Seismic wave propagation in coupled fluid and porous media: A finite element approach

References

1. Amestoy, P.R., Duff, I.S., Koster, J. & L'Excellent, J.‐Y. (2001) A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 23(1), 15–41.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Amestoy, P.R., Guermouche, A., L'Excellent, J.‐Y. & Pralet, S. (2006) Hybrid scheduling for the parallel solution of linear systems. Parallel Computing, 32(2), 136–156.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antonietti, P., Botti, M., Mazzieri, I. & Poltri, S.N. (2021) A high‐order discontinuous Galerkin method for the poroelasto‐acoustic problem on polygonal and polyhedral grids. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 4, B1–B28.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Astley, R.J. (1998) Handbook of noise and vibration control: Numerical acoustical modeling (finite element modeling). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Badia, S., Quaini, A. & Quarteroni, A. (2009) Coupling Biot and Navier‐Stokes equations for modelling fluid‐poroelastic media interaction. Journal of Computational Physics, 228, 7986–8014.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Balakrishnan, B., Divyadev, C.M., Raja, S. & Venkataramana, K. (2015) Structural and vibroacoustic analysis of aircraft fuselage section with passive noise reducing materials: a material performance study. Paper presented at the 4th International Engineering Symposium (IES2015), 4–6 March 2015, Kumamoto, Japan.
7. Barbosa, N.D., Rubino, J.G., Caspari, E., Milani, M. & Holliger, K. (2016) Fluid pressure diffusion effects on the seismic reflectivity of a single fracture. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10(4), 1547–1570.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barucq, H., Diaz, J., Meyer, R.‐C. & Pham, H. (2020) Low‐order absorbing boundary condition for two‐dimensional isotropic poroelasticity. Technical Report RR 9358, INRIA.
9. Barucq, H., Diaz, J., Meyer, R.‐C. & Pham, H. (2021) Implementation of hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for time‐harmonic anisotropic poroelasticity in two dimensions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 122(12), 3015–3043.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bermúdez, A., Ferrín, J.L. & Prieto, A. (2006) Finite element solution of new displacement/pressure poroelastic models in acoustics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195, 1914–1932.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Biot, M.A. (1956a) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid: I. Low frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28(2), 168–178.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Biot, M.A. (1956b) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid: II. High frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28(2), 178–191.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Biot, M.A. (1962) Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. Journal of Applied Physics, 34(1), 36–40.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brajanovski, M., Gurevich, B. & Schoenberg, M. (2005) A model for P‐wave attenuation and dispersion in a porous medium permeated by aligned fracture. Geophysical Journal International, 163, 372–384.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cagniard, L., Flinn, E.A., Dix, C.H. & Mayer, W.G. (1963) Reflection and refraction of progressive seismic waves. Physics Today, 2(16), 64.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Carcione, J. (2014) Wave fields in real media, third edition. New York: Elsevier Science.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chen, W., Wang, Z., Zhao, K., Chen, G. & Li, X. (2015) Reflection of acoustic wave from the elastic seabed with an overlying gassy poroelastic layer. Geophysical Journal International, 203(1), 207–221.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chiavassa, G. & Lombard, B. (2013) Wave propagation across acoustic/Biot's media: a finite‐difference method. Communications in Computational Physics, 13(4), 985–1012.
    [Google Scholar]
19. De Basabe, J.D. & Sen, M.K. (2014) A comparison of finite‐difference and spectral‐element methods for elastic wave propagation in media with a fluid‐solid interface. Geophysical Journal International, 200(1), 278–298.
    [Google Scholar]
20. De Basabe, J.D., Sen, M.K. & Wheeler, M.F. (2016) Elastic wave propagation in fractured media using the discontinuous Galerkin method. Geophysics, 81(4), T163–T174.
    [Google Scholar]
21. de Hoop, A.T. (1959) The surface line source problem. Applied Scientific Research. Section B: Electrophysics, Acoustics, Optics, Mathematical Methods, 8, 349–356.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Denneman, A.I.M., Drijkoningen, G.G., Smeulders, M. & Wapenaar, K. (2002) Reflection and transmission of waves at a fluid/porous‐medium interface. Geophysics, 67(1), 282–291.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Deresiewicz, H. & Skalak, R. (1963) On uniqueness in dynamic poroelasticity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 4(53), 783–788.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Diaz, J. & Ezziani, A. (2010) Analytical solution for wave propagation in stratified poroelastic medium. part i: the 2D case. INRIA, (RR 6591), pp. 27.
