1887
Volume 72, Issue 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13555
2024-09-15
2026-02-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bachrach, R., Busanello, G. & Sayed, A. (2022) Applications of surface distributed acoustic sensing for CO2 storage and windfarms: results from large scale experiment. In: 3rd global energy transition conference & exhibition, EAGE. Utrecht, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. Vol. 2022, pp. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachrach, R., Ramani, K., Kanrar, A., Gupta, S., Sayed, A., Twynam, F. et al. (2023) New wiggles from old cables: data processing and imaging considerations. Geophysics, 88, WC199–WC208.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakku, S.K. (2015) Fracture characterization from seismic measurements in a borehole. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  4. Bakulin, A., Silvestrov, I. & Pevzner, R. (2018) Surface seismic with DAS: looking deep and shallow at the same time. In: 88th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts. Houston, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. pp. 16–20.
  5. Bakulin, A., Silvestrov, I. & Pevzner, R. (2020) Surface seismics with DAS: an emerging alternative to modern point‐sensor acquisition. The Leading Edge, 39, 808–818.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bona, A., Dean, T., Correa, J., Pevzner, R., Tertyshnikov, K.V. & van Zaanen, L. (2017) Amplitude and phase response of DAS receivers. In: 79th conference and exhibition, EAGE, extended abstracts. Utrecht, EAGE. 1–5.
  7. Busanello, G., Bachrach, R., Sayed, A. & Soliman, B. (2023) Surface distributed acoustic sensing (S‐DAS) for high resolution near surface characterization. Results from a 3D onshore field experiment. Geophysics, 88, 1–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Y., Savvaidis, A., Fomel, S., Chen, Y., Saad, O.M., Wang, H. et al. (2022) Denoising of distributed acoustic sensing seismic data using an integrated framework. Seismological Research Letters, 94, 457–472.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dean, T., Cuny, T. & Hartog, A.H. (2017) The effect of gauge length on axially incident P‐waves measured using fibre optic distributed vibration sensing: gauge length effect on incident P‐waves. Geophysical Prospecting, 65, 184–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Galbraith, M. (2004) A new methodology for 3D survey design. The Leading Edge, 23, 1017–1023.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartog, A.H. (2017) An introduction to distributed optical fibre sensors, 1st edition, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sayed, A., Ali, S. & Stewart, R.R. (2020) Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) to velocity transform and its benefits. In: 90th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts. Houston, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. pp. 3788–3792.
  13. Sayed, A., Khaitan, M.L., Ali, S. & Martinez, A. (2021) Characterizing anelastic attenuation using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) data. In: First international meeting for applied geoscience & energy, SEG/AAPG, expanded abstracts. Houston, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. pp. 3505–3509.
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13555
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13555
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): DAS; Fibre; Gauge Length; Surface‐DAS; Survey Design

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error