doornhof, D. (2014) A seismological model for earthquakes induced by fluid extraction from a subsurface reservoir. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(12), 8991–9015.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao, N.‐T., Eisner, L. & Jechumtálová, Z. (2020) Next record‐breaking magnitude for injection induced seismicity. First Break, 38(2), 53–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Clarke, H., Verdon, J., Kettlety, T., Baird, A. & Kendall, M. (2019) Real‐time imaging, forecasting, and management of human‐induced seismicity at Preston New Road, Lancashire, England. Seismological Research Letters, 90(5), 1902–1915.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooke, P.J. (1979) Statistical inference for bounds of random variables. Biometrica, 66(2), 367–374.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahm, T., Cesca, S., Hainzl, S., Braun, T. & Krüger, F. (2015) Discrimination between induced, triggered, and natural earthquakes close to hydrocarbon reservoirs: a probabilistic approach based on the modeling of depletion‐induced stress changes and seismological source parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120(4), 2491–2509.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Eaton, D.W., Igonin, N., Poulin, A., Weir, R., Zhang, H., Pellegrino, S. & Rodriguez, G. (2018) Induced seismicity characterization during hydraulic‐fracture monitoring with a shallow‐wellbore geophone array and broadband sensors. Seismological Research Letters, 89(5), 1641–1651.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisner, L., Cao, N.‐T., Verdon, J.P., Jechumtalova, Z., bin Waheed, U. & Stanek, F. (2023) Evaluating monitoring array performance using upper limit magnitude prediction. In 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, volume 2023. Houten, the Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, pp. 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fasola, S., Brudzinski, M.R., Skoumal, R.J., Langenkamp, T., Currie, B.S., & Smart, K.J. (2019) Hydraulic fracture injection strategy influences the probability of earthquakes in the Eagle Ford Shale play of South Texas. Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 12958–12967.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Halló, M., Opršal, I., Eisner, L. & Ali, M.Y. (2014) Prediction of magnitude of the largest potentially induced seismic event. Journal of Seismology, 18(3), 421–431.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Healy, J.H., Rubey, W.W., Griggs, D.T. & Raleigh, C.B. (1968) The Denver earthquakes. Science, 161(3848), 1301–1310.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kendall, J., Butcher, A., Stork, A.L., Verdon, J.P., Luckett, R. & Baptie, B.J. (2019) How big is a small earthquake? Challenges in determining microseismic magnitudes. First Break, 37(2), 51–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kettlety, T., Verdon, J., Butcher, A., Hampson, M. & Craddock, L. (2021) High‐resolution imaging of the ML 2.9 August 2019 earthquake in Lancashire, United Kingdom, induced by hydraulic fracturing during Preston New Road PNR‐2 operations. Seismological Research Letters, 92(1), 151–169.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kettlety, T., Verdon, J., Werner, M. & Kendall, M. (2020) Stress transfer from opening hydraulic fractures controls the distribution of induced seismicity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(1), e2019JB018794.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kijko, A. (2004) Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, mmax. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 161, 1655–1681.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kivi, I.R., Pujades, E., Rutqvist, J. & Vilarrasa, V. (2022) Cooling‐induced reactivation of distant faults during long‐termgeothermal energy production in hot sedimentary aquifers. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 2065.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kwiatek, G., Saarno, T., Ader, T., Blümle, F., Bohnhoff, M., Chendorain, M., Dresen, G., Heikkinen, P., Kukkonen, I., Leary, P., Leonhardt, M., Malin, P., Martínez‐Garzón, P., Passmore, K., Passmore, P., Valenzuela, S. & Wollin, C. (2019) Controlling fluid‐induced seismicity during a 6.1‐km‐deep geothermal stimulation in Finland. Science Advances, 5(5), eaav7224.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Mancini, S., Werner, M., Segou, M. & Baptie, B. (2021) Probabilistic forecasting of hydraulic fracturing induced seismicity using an injection‐rate driven ETAS model. Seismological Research Letters, 92(6), 3471–3481.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mendecki, A.J. (2012) Size distribution of seismic events in mines. In Proceedings of the Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2012 Conference, 7–9 December 2012, Queensland, Australia. Richmond, Australia, Australian Earthquake Engineering Society, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mendecki, A.J. (2013) Characteristics of seismic hazard in mines. In Proceedings 8th International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Russia, 2013. Obninsk, Russia: Geophysical Survey of Russia Academy of Sciences, pp. 275–292.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mendecki, A.J. (2016) Mine seismology reference book: Seismic hazard. Kingston, Australia: Institute of Mine Seismology.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Molina, I., Velasquez, J.S., Rubinstein, J., Garcia, A. & Dionicio, V. (2020) Seismicity induced by massive wastewater injection near Puerto Gaitán, Colombia. Geophysical Journal International, 223(2), 777–791.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. NAM . (2022) Report on the Second Workshop on Mmax for seismic hazard and risk analysis in the Groningen Gas Field. Assen, Netherlands: Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V.