25. Douglas, J., Santos, J.E., Sheen, D. & Ye, X. (1999) Nonconforming Galerkin methods based on quadrilateral elements for second order elliptic problems. Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Analysis, 33(4), 747–770.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Elías, M.W., Zyserman, F.I., Rosas‐Carbajal, M. & Manassero, M.C. (2022) Three‐dimensional modelling of controlled source electro‐magnetic surveys using non‐conforming finite element methods. Geophysical Journal International, 229(2), 1133–1151.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Favretto‐Anres, N. & Rabau, G. (1997) Excitation of the Stoneley‐Scholte wave at the boundary between an ideal fluid and a viscoelastic solid. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2(203), 193–208.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gao, Y., Wang, M., Hu, H. & Chen, X. (2017) Seismoelectric responses to an explosive source in a fluid above a fluid‐saturated porous medium. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(9), 7190–7218.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gauzellino, P. & Santos, J. (2001) Frequency domain wave propagation modeling in exploration seismology. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 9(3), 941–955.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gauzellino, P.M., Zyserman, F.I. & Santos, J.E. (2008) A study of ultrasonic wave propagation in bones. Latin American Applied Research, 38(4), 361–368.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Girault, V. & Raviart, P. (1979) Finite element approximation of the Navier‐Stokes equations. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gurevich, B., Brajanovsky, M., Galvin, R., Müller, T. & Toms‐Stewart, J. (2009) P‐wave dispersion and attenuation in fractured and porous reservoirs ‐ poroelasticity approach. Geophysical Prospecting, 57, 225–237.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ha, T., Santos, J. & Sheen, D. (2002) Nonconforming finite element methods for the simulation of waves in viscoelastic solids. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 19, 5647–5670.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Haire, T.J. & Langton, C.M. (1999) Biot theory: A review of its application to ultrasound propagation through cancellous bone. Bone, 24(4), 291–295.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Han, S., Jeng, D. & Tsai, C. (2019) Response of a porous seabed around an immersed tunnel under wave loading: meshfree model. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(7), 369.
    [Google Scholar]
36. He, Y., Chen, T. & Gao, J. (2020) Perfectly matched absorbing layer for modelling transient wave propagation in heterogeneous poroelastic media. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 17(1), 18–34.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Johnson, D.L., Koplik, J. & Dashen, R. (1987) Theory of dynamic permeability in fluid saturated porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 176, 379–402.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kinsler, L.A., Frey, A.R., Coppens, A.B. & Sanders, J.V. (2000) Fundamentals of acoustics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lemoine, G.I. & Ou, M.Y. (2014) Finite volume modeling of poroelastic‐fluid wave propagation with mapped grids. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 36(3), B396–B426.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lissa, S., Barbosa, N.D. & Quintal, B. (2021) Fluid pressure diffusion in fractured media: the role played by the geometry of real fractures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, e2021JB022233.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Liu, X. (2023) Modeling seismic waves in ocean with the presence of irregular seabed and rough sea surface. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 20, 49–66.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lovera, O.M. (1987) Boundary conditions for a fluid‐saturated porous solid. Surveys in Geophysics, 52(2), 174–178.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Manassero, C., Afonso, J., Zyserman, F., Zlotnik, S. & Fomin, I. (2021) A reduced order approach for probabilistic inversions of 3D magnetotelluric data II: Joint inversion of MT and surface‐wave data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, e2021JB021962.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Manassero, M., Afonso, J., Zyserman, F., Zlotnik, C. & Fomin, I. (2020) A reduced order approach for probabilistic inversions of 3D magnetotelluric data I: General formulation. Geophysical Journal International, 223(3), 1837–1863.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Matuszyk, P.J. & Demkowicz, L.F. (2014) Solution of coupled poroelastic/acoustic/elastic wave propagation problems using automatic hp‐adaptivity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 281, 54–80.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Morency, C. & Tromp, J. (2008) Spectral‐element simulations of wave propagation in porous media. Geophysical Journal International, 175, 301–345.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Nédélec, J. (1980) A new family of mixed finite elements in R3$\mathbb {R}^3$. Numerische Mathematik, 50(1), 57–81.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Parastatidis, E., Hildyard, M.W. & Nowacki, A. (2021) Simplified seismic modelling of fractured rock: how effective is the localised effective medium compared to explicit representation of individual fractures. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54, 5465–5481.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Pride, S. (1994) Governing equations for the coupled electromagnetics and acoustics of porous media. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 50, 15678–15695.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Pride, S.R. (2005) Relationships between seismic and hydrological properties. In Hydrogeophysics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, chapter 9, pp. 253–291.