  27. Nantanoi, S., Rodríguez‐Pradilla, G. & Verdon, J.P. (2022) 3D seismic interpretation and fault slip potential analysis fromhydraulic fracturing in the Bowland Shale, UK. Petroleum Geology, 28(2), petgeo2021–057.
  28. Oates, S., Landman, A.J., van der Wal, O., Baehr, H. & Piening, H. (2022) Geomechanical, seismological, and geodetic data pertaining to the Groningen gas field: a data package used in the ‘Mmax II Workshop’, on constraining the maximum earthquake magnitude in the Groningen field. https://public.yoda.uu.nl/geo/UU01/RHHRPY.html
  29. Palgunadi, K.H., Gabriel, A.‐A., Ulrich, T., Ángel Lopéz‐Comino, J. & Mai, P.M. (2020) Dynamic fault interaction during a fluid‐injection induced earthquake: The 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang event. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 110(5), 2328–2349.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Schultz, R., Beroza, G.C. & Ellsworth, W.L. (2021) A strategy for choosing red‐light thresholds to manage hydraulic fracturing induced seismicity in North America. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(12), e2021JB022340.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Schultz, R. & Wang, R. (2020) Newly emerging cases of hydraulic fracturing induced seismicity in the Duvernay East Shale Basin. Tectonophysics, 779, 228393.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Segall, P. (1989) Earthquakes triggered by fluid extraction. Geology, 17(10), 942–946.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Shapiro, S., Dinske, C., Langenbruch, C. & Wenzel, F. (2010) Seismological index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations. The Leading Edge, 29(3), 304–309.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Spearing, H., Tawn, J., Irons, D., Paulden, T. & Bennett, G. (2020) Ranking, and other properties, of elite swimmers using extreme value theory. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 184(4), 368–395.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Tata, M.N. (1969) On outstanding values in a sequence of random variables. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 12(1), 9–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Van Aalsburg, J., Newman, W.I., Turcotte, D.L. & Rundle, J.B. (2010) Record‐breaking earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(4), 1800–1805.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. van der Elst, N.J., Page, M.T., Weiser, D.A., Goebel, T. H.W. & Hosseini, S.M. (2016) Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as (statistically) expected. Journal of Geophysical Research, 121, 4575–4590.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Varty, Z., Tawn, J.A., Atkinson, P.M. & Bierman, S. (2021) Inference for extreme earthquake magnitudes accounting for a time‐varying measurement process. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.00884
  39. Verdon, J. & Bommer, J. (2021) Green, yellow, red, or out of the blue? An assessment of Traffic Light Schemes to mitigate the impact of hydraulic fracturing‐induced seismicity. Journal of Seismology, 25(1), 301–326.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Verdon, J., Stork, A., Bissell, R., Bond, C. & Werner, M. (2015) Simulation of seismic events induced by CO2 injection at In Salah, Algeria. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 426, 118–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Viegas, G., Baig, A., Coulter, W. & Urbancic, T. (2012) Effective monitoring of reservoir‐induced seismicity utilizing integrated surface and downhole seismic networks. First Break, 30(7), 77–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Vlek, C. (2019) The Groningen gasquakes: Foreseeable surprises, complications of hard science, and the search for effective risk communication. Seismological Research Letters, 90(3), 1071–1077.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Willacy, C., van Dedem, E., Minisini, S., Li, J., Blokland, J.‐W., Das, I. & Droujinine, A. (2019) Full‐waveform event location and moment tensor inversion for induced seismicity. Geophysics, 84(2), KS39–KS57.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Yoder, M., Turcotte, D. & Rundle, J. (2010) Record‐breaking earthquake intervals in a global catalogue and an aftershock sequence. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 17, 169–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Zoback, M.D. (2007) Reservoir geomechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13553
Loading
Upper limit magnitudes for induced seismicity in energy industries
Geophysical Prospecting 72, 2784 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13553
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13553
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13553
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): modeling; passive method; reservoir geophysics; rock physics; seismics; theory

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error