51. Rubino, G., Castromán, G., Monachesi, L., Müller, T., Zyserman, F. & Holliger, K. (2015) Including poroelastic effects in the linear slip theory. Geophysics, 80(2), A51–A56.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Rubino, G., Ravazzoli, C. & Santos, J. (2008) Biot‐type scattering effects in gas hydrate‐bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, B0612. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004871.
53. Rubino, J.G. & Holliger, K. (2012) Seismic attenuation and velocity dispersion in heterogeneous partially saturated porous rocks. Geophysical Journal International, 188, 1088–1102.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Rubino, J.G., Müller, T., Guarracino, L., Milani, M. & Holliger, K. (2014) Seismoacoustic signatures of fracture connectivity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(3), 2252–2271.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Rubino, J.G., Muller, T.M., Milani, M. & Holliger, K. (2014) Seismic attenuation and velocity dispersion in fractured rocks: the role played by fracture contact areas. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(6), 1278–1296.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Santos, J., Corberó, J. & Douglas, J. (1992) Static and dynamic behavior of a porous solid saturated by a two‐phase fluid. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(4), 1428–1438.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Santos, J., Ravazzoli, C., Gauzellino, P. & Carcione, J. (2005) Numerical simulation of ultrasonic waves in reservoir rocks with patchy saturation and fractal petrophysical properties. Computational Geosciences, 9, 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Santos, J., Ravazzoli, C., Gauzellino, P., Carcione, J. & Cavallini, F. (2004) Simulation of waves in poro‐viscoelastic rocks saturated by immiscible fluids. numerical evidence of a second slow wave. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 12, 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Santos, J.E. (1998) Global and domain‐decomposed mixed methods for the solution of Maxwell's equation with application to magnetotellurics. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 14, 263–280.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Santos, J.E. (2011) Finite element approximation of coupled seismic and electromagnetic waves in fluid‐saturated poroviscoelastic media. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 27, 351–386.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Shan, Z., Ling, D., Jing, L. & Li, Y. (2018) Analytical solution for the transient response of a fluid/saturated porous medium half‐space system subjected to an impulsive line source. Geophysical Journal International, 214, 1041–1060.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sharma, M.D. (2009) Boundary conditions for porous solids saturated with viscous fluid. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 30(7), 821–832.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Sidler, R., Carcione, J.M. & Holliger, K. (2010) Simulation of surface waves in porous media. Geophysical Journal International, 183, 820–832.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Sidler, R., Rubino, G. & Holliger, K. (2013) Quantitative comparison between simulations of seismic wave propagation in heterogeneous poro‐elastic media and equivalent visco‐elastic solids for marine‐type environments. Geophysical Journal International, 193, 463–474.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Wang, D., Gao, Y., Yao, C., Wang, B. & Wang, M. (2020) Seismoelectric and electroseismic responses to a point source in a marine stratified model. Geophysical Prospecting, 68(6), 1958–1979.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Wu, C., Harris, J.M., Nihei, K.T. & Nakagawa, S. (2005) Two‐dimensional finite‐difference seismic modeling of an open fluid‐filled fracture: comparison of thin‐layer and linear‐slip models. Geophysics, 70(4), 57–62.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Ye, J. (2012) Seismic response of poro‐elastic seabed and composite breakwater under strong earthquake loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 1609–1633.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Zhu, J. & Popovics, J.S. (2004) Leaky Rayleigh and Scholte waves at the fluid‐solid interface subjected to transient point loading. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2101–2110.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Zyserman, F., Gauzellino, P. & Jouniaux, L. (2020) Finite Element Modeling of Electroseismics and Seismoelectrics. In N.Grobbe, A.Revil, Z.Zhu, & E.Slob (Eds.), Seismoelectric exploration: Theory, experiments, and applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, chapter 18, pp. 245–267.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Zyserman, F., Gauzellino, P. & Santos, J. (2010) Finite element modeling of SHTE and PSVTM electroseismics. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 72, 79–91.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Zyserman, F., Gauzellino, P. & Santos, J. (2012) Numerical evidence of gas hydrate detection by means of electroseismics. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 86, 98–108.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Zyserman, F. & Santos, J. (2007) Analysis of the numerical dispersion of waves in saturated poroelastic media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196, 4644–4655.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Zyserman, F.I., Gauzellino, P.M. & Santos, J.E. (2003) Dispersion analysis of a non‐conforming finite element method for the Helmholtz and elastodynamic equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 58, 1381–1395.
    [Google Scholar